Insights into the biodegradation of weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soils by bioaugmentation and nutrient stimulation

Ying Jiang, Kirsty J. Brassington, George Prpich, Graeme I. Paton, Kirk T. Semple, Simon J. T. Pollard, Frederic Coulon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The potential for biotransformation of weathered hydrocarbon residues in soils collected from two commercial oil refinery sites (Soil A and B) was studied in microcosm experiments. Soil A has previously been subjected to on-site bioremediation and it was believed that no further degradation was possible while soil B has not been subjected to any treatment. A number of amendment strategies including bioaugmentation with hydrocarbon degrader, biostimulation with nutrients and soil grinding, were applied to the microcosms as putative biodegradation improvement strategies. The hydrocarbon concentrations in each amendment group were monitored throughout 112 days incubation. Microcosms treated with biostimulation (BS) and biostimulation/bioaugmentation (BS + BA) showed the most significant reductions in the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions. However, soil grinding was shown to reduce the effectiveness of a nutrient treatment on the extent of biotransformation by up to 25% and 20% for the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions, respectively. This is likely due to the disruption to the indigenous microbial community in the soil caused by grinding. Further, ecotoxicological responses (mustard seed germination and Microtox assays) showed that a reduction of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration in soil was not directly correlable to reduction in toxicity; thus monitoring TPH alone is not sufficient for assessing the environmental risk of a contaminated site after remediation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)300-307
Number of pages8
JournalChemosphere
Volume161
Early online date18 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Fingerprint

Hydrocarbons
Biodegradation
Nutrients
biodegradation
hydrocarbon
Soils
nutrient
soil
grinding
microcosm
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
aliphatic hydrocarbon
Petroleum
biotransformation
petroleum hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
Industrial Oils
contaminated soil
Bioremediation
Remediation

Keywords

  • soil contamination
  • bioremediation
  • weathered petroleum hydrocarbon
  • bioaugmentation
  • biostimulation

Cite this

Insights into the biodegradation of weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soils by bioaugmentation and nutrient stimulation. / Jiang, Ying; Brassington, Kirsty J.; Prpich, George; Paton, Graeme I.; Semple, Kirk T.; Pollard, Simon J. T.; Coulon, Frederic.

In: Chemosphere, Vol. 161, 10.2016, p. 300-307.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jiang, Ying ; Brassington, Kirsty J. ; Prpich, George ; Paton, Graeme I. ; Semple, Kirk T. ; Pollard, Simon J. T. ; Coulon, Frederic. / Insights into the biodegradation of weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soils by bioaugmentation and nutrient stimulation. In: Chemosphere. 2016 ; Vol. 161. pp. 300-307.
@article{60edb45b64f44538a142307ffbff72c3,
title = "Insights into the biodegradation of weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soils by bioaugmentation and nutrient stimulation",
abstract = "The potential for biotransformation of weathered hydrocarbon residues in soils collected from two commercial oil refinery sites (Soil A and B) was studied in microcosm experiments. Soil A has previously been subjected to on-site bioremediation and it was believed that no further degradation was possible while soil B has not been subjected to any treatment. A number of amendment strategies including bioaugmentation with hydrocarbon degrader, biostimulation with nutrients and soil grinding, were applied to the microcosms as putative biodegradation improvement strategies. The hydrocarbon concentrations in each amendment group were monitored throughout 112 days incubation. Microcosms treated with biostimulation (BS) and biostimulation/bioaugmentation (BS + BA) showed the most significant reductions in the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions. However, soil grinding was shown to reduce the effectiveness of a nutrient treatment on the extent of biotransformation by up to 25{\%} and 20{\%} for the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions, respectively. This is likely due to the disruption to the indigenous microbial community in the soil caused by grinding. Further, ecotoxicological responses (mustard seed germination and Microtox assays) showed that a reduction of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration in soil was not directly correlable to reduction in toxicity; thus monitoring TPH alone is not sufficient for assessing the environmental risk of a contaminated site after remediation.",
keywords = "soil contamination, bioremediation, weathered petroleum hydrocarbon, bioaugmentation, biostimulation",
author = "Ying Jiang and Brassington, {Kirsty J.} and George Prpich and Paton, {Graeme I.} and Semple, {Kirk T.} and Pollard, {Simon J. T.} and Frederic Coulon",
note = "Acknowledgements This work was supported by the LINK Bioremediation programme (BIOREM_35), the Environment Agency and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBSRC (Grant BB/B512432/1). The authors also thank the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for financial support to carry out this work through a CASE award supported by the former FIRSTFARADAY (Environmental Sustainability KTN) partnership (Ref No. 5010978). The views expressed are authors’ alone and may not reflect the views or policies of their employing organisations.",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.032",
language = "English",
volume = "161",
pages = "300--307",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Insights into the biodegradation of weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soils by bioaugmentation and nutrient stimulation

