Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management

Christopher M. Raymond, Ioan Fazey, Mark Reed, Lindsay C. Stringer, Guy M. Robinson, Anna C. Evely

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

434 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper evaluates the processes and mechanisms available for integrating different types of knowledge for environmental management. Following a review of the challenges associated with knowledge integration, we present a series of questions for identifying, engaging, evaluating and applying different knowledges during project design and delivery. These questions are used as a basis to compare three environmental management projects that aimed to integrate knowledge from different sources in the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia. Comparative results indicate that integrating different types of knowledge is inherently complex - classification of knowledge is arbitrary and knowledge integration perspectives are qualitatively very different. We argue that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and encourage a shift in science from the development of knowledge integration products to the development of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes. These processes need to be systematic, reflexive and cyclic so that multiple views and multiple methods are considered in relation to an environmental management problem. The results have implications for the way in which researchers and environmental managers undertake and evaluate knowledge integration projects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1766-1777
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume91
Issue number8
Early online date22 Apr 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

Keywords

  • local knowledge
  • scientific knowledge
  • social learning
  • knowledge integration
  • participatory research
  • environmental management
  • traditional ecological knowledge
  • natural-resource management
  • sustainability science
  • land degradation
  • conservation
  • systems
  • farmers
  • quality
  • organizations
  • comanagement

Cite this

Raymond, C. M., Fazey, I., Reed, M., Stringer, L. C., Robinson, G. M., & Evely, A. C. (2010). Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1766-1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023

Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. / Raymond, Christopher M.; Fazey, Ioan; Reed, Mark; Stringer, Lindsay C.; Robinson, Guy M.; Evely, Anna C.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 91, No. 8, 08.2010, p. 1766-1777.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Raymond, CM, Fazey, I, Reed, M, Stringer, LC, Robinson, GM & Evely, AC 2010, 'Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management', Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 91, no. 8, pp. 1766-1777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023
Raymond, Christopher M. ; Fazey, Ioan ; Reed, Mark ; Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Robinson, Guy M. ; Evely, Anna C. / Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. In: Journal of Environmental Management. 2010 ; Vol. 91, No. 8. pp. 1766-1777.
@article{9d17657e407c4f83b69ab0a10f8f6a86,
title = "Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management",
abstract = "This paper evaluates the processes and mechanisms available for integrating different types of knowledge for environmental management. Following a review of the challenges associated with knowledge integration, we present a series of questions for identifying, engaging, evaluating and applying different knowledges during project design and delivery. These questions are used as a basis to compare three environmental management projects that aimed to integrate knowledge from different sources in the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia. Comparative results indicate that integrating different types of knowledge is inherently complex - classification of knowledge is arbitrary and knowledge integration perspectives are qualitatively very different. We argue that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and encourage a shift in science from the development of knowledge integration products to the development of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes. These processes need to be systematic, reflexive and cyclic so that multiple views and multiple methods are considered in relation to an environmental management problem. The results have implications for the way in which researchers and environmental managers undertake and evaluate knowledge integration projects.",
keywords = "local knowledge, scientific knowledge, social learning, knowledge integration, participatory research, environmental management, traditional ecological knowledge, natural-resource management, sustainability science, land degradation, conservation, systems, farmers, quality, organizations, comanagement",
author = "Raymond, {Christopher M.} and Ioan Fazey and Mark Reed and Stringer, {Lindsay C.} and Robinson, {Guy M.} and Evely, {Anna C.}",
year = "2010",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023",
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "1766--1777",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management

AU - Raymond, Christopher M.

AU - Fazey, Ioan

AU - Reed, Mark

AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

AU - Robinson, Guy M.

AU - Evely, Anna C.

PY - 2010/8

Y1 - 2010/8

N2 - This paper evaluates the processes and mechanisms available for integrating different types of knowledge for environmental management. Following a review of the challenges associated with knowledge integration, we present a series of questions for identifying, engaging, evaluating and applying different knowledges during project design and delivery. These questions are used as a basis to compare three environmental management projects that aimed to integrate knowledge from different sources in the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia. Comparative results indicate that integrating different types of knowledge is inherently complex - classification of knowledge is arbitrary and knowledge integration perspectives are qualitatively very different. We argue that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and encourage a shift in science from the development of knowledge integration products to the development of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes. These processes need to be systematic, reflexive and cyclic so that multiple views and multiple methods are considered in relation to an environmental management problem. The results have implications for the way in which researchers and environmental managers undertake and evaluate knowledge integration projects.

AB - This paper evaluates the processes and mechanisms available for integrating different types of knowledge for environmental management. Following a review of the challenges associated with knowledge integration, we present a series of questions for identifying, engaging, evaluating and applying different knowledges during project design and delivery. These questions are used as a basis to compare three environmental management projects that aimed to integrate knowledge from different sources in the United Kingdom, Solomon Islands and Australia. Comparative results indicate that integrating different types of knowledge is inherently complex - classification of knowledge is arbitrary and knowledge integration perspectives are qualitatively very different. We argue that there is no single optimum approach for integrating local and scientific knowledge and encourage a shift in science from the development of knowledge integration products to the development of problem-focussed, knowledge integration processes. These processes need to be systematic, reflexive and cyclic so that multiple views and multiple methods are considered in relation to an environmental management problem. The results have implications for the way in which researchers and environmental managers undertake and evaluate knowledge integration projects.

KW - local knowledge

KW - scientific knowledge

KW - social learning

KW - knowledge integration

KW - participatory research

KW - environmental management

KW - traditional ecological knowledge

KW - natural-resource management

KW - sustainability science

KW - land degradation

KW - conservation

KW - systems

KW - farmers

KW - quality

KW - organizations

KW - comanagement

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.023

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 1766

EP - 1777

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

IS - 8

ER -