Interpreting structural geometry in fold-thrust belts

Why style matters

Robert W H Butler (Corresponding Author), Clare E Bond, Mark A Cooper, Hannah Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Structural interpretation in fold-thrust belts has become reliant on a few idealized geometric models (i.e. fault-bend, fault-propagation and detachment folding) and their quantitative methods for section construction and validation.

We couple historical review with selected outcrops to show that there is a substantially greater range of solutions available for interpreting the geometry and evolution of thrust belt structures than implied by these idealized models.

Examples are documented, and lessons drawn, from comparing structural interpretations developed in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies with those in the Western Alps. Both show a range of structural geometries with regional variations that reflect variations in the pre-kinematic stratigraphic template. Locally, fold-thrust development can localize on pre-existing structures. Thus consideration of the precursor geology is essential for structural interpretation. Using a case study from the Papuan Fold Belt we show that even with seismic data, assessing the role of basement in structural development can be uncertain.

The idealized models offer only a narrow range of possible geometries for constructing cross-sections and developing structural understanding in fold-thrust systems. Failure to consider alternatives, and the inherent interpretation uncertainty, has biased understanding of thrust systems leading in turn to over-optimistic risk assessment and repeated drilling surprises.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)251-273
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Structural Geology
Volume114
Early online date23 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2018

Fingerprint

thrust
fold
geometry
fault propagation
fold belt
folding
seismic data
outcrop
risk assessment
cross section
kinematics
drilling
geology

Keywords

  • thrust belts
  • folding
  • interpretation uncertainty
  • fold thrust structures

Cite this

Interpreting structural geometry in fold-thrust belts : Why style matters. / Butler, Robert W H (Corresponding Author); Bond, Clare E; Cooper, Mark A; Watkins, Hannah.

In: Journal of Structural Geology, Vol. 114, 09.2018, p. 251-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47a089b9119d4d32a4d02188bcc6c466,
title = "Interpreting structural geometry in fold-thrust belts: Why style matters",
abstract = "Structural interpretation in fold-thrust belts has become reliant on a few idealized geometric models (i.e. fault-bend, fault-propagation and detachment folding) and their quantitative methods for section construction and validation.We couple historical review with selected outcrops to show that there is a substantially greater range of solutions available for interpreting the geometry and evolution of thrust belt structures than implied by these idealized models.Examples are documented, and lessons drawn, from comparing structural interpretations developed in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies with those in the Western Alps. Both show a range of structural geometries with regional variations that reflect variations in the pre-kinematic stratigraphic template. Locally, fold-thrust development can localize on pre-existing structures. Thus consideration of the precursor geology is essential for structural interpretation. Using a case study from the Papuan Fold Belt we show that even with seismic data, assessing the role of basement in structural development can be uncertain.The idealized models offer only a narrow range of possible geometries for constructing cross-sections and developing structural understanding in fold-thrust systems. Failure to consider alternatives, and the inherent interpretation uncertainty, has biased understanding of thrust systems leading in turn to over-optimistic risk assessment and repeated drilling surprises.",
keywords = "thrust belts, folding, interpretation uncertainty, fold thrust structures",
author = "Butler, {Robert W H} and Bond, {Clare E} and Cooper, {Mark A} and Hannah Watkins",
note = "The Fold-Thrust Research Group is funded by InterOil, Oil Search and Santos. We thank David Ferrill and Chris Morley for robust reviews of an early draft of this paper. We also thank Bill Dunne for his patience and his usual editorial rigor – although of course authors alone are responsible for the views expressed here.",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsg.2018.06.019",
language = "English",
volume = "114",
pages = "251--273",
journal = "Journal of Structural Geology",
issn = "0191-8141",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpreting structural geometry in fold-thrust belts

T2 - Why style matters

AU - Butler, Robert W H

AU - Bond, Clare E

AU - Cooper, Mark A

AU - Watkins, Hannah

N1 - The Fold-Thrust Research Group is funded by InterOil, Oil Search and Santos. We thank David Ferrill and Chris Morley for robust reviews of an early draft of this paper. We also thank Bill Dunne for his patience and his usual editorial rigor – although of course authors alone are responsible for the views expressed here.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Structural interpretation in fold-thrust belts has become reliant on a few idealized geometric models (i.e. fault-bend, fault-propagation and detachment folding) and their quantitative methods for section construction and validation.We couple historical review with selected outcrops to show that there is a substantially greater range of solutions available for interpreting the geometry and evolution of thrust belt structures than implied by these idealized models.Examples are documented, and lessons drawn, from comparing structural interpretations developed in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies with those in the Western Alps. Both show a range of structural geometries with regional variations that reflect variations in the pre-kinematic stratigraphic template. Locally, fold-thrust development can localize on pre-existing structures. Thus consideration of the precursor geology is essential for structural interpretation. Using a case study from the Papuan Fold Belt we show that even with seismic data, assessing the role of basement in structural development can be uncertain.The idealized models offer only a narrow range of possible geometries for constructing cross-sections and developing structural understanding in fold-thrust systems. Failure to consider alternatives, and the inherent interpretation uncertainty, has biased understanding of thrust systems leading in turn to over-optimistic risk assessment and repeated drilling surprises.

AB