Institutional structures to support the quality enhancement framework in Scotland: process efficiency or just muddling through?

Darren Comber, Lorraine Walsh

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The question of the manner in which universities have organised themselves to embed the 'quality' agenda in Scotland is addressed in this paper by considering whether the seemingly different structures generated are in fact sophisticated and efficient forms of resource allocation, or organic and emergent structures with only local applicability and limited rationale. In exploring individuals' conceptions of their own institutional structures to support the Scottish Quality Enhancement Framework, which is the Quality Assurance Agency's enhancement-led approach in Scotland involving all universities, a series of different structures have emerged. These have been reproduced as a series of maps showing the various quality agencies and individuals and the interrelationships between them. Rather than the development of one single model in the face of sectoral requirements, a variety of approaches were in evidence, revealing structural differences across institutions as a result of the presence or absence of particular bodies. Analysis of the maps through an approach based on the four 'lenses' provided by transactional, business, ecological and situationist perspectives sheds light on whether these individual responses are rooted in efficiency or are based more on Lindblom's interpretation of 'muddling through'. Using these models as a basis, a system is produced for others to interrogate quality structures within their own institutions.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)223-233
    Number of pages11
    JournalQuality in Higher Education
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint

    efficiency
    university
    quality assurance
    interpretation
    resources
    evidence

    Keywords

    • enhancement
    • institutional structures
    • quality

    Cite this

    Institutional structures to support the quality enhancement framework in Scotland : process efficiency or just muddling through? / Comber, Darren; Walsh, Lorraine.

    In: Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2010, p. 223-233.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{a2ebdfa0b5be49bdacd917865e21330d,
    title = "Institutional structures to support the quality enhancement framework in Scotland: process efficiency or just muddling through?",
    abstract = "The question of the manner in which universities have organised themselves to embed the 'quality' agenda in Scotland is addressed in this paper by considering whether the seemingly different structures generated are in fact sophisticated and efficient forms of resource allocation, or organic and emergent structures with only local applicability and limited rationale. In exploring individuals' conceptions of their own institutional structures to support the Scottish Quality Enhancement Framework, which is the Quality Assurance Agency's enhancement-led approach in Scotland involving all universities, a series of different structures have emerged. These have been reproduced as a series of maps showing the various quality agencies and individuals and the interrelationships between them. Rather than the development of one single model in the face of sectoral requirements, a variety of approaches were in evidence, revealing structural differences across institutions as a result of the presence or absence of particular bodies. Analysis of the maps through an approach based on the four 'lenses' provided by transactional, business, ecological and situationist perspectives sheds light on whether these individual responses are rooted in efficiency or are based more on Lindblom's interpretation of 'muddling through'. Using these models as a basis, a system is produced for others to interrogate quality structures within their own institutions.",
    keywords = "enhancement, institutional structures, quality",
    author = "Darren Comber and Lorraine Walsh",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.1080/13538322.2010.506703",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "223--233",
    journal = "Quality in Higher Education",
    issn = "1353-8322",
    publisher = "Routledge",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Institutional structures to support the quality enhancement framework in Scotland

    T2 - process efficiency or just muddling through?

    AU - Comber, Darren

    AU - Walsh, Lorraine

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - The question of the manner in which universities have organised themselves to embed the 'quality' agenda in Scotland is addressed in this paper by considering whether the seemingly different structures generated are in fact sophisticated and efficient forms of resource allocation, or organic and emergent structures with only local applicability and limited rationale. In exploring individuals' conceptions of their own institutional structures to support the Scottish Quality Enhancement Framework, which is the Quality Assurance Agency's enhancement-led approach in Scotland involving all universities, a series of different structures have emerged. These have been reproduced as a series of maps showing the various quality agencies and individuals and the interrelationships between them. Rather than the development of one single model in the face of sectoral requirements, a variety of approaches were in evidence, revealing structural differences across institutions as a result of the presence or absence of particular bodies. Analysis of the maps through an approach based on the four 'lenses' provided by transactional, business, ecological and situationist perspectives sheds light on whether these individual responses are rooted in efficiency or are based more on Lindblom's interpretation of 'muddling through'. Using these models as a basis, a system is produced for others to interrogate quality structures within their own institutions.

    AB - The question of the manner in which universities have organised themselves to embed the 'quality' agenda in Scotland is addressed in this paper by considering whether the seemingly different structures generated are in fact sophisticated and efficient forms of resource allocation, or organic and emergent structures with only local applicability and limited rationale. In exploring individuals' conceptions of their own institutional structures to support the Scottish Quality Enhancement Framework, which is the Quality Assurance Agency's enhancement-led approach in Scotland involving all universities, a series of different structures have emerged. These have been reproduced as a series of maps showing the various quality agencies and individuals and the interrelationships between them. Rather than the development of one single model in the face of sectoral requirements, a variety of approaches were in evidence, revealing structural differences across institutions as a result of the presence or absence of particular bodies. Analysis of the maps through an approach based on the four 'lenses' provided by transactional, business, ecological and situationist perspectives sheds light on whether these individual responses are rooted in efficiency or are based more on Lindblom's interpretation of 'muddling through'. Using these models as a basis, a system is produced for others to interrogate quality structures within their own institutions.

    KW - enhancement

    KW - institutional structures

    KW - quality

    U2 - 10.1080/13538322.2010.506703

    DO - 10.1080/13538322.2010.506703

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 223

    EP - 233

    JO - Quality in Higher Education

    JF - Quality in Higher Education

    SN - 1353-8322

    IS - 3

    ER -