Integrative studies on rural landscapes: Policy expectations and research practice

Barbel Tress, Gunther Tress, G. Fry

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    105 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    During the 1990s, integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) approaches gained increasing importance for rural landscape studies and numbers of such projects rose. However, it is not clear, what funding agencies expect from integrative projects, how researchers make them operational and what their outputs are. To identify policy expectations and research practice, we did a literature review and conducted standardised interviews with funding agencies, researchers, and project leaders. Results revealed that funding agencies have varying understandings of interdisciplinarity. They set up interdisciplinary programs not primarily to achieve scientific progress but to solve societal and environmental problems. Regarding publication output, peer-reviewed papers are preferred before research reports. Funding agencies seldom give practical advice to projects on how to meet their demands. Researchers frame project objectives in terms of their problem solving capacity. Although perceiving lack of common operational understanding of interdisciplinarity as a problem, researchers do not arrive at a common terminology. As barriers to integration we identified the spatial distance between researchers, project meetings, and management problems. Researchers perceive a tension between the applied character of the projects and the scientific expectations placed on them. Funding-agencies' expectations are hardly known to researchers. We recommend greater dialogue between funding agencies and researchers especially regarding interdisciplinary objectives, problems and solutions. We suggest paying greater attention to the organisation and management of research to assure the necessary support for integrative research teams. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)177-191
    Number of pages14
    JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
    Volume70
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005

    Keywords

    • landscape
    • research policy
    • research funding
    • interdisciplinarity
    • transdisciplinarity
    • INTERDISCIPLINARY
    • MANAGEMENT
    • SCIENCE
    • CHALLENGES
    • ECOLOGY

    Cite this

    Integrative studies on rural landscapes: Policy expectations and research practice. / Tress, Barbel; Tress, Gunther; Fry, G.

    In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 70, 01.2005, p. 177-191.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Tress, Barbel ; Tress, Gunther ; Fry, G. / Integrative studies on rural landscapes: Policy expectations and research practice. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2005 ; Vol. 70. pp. 177-191.
    @article{380d84d4a20047da96e3c77d4a633b50,
    title = "Integrative studies on rural landscapes: Policy expectations and research practice",
    abstract = "During the 1990s, integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) approaches gained increasing importance for rural landscape studies and numbers of such projects rose. However, it is not clear, what funding agencies expect from integrative projects, how researchers make them operational and what their outputs are. To identify policy expectations and research practice, we did a literature review and conducted standardised interviews with funding agencies, researchers, and project leaders. Results revealed that funding agencies have varying understandings of interdisciplinarity. They set up interdisciplinary programs not primarily to achieve scientific progress but to solve societal and environmental problems. Regarding publication output, peer-reviewed papers are preferred before research reports. Funding agencies seldom give practical advice to projects on how to meet their demands. Researchers frame project objectives in terms of their problem solving capacity. Although perceiving lack of common operational understanding of interdisciplinarity as a problem, researchers do not arrive at a common terminology. As barriers to integration we identified the spatial distance between researchers, project meetings, and management problems. Researchers perceive a tension between the applied character of the projects and the scientific expectations placed on them. Funding-agencies' expectations are hardly known to researchers. We recommend greater dialogue between funding agencies and researchers especially regarding interdisciplinary objectives, problems and solutions. We suggest paying greater attention to the organisation and management of research to assure the necessary support for integrative research teams. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
    keywords = "landscape, research policy, research funding, interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, INTERDISCIPLINARY, MANAGEMENT, SCIENCE, CHALLENGES, ECOLOGY",
    author = "Barbel Tress and Gunther Tress and G. Fry",
    year = "2005",
    month = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.013",
    language = "English",
    volume = "70",
    pages = "177--191",
    journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
    issn = "0169-2046",
    publisher = "Elsevier",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Integrative studies on rural landscapes: Policy expectations and research practice

    AU - Tress, Barbel

    AU - Tress, Gunther

    AU - Fry, G.

    PY - 2005/1

    Y1 - 2005/1

    N2 - During the 1990s, integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) approaches gained increasing importance for rural landscape studies and numbers of such projects rose. However, it is not clear, what funding agencies expect from integrative projects, how researchers make them operational and what their outputs are. To identify policy expectations and research practice, we did a literature review and conducted standardised interviews with funding agencies, researchers, and project leaders. Results revealed that funding agencies have varying understandings of interdisciplinarity. They set up interdisciplinary programs not primarily to achieve scientific progress but to solve societal and environmental problems. Regarding publication output, peer-reviewed papers are preferred before research reports. Funding agencies seldom give practical advice to projects on how to meet their demands. Researchers frame project objectives in terms of their problem solving capacity. Although perceiving lack of common operational understanding of interdisciplinarity as a problem, researchers do not arrive at a common terminology. As barriers to integration we identified the spatial distance between researchers, project meetings, and management problems. Researchers perceive a tension between the applied character of the projects and the scientific expectations placed on them. Funding-agencies' expectations are hardly known to researchers. We recommend greater dialogue between funding agencies and researchers especially regarding interdisciplinary objectives, problems and solutions. We suggest paying greater attention to the organisation and management of research to assure the necessary support for integrative research teams. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    AB - During the 1990s, integrative (interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) approaches gained increasing importance for rural landscape studies and numbers of such projects rose. However, it is not clear, what funding agencies expect from integrative projects, how researchers make them operational and what their outputs are. To identify policy expectations and research practice, we did a literature review and conducted standardised interviews with funding agencies, researchers, and project leaders. Results revealed that funding agencies have varying understandings of interdisciplinarity. They set up interdisciplinary programs not primarily to achieve scientific progress but to solve societal and environmental problems. Regarding publication output, peer-reviewed papers are preferred before research reports. Funding agencies seldom give practical advice to projects on how to meet their demands. Researchers frame project objectives in terms of their problem solving capacity. Although perceiving lack of common operational understanding of interdisciplinarity as a problem, researchers do not arrive at a common terminology. As barriers to integration we identified the spatial distance between researchers, project meetings, and management problems. Researchers perceive a tension between the applied character of the projects and the scientific expectations placed on them. Funding-agencies' expectations are hardly known to researchers. We recommend greater dialogue between funding agencies and researchers especially regarding interdisciplinary objectives, problems and solutions. We suggest paying greater attention to the organisation and management of research to assure the necessary support for integrative research teams. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

    KW - landscape

    KW - research policy

    KW - research funding

    KW - interdisciplinarity

    KW - transdisciplinarity

    KW - INTERDISCIPLINARY

    KW - MANAGEMENT

    KW - SCIENCE

    KW - CHALLENGES

    KW - ECOLOGY

    U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.013

    DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.013

    M3 - Article

    VL - 70

    SP - 177

    EP - 191

    JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

    JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

    SN - 0169-2046

    ER -