Integrated aeroelastic and control analysis of wind turbine blades equipped with microtabs

Terence Macquart, Alireza Maheri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an investigation into the performance of different controllers in active load control of wind turbine blades equipped with microtabs. A bang-bang (BB) controller, a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) a proportional integral derivative (PID) and a sliding mode controller (SMC) are synthesised for load alleviation. The performance of the synthesised controllers in load alleviation is evaluated by employing WTAC (Wind Turbine Aeroelastic and Control), a wind turbine simulator incorporating an unsteady aerodynamic module, a structural analysis module and a control module. The variable-speed pitch-controlled NREL-5 MW is adopted as the case study. Using frequency domain analysis it is shown that for the studied case all controllers have more or less the same performance at rejecting the first rotational frequency loads. It is also shown that all controllers are more effective at rejecting loads with lower frequencies. BB and PID controllers, although capable of rejecting low frequency loads, may cause amplification of loads with higher frequencies. Investigating the performance of four controllers at different wind speeds for the studied wind turbine, it is observed that the effectiveness of BB and PID controllers reduces with wind speed but on the other hand SMC and LQR perform better at higher wind speeds. Introducing a new parameter, life index, the performance of different controllers in terms of the actuation wear is investigated. It is shown that LQR cause less actuation wear compared to SMC, while having comparable performance in load alleviation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)102-114
Number of pages13
JournalRenewable Energy
Volume75
Early online date10 Oct 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015

Fingerprint

Wind turbines
Turbomachine blades
Controllers
Derivatives
Wear of materials
Frequency domain analysis
Structural analysis
Amplification
Aerodynamics
Simulators

Keywords

  • WTAC
  • sliding mode control
  • linear quadratic control
  • bang-bang control
  • proportional integral device control

Cite this

Integrated aeroelastic and control analysis of wind turbine blades equipped with microtabs. / Macquart, Terence; Maheri, Alireza.

In: Renewable Energy, Vol. 75, 01.03.2015, p. 102-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{69564ffdbe914ea99ee403d0cf011d9c,
title = "Integrated aeroelastic and control analysis of wind turbine blades equipped with microtabs",
abstract = "This paper presents the results of an investigation into the performance of different controllers in active load control of wind turbine blades equipped with microtabs. A bang-bang (BB) controller, a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) a proportional integral derivative (PID) and a sliding mode controller (SMC) are synthesised for load alleviation. The performance of the synthesised controllers in load alleviation is evaluated by employing WTAC (Wind Turbine Aeroelastic and Control), a wind turbine simulator incorporating an unsteady aerodynamic module, a structural analysis module and a control module. The variable-speed pitch-controlled NREL-5 MW is adopted as the case study. Using frequency domain analysis it is shown that for the studied case all controllers have more or less the same performance at rejecting the first rotational frequency loads. It is also shown that all controllers are more effective at rejecting loads with lower frequencies. BB and PID controllers, although capable of rejecting low frequency loads, may cause amplification of loads with higher frequencies. Investigating the performance of four controllers at different wind speeds for the studied wind turbine, it is observed that the effectiveness of BB and PID controllers reduces with wind speed but on the other hand SMC and LQR perform better at higher wind speeds. Introducing a new parameter, life index, the performance of different controllers in terms of the actuation wear is investigated. It is shown that LQR cause less actuation wear compared to SMC, while having comparable performance in load alleviation.",
keywords = "WTAC, sliding mode control, linear quadratic control, bang-bang control, proportional integral device control",
author = "Terence Macquart and Alireza Maheri",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.032",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "102--114",
journal = "Renewable Energy",
issn = "0960-1481",
publisher = "PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrated aeroelastic and control analysis of wind turbine blades equipped with microtabs

AU - Macquart, Terence

AU - Maheri, Alireza

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - This paper presents the results of an investigation into the performance of different controllers in active load control of wind turbine blades equipped with microtabs. A bang-bang (BB) controller, a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) a proportional integral derivative (PID) and a sliding mode controller (SMC) are synthesised for load alleviation. The performance of the synthesised controllers in load alleviation is evaluated by employing WTAC (Wind Turbine Aeroelastic and Control), a wind turbine simulator incorporating an unsteady aerodynamic module, a structural analysis module and a control module. The variable-speed pitch-controlled NREL-5 MW is adopted as the case study. Using frequency domain analysis it is shown that for the studied case all controllers have more or less the same performance at rejecting the first rotational frequency loads. It is also shown that all controllers are more effective at rejecting loads with lower frequencies. BB and PID controllers, although capable of rejecting low frequency loads, may cause amplification of loads with higher frequencies. Investigating the performance of four controllers at different wind speeds for the studied wind turbine, it is observed that the effectiveness of BB and PID controllers reduces with wind speed but on the other hand SMC and LQR perform better at higher wind speeds. Introducing a new parameter, life index, the performance of different controllers in terms of the actuation wear is investigated. It is shown that LQR cause less actuation wear compared to SMC, while having comparable performance in load alleviation.

AB - This paper presents the results of an investigation into the performance of different controllers in active load control of wind turbine blades equipped with microtabs. A bang-bang (BB) controller, a linear quadratic regulator (LQR) a proportional integral derivative (PID) and a sliding mode controller (SMC) are synthesised for load alleviation. The performance of the synthesised controllers in load alleviation is evaluated by employing WTAC (Wind Turbine Aeroelastic and Control), a wind turbine simulator incorporating an unsteady aerodynamic module, a structural analysis module and a control module. The variable-speed pitch-controlled NREL-5 MW is adopted as the case study. Using frequency domain analysis it is shown that for the studied case all controllers have more or less the same performance at rejecting the first rotational frequency loads. It is also shown that all controllers are more effective at rejecting loads with lower frequencies. BB and PID controllers, although capable of rejecting low frequency loads, may cause amplification of loads with higher frequencies. Investigating the performance of four controllers at different wind speeds for the studied wind turbine, it is observed that the effectiveness of BB and PID controllers reduces with wind speed but on the other hand SMC and LQR perform better at higher wind speeds. Introducing a new parameter, life index, the performance of different controllers in terms of the actuation wear is investigated. It is shown that LQR cause less actuation wear compared to SMC, while having comparable performance in load alleviation.

KW - WTAC

KW - sliding mode control

KW - linear quadratic control

KW - bang-bang control

KW - proportional integral device control

U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.032

DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.032

M3 - Article

VL - 75

SP - 102

EP - 114

JO - Renewable Energy

JF - Renewable Energy

SN - 0960-1481

ER -