Informing debate or fuelling dispute?

Media communication of reconfiguration in Scotland’s rural maternity care

Elizabeth Thomson, Jane Farmer, Janet Stephen Tucker, Helen Bryers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Public reaction to the UK's ongoing health sector reform often results in dilution of policy-makers' goals. Public participation in health service decision-making is advocated in policy, but precisely how to do it and what role public opinion should have in formulating reform strategy is ambiguously described. Public opinion is formed through many influences, including media reporting. This paper examines how reconfiguration at a rural maternity unit at Caithness General Hospital in Wick, Scotland, was communicated in national and local media and considers potential implications of media communication on public participation in policy decision-making. Content analysis of arguments for and against change revealed a high level of reporting of commentators against change in regional newspapers. Qualitative analysis identified emergent themes about how maternity service reconfiguration was portrayed. These included framing opposition between management and local people, and change drivers receiving superficial coverage. Findings suggest that media portrayal of the public role in change may promote an adversarial rather than a participative stance. More finely tuned understanding of the relationship between the reporting of change and public reaction should be attained as this could affect how planned social policy evolves into actual practice.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)789-812
Number of pages24
JournalSocial Policy & Administration
Volume42
Issue number7
Early online date30 Oct 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2008

Keywords

  • Health service reform
  • Rural health care
  • Organizational change
  • Newspapers
  • Media analysis
  • health-service
  • participation
  • consultation
  • power
  • cure

Cite this

Informing debate or fuelling dispute? Media communication of reconfiguration in Scotland’s rural maternity care. / Thomson, Elizabeth; Farmer, Jane; Tucker, Janet Stephen; Bryers, Helen.

In: Social Policy & Administration, Vol. 42, No. 7, 12.2008, p. 789-812.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2598c8bf03d2462c86f59b128cabe23b,
title = "Informing debate or fuelling dispute?: Media communication of reconfiguration in Scotland’s rural maternity care",
abstract = "Public reaction to the UK's ongoing health sector reform often results in dilution of policy-makers' goals. Public participation in health service decision-making is advocated in policy, but precisely how to do it and what role public opinion should have in formulating reform strategy is ambiguously described. Public opinion is formed through many influences, including media reporting. This paper examines how reconfiguration at a rural maternity unit at Caithness General Hospital in Wick, Scotland, was communicated in national and local media and considers potential implications of media communication on public participation in policy decision-making. Content analysis of arguments for and against change revealed a high level of reporting of commentators against change in regional newspapers. Qualitative analysis identified emergent themes about how maternity service reconfiguration was portrayed. These included framing opposition between management and local people, and change drivers receiving superficial coverage. Findings suggest that media portrayal of the public role in change may promote an adversarial rather than a participative stance. More finely tuned understanding of the relationship between the reporting of change and public reaction should be attained as this could affect how planned social policy evolves into actual practice.",
keywords = "Health service reform, Rural health care, Organizational change, Newspapers, Media analysis, health-service, participation, consultation, power, cure",
author = "Elizabeth Thomson and Jane Farmer and Tucker, {Janet Stephen} and Helen Bryers",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00638.x",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "789--812",
journal = "Social Policy & Administration",
issn = "0144-5596",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informing debate or fuelling dispute?

T2 - Media communication of reconfiguration in Scotland’s rural maternity care

AU - Thomson, Elizabeth

AU - Farmer, Jane

AU - Tucker, Janet Stephen

AU - Bryers, Helen

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Public reaction to the UK's ongoing health sector reform often results in dilution of policy-makers' goals. Public participation in health service decision-making is advocated in policy, but precisely how to do it and what role public opinion should have in formulating reform strategy is ambiguously described. Public opinion is formed through many influences, including media reporting. This paper examines how reconfiguration at a rural maternity unit at Caithness General Hospital in Wick, Scotland, was communicated in national and local media and considers potential implications of media communication on public participation in policy decision-making. Content analysis of arguments for and against change revealed a high level of reporting of commentators against change in regional newspapers. Qualitative analysis identified emergent themes about how maternity service reconfiguration was portrayed. These included framing opposition between management and local people, and change drivers receiving superficial coverage. Findings suggest that media portrayal of the public role in change may promote an adversarial rather than a participative stance. More finely tuned understanding of the relationship between the reporting of change and public reaction should be attained as this could affect how planned social policy evolves into actual practice.

AB - Public reaction to the UK's ongoing health sector reform often results in dilution of policy-makers' goals. Public participation in health service decision-making is advocated in policy, but precisely how to do it and what role public opinion should have in formulating reform strategy is ambiguously described. Public opinion is formed through many influences, including media reporting. This paper examines how reconfiguration at a rural maternity unit at Caithness General Hospital in Wick, Scotland, was communicated in national and local media and considers potential implications of media communication on public participation in policy decision-making. Content analysis of arguments for and against change revealed a high level of reporting of commentators against change in regional newspapers. Qualitative analysis identified emergent themes about how maternity service reconfiguration was portrayed. These included framing opposition between management and local people, and change drivers receiving superficial coverage. Findings suggest that media portrayal of the public role in change may promote an adversarial rather than a participative stance. More finely tuned understanding of the relationship between the reporting of change and public reaction should be attained as this could affect how planned social policy evolves into actual practice.

KW - Health service reform

KW - Rural health care

KW - Organizational change

KW - Newspapers

KW - Media analysis

KW - health-service

KW - participation

KW - consultation

KW - power

KW - cure

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00638.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2008.00638.x

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 789

EP - 812

JO - Social Policy & Administration

JF - Social Policy & Administration

SN - 0144-5596

IS - 7

ER -