Institutions, power and space: assessing the limits to institutionalism in economic geography

A. Cumbers, Daniel F MacKinnon, Robert McMaster

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    75 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Economic geographers have drawn upon concepts from institutional economics and economic sociology in recent years to understand processes of regional development within an increasingly globalized economy. In this paper, we assess the influence of this institutional 'turn' in economic geography and regional development studies. Two interrelated themes provide the focus of our critique. First, we emphasize the neglect of power and politics in relation to potential intraregional tensions and divisions and the effects of wider processes of uneven development and political-economic regulation. Second, we are critical of the tendency to reify the region over other geographical scales as an object of empirical enquiry and a site of policy intervention. In response to these short-comings, we conclude by emphasizing the need to rediscover 'a sense of political economy' (Martin and Sunley, 2001), suggesting that the potential of institutional approaches can best be realized by linking these to a reworked spatial political economy. While this will inevitably run up against conceptual and methodological difficulties given the differing origins and orientations of the two bodies of knowledge, such a theoretical synthesis could combine a sensitivity to difference, context and contingency with a stronger appreciation of the realities of uneven development and contested social relations under advanced global capitalism.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)325-342
    Number of pages17
    JournalEuropean Urban and Regional Studies
    Volume10
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • institutions
    • power
    • regions
    • scale
    • uneven development
    • REGIONAL POLITICAL-ECONOMY
    • TERRITORIAL POLITICS
    • LOCAL GOVERNANCE
    • CRITICAL REALISM
    • LEARNING REGION
    • INNOVATION
    • SCALE
    • STATE
    • PERSPECTIVE
    • CRISIS

    Cite this

    Institutions, power and space: assessing the limits to institutionalism in economic geography. / Cumbers, A.; MacKinnon, Daniel F; McMaster, Robert.

    In: European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol. 10, No. 4, 2003, p. 325-342.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Cumbers, A. ; MacKinnon, Daniel F ; McMaster, Robert. / Institutions, power and space: assessing the limits to institutionalism in economic geography. In: European Urban and Regional Studies. 2003 ; Vol. 10, No. 4. pp. 325-342.
    @article{c4f6a6192b1f461ba3ed3ad6ef8ac6b2,
    title = "Institutions, power and space: assessing the limits to institutionalism in economic geography",
    abstract = "Economic geographers have drawn upon concepts from institutional economics and economic sociology in recent years to understand processes of regional development within an increasingly globalized economy. In this paper, we assess the influence of this institutional 'turn' in economic geography and regional development studies. Two interrelated themes provide the focus of our critique. First, we emphasize the neglect of power and politics in relation to potential intraregional tensions and divisions and the effects of wider processes of uneven development and political-economic regulation. Second, we are critical of the tendency to reify the region over other geographical scales as an object of empirical enquiry and a site of policy intervention. In response to these short-comings, we conclude by emphasizing the need to rediscover 'a sense of political economy' (Martin and Sunley, 2001), suggesting that the potential of institutional approaches can best be realized by linking these to a reworked spatial political economy. While this will inevitably run up against conceptual and methodological difficulties given the differing origins and orientations of the two bodies of knowledge, such a theoretical synthesis could combine a sensitivity to difference, context and contingency with a stronger appreciation of the realities of uneven development and contested social relations under advanced global capitalism.",
    keywords = "institutions, power, regions, scale, uneven development, REGIONAL POLITICAL-ECONOMY, TERRITORIAL POLITICS, LOCAL GOVERNANCE, CRITICAL REALISM, LEARNING REGION, INNOVATION, SCALE, STATE, PERSPECTIVE, CRISIS",
    author = "A. Cumbers and MacKinnon, {Daniel F} and Robert McMaster",
    year = "2003",
    doi = "10.1177/09697764030104003",
    language = "English",
    volume = "10",
    pages = "325--342",
    journal = "European Urban and Regional Studies",
    issn = "0969-7764",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Institutions, power and space: assessing the limits to institutionalism in economic geography

    AU - Cumbers, A.

    AU - MacKinnon, Daniel F

    AU - McMaster, Robert

    PY - 2003

    Y1 - 2003

    N2 - Economic geographers have drawn upon concepts from institutional economics and economic sociology in recent years to understand processes of regional development within an increasingly globalized economy. In this paper, we assess the influence of this institutional 'turn' in economic geography and regional development studies. Two interrelated themes provide the focus of our critique. First, we emphasize the neglect of power and politics in relation to potential intraregional tensions and divisions and the effects of wider processes of uneven development and political-economic regulation. Second, we are critical of the tendency to reify the region over other geographical scales as an object of empirical enquiry and a site of policy intervention. In response to these short-comings, we conclude by emphasizing the need to rediscover 'a sense of political economy' (Martin and Sunley, 2001), suggesting that the potential of institutional approaches can best be realized by linking these to a reworked spatial political economy. While this will inevitably run up against conceptual and methodological difficulties given the differing origins and orientations of the two bodies of knowledge, such a theoretical synthesis could combine a sensitivity to difference, context and contingency with a stronger appreciation of the realities of uneven development and contested social relations under advanced global capitalism.

    AB - Economic geographers have drawn upon concepts from institutional economics and economic sociology in recent years to understand processes of regional development within an increasingly globalized economy. In this paper, we assess the influence of this institutional 'turn' in economic geography and regional development studies. Two interrelated themes provide the focus of our critique. First, we emphasize the neglect of power and politics in relation to potential intraregional tensions and divisions and the effects of wider processes of uneven development and political-economic regulation. Second, we are critical of the tendency to reify the region over other geographical scales as an object of empirical enquiry and a site of policy intervention. In response to these short-comings, we conclude by emphasizing the need to rediscover 'a sense of political economy' (Martin and Sunley, 2001), suggesting that the potential of institutional approaches can best be realized by linking these to a reworked spatial political economy. While this will inevitably run up against conceptual and methodological difficulties given the differing origins and orientations of the two bodies of knowledge, such a theoretical synthesis could combine a sensitivity to difference, context and contingency with a stronger appreciation of the realities of uneven development and contested social relations under advanced global capitalism.

    KW - institutions

    KW - power

    KW - regions

    KW - scale

    KW - uneven development

    KW - REGIONAL POLITICAL-ECONOMY

    KW - TERRITORIAL POLITICS

    KW - LOCAL GOVERNANCE

    KW - CRITICAL REALISM

    KW - LEARNING REGION

    KW - INNOVATION

    KW - SCALE

    KW - STATE

    KW - PERSPECTIVE

    KW - CRISIS

    U2 - 10.1177/09697764030104003

    DO - 10.1177/09697764030104003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 10

    SP - 325

    EP - 342

    JO - European Urban and Regional Studies

    JF - European Urban and Regional Studies

    SN - 0969-7764

    IS - 4

    ER -