AU - Jiang, Ying

AU - Brassington, Kirsty J.

AU - Prpich, George

AU - Paton, Graeme I.

AU - Semple, Kirk T.

AU - Pollard, Simon J. T.

AU - Coulon, Frederic

N1 - Acknowledgements This work was supported by the LINK Bioremediation programme (BIOREM_35), the Environment Agency and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBSRC (Grant BB/B512432/1). The authors also thank the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) for financial support to carry out this work through a CASE award supported by the former FIRSTFARADAY (Environmental Sustainability KTN) partnership (Ref No. 5010978). The views expressed are authors’ alone and may not reflect the views or policies of their employing organisations.

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - The potential for biotransformation of weathered hydrocarbon residues in soils collected from two commercial oil refinery sites (Soil A and B) was studied in microcosm experiments. Soil A has previously been subjected to on-site bioremediation and it was believed that no further degradation was possible while soil B has not been subjected to any treatment. A number of amendment strategies including bioaugmentation with hydrocarbon degrader, biostimulation with nutrients and soil grinding, were applied to the microcosms as putative biodegradation improvement strategies. The hydrocarbon concentrations in each amendment group were monitored throughout 112 days incubation. Microcosms treated with biostimulation (BS) and biostimulation/bioaugmentation (BS + BA) showed the most significant reductions in the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions. However, soil grinding was shown to reduce the effectiveness of a nutrient treatment on the extent of biotransformation by up to 25% and 20% for the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions, respectively. This is likely due to the disruption to the indigenous microbial community in the soil caused by grinding. Further, ecotoxicological responses (mustard seed germination and Microtox assays) showed that a reduction of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration in soil was not directly correlable to reduction in toxicity; thus monitoring TPH alone is not sufficient for assessing the environmental risk of a contaminated site after remediation.

AB - The potential for biotransformation of weathered hydrocarbon residues in soils collected from two commercial oil refinery sites (Soil A and B) was studied in microcosm experiments. Soil A has previously been subjected to on-site bioremediation and it was believed that no further degradation was possible while soil B has not been subjected to any treatment. A number of amendment strategies including bioaugmentation with hydrocarbon degrader, biostimulation with nutrients and soil grinding, were applied to the microcosms as putative biodegradation improvement strategies. The hydrocarbon concentrations in each amendment group were monitored throughout 112 days incubation. Microcosms treated with biostimulation (BS) and biostimulation/bioaugmentation (BS + BA) showed the most significant reductions in the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions. However, soil grinding was shown to reduce the effectiveness of a nutrient treatment on the extent of biotransformation by up to 25% and 20% for the aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbon fractions, respectively. This is likely due to the disruption to the indigenous microbial community in the soil caused by grinding. Further, ecotoxicological responses (mustard seed germination and Microtox assays) showed that a reduction of total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentration in soil was not directly correlable to reduction in toxicity; thus monitoring TPH alone is not sufficient for assessing the environmental risk of a contaminated site after remediation.

KW - soil contamination

KW - bioremediation

KW - weathered petroleum hydrocarbon

KW - bioaugmentation

KW - biostimulation

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.032

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.032

M3 - Article

VL - 161

SP - 300

EP - 307

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

ER -