Innovation, collaboration and learning in regional clusters: a study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex

A. Cumbers, Daniel F MacKinnon, Keith Chapman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    96 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Issues of regional innovation and learning have attracted growing interest from economic geographers and related specialists in recent years. The advantages to be gained from localised networks and learning are claimed to be particularly important for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in helping offset the size-related advantages of larger firms. Such claims are part of a wider rediscovery of the benefits of clustering and agglomeration in economic geography. Yet, to date, theoretical speculation about the renewed importance of geographical clustering for SMEs has run ahead of detailed empirical research. Beyond a few well-known case studies of high-technology clusters, there have been few attempts systematically to 'test' assertions made about the links between innovation, collaboration, and learning. The authors' purpose in this paper is to contribute new empirical evidence to this debate through a case study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex. Although they find some evidence to support the role of localised forms of collaboration among the most innovative SMEs, the authors' results also indicate the importance of extralocal networks of knowledge transfer and the unequal power relations that underpin interfirm relations. These findings reinforce recent calls for a shift of focus from 'regions' to 'networks, raising some fundamental questions about the substantive basis of clusters policy.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1689-1706
    Number of pages17
    JournalEnvironment and Planning A
    Volume35
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • KNOWLEDGE
    • GLOBALIZATION
    • PERSPECTIVE
    • GEOGRAPHY
    • POLICY
    • FIRMS
    • 1990S

    Cite this

    Innovation, collaboration and learning in regional clusters: a study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex. / Cumbers, A.; MacKinnon, Daniel F; Chapman, Keith.

    In: Environment and Planning A, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2003, p. 1689-1706.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Cumbers, A. ; MacKinnon, Daniel F ; Chapman, Keith. / Innovation, collaboration and learning in regional clusters: a study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex. In: Environment and Planning A. 2003 ; Vol. 35, No. 9. pp. 1689-1706.
    @article{8c2367fc1f6d47a6860a9dd8573f2759,
    title = "Innovation, collaboration and learning in regional clusters: a study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex",
    abstract = "Issues of regional innovation and learning have attracted growing interest from economic geographers and related specialists in recent years. The advantages to be gained from localised networks and learning are claimed to be particularly important for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in helping offset the size-related advantages of larger firms. Such claims are part of a wider rediscovery of the benefits of clustering and agglomeration in economic geography. Yet, to date, theoretical speculation about the renewed importance of geographical clustering for SMEs has run ahead of detailed empirical research. Beyond a few well-known case studies of high-technology clusters, there have been few attempts systematically to 'test' assertions made about the links between innovation, collaboration, and learning. The authors' purpose in this paper is to contribute new empirical evidence to this debate through a case study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex. Although they find some evidence to support the role of localised forms of collaboration among the most innovative SMEs, the authors' results also indicate the importance of extralocal networks of knowledge transfer and the unequal power relations that underpin interfirm relations. These findings reinforce recent calls for a shift of focus from 'regions' to 'networks, raising some fundamental questions about the substantive basis of clusters policy.",
    keywords = "KNOWLEDGE, GLOBALIZATION, PERSPECTIVE, GEOGRAPHY, POLICY, FIRMS, 1990S",
    author = "A. Cumbers and MacKinnon, {Daniel F} and Keith Chapman",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1068/a35259",
    language = "English",
    volume = "35",
    pages = "1689--1706",
    journal = "Environment and Planning A",
    issn = "0308-518X",
    publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Innovation, collaboration and learning in regional clusters: a study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex

    AU - Cumbers, A.

    AU - MacKinnon, Daniel F

    AU - Chapman, Keith

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - Issues of regional innovation and learning have attracted growing interest from economic geographers and related specialists in recent years. The advantages to be gained from localised networks and learning are claimed to be particularly important for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in helping offset the size-related advantages of larger firms. Such claims are part of a wider rediscovery of the benefits of clustering and agglomeration in economic geography. Yet, to date, theoretical speculation about the renewed importance of geographical clustering for SMEs has run ahead of detailed empirical research. Beyond a few well-known case studies of high-technology clusters, there have been few attempts systematically to 'test' assertions made about the links between innovation, collaboration, and learning. The authors' purpose in this paper is to contribute new empirical evidence to this debate through a case study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex. Although they find some evidence to support the role of localised forms of collaboration among the most innovative SMEs, the authors' results also indicate the importance of extralocal networks of knowledge transfer and the unequal power relations that underpin interfirm relations. These findings reinforce recent calls for a shift of focus from 'regions' to 'networks, raising some fundamental questions about the substantive basis of clusters policy.

    AB - Issues of regional innovation and learning have attracted growing interest from economic geographers and related specialists in recent years. The advantages to be gained from localised networks and learning are claimed to be particularly important for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in helping offset the size-related advantages of larger firms. Such claims are part of a wider rediscovery of the benefits of clustering and agglomeration in economic geography. Yet, to date, theoretical speculation about the renewed importance of geographical clustering for SMEs has run ahead of detailed empirical research. Beyond a few well-known case studies of high-technology clusters, there have been few attempts systematically to 'test' assertions made about the links between innovation, collaboration, and learning. The authors' purpose in this paper is to contribute new empirical evidence to this debate through a case study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex. Although they find some evidence to support the role of localised forms of collaboration among the most innovative SMEs, the authors' results also indicate the importance of extralocal networks of knowledge transfer and the unequal power relations that underpin interfirm relations. These findings reinforce recent calls for a shift of focus from 'regions' to 'networks, raising some fundamental questions about the substantive basis of clusters policy.

    KW - KNOWLEDGE

    KW - GLOBALIZATION

    KW - PERSPECTIVE

    KW - GEOGRAPHY

    KW - POLICY

    KW - FIRMS

    KW - 1990S

    U2 - 10.1068/a35259

    DO - 10.1068/a35259

    M3 - Article

    VL - 35

    SP - 1689

    EP - 1706

    JO - Environment and Planning A

    JF - Environment and Planning A

    SN - 0308-518X

    IS - 9

    ER -