Interpretation and knowledge maximization

Aidan McGlynn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)


Timothy Williamson has proposed that we should give a ‘knowledge first’ twist to David Lewis’s account of content, maintaining that for P to be the content of one’s belief is for P to be the content that would be attributed by an idealized interpreter working under certain constraints, and that the fundamental constraint on interpretation is a principle of knowledge maximization. According to this principle, an interpretation is correct to the extent that it maximizes the number of knowledgeable judgments the subject comes out as making. Here I will argue against knowledge maximization and two fallback positions suggested by Williamson’s discussion. Williamson intends the principle of knowledge maximization to form the basis of an argument against a certain sort of skepticism about judgment. In the final section I argue that the kind of general response to judgment skepticism envisaged by Williamson is neither desirable nor necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)391-405
Number of pages16
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Issue number3
Early online date9 Apr 2011
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2012


  • interpretation
  • reference
  • content
  • knowledge
  • skepticism


Dive into the research topics of 'Interpretation and knowledge maximization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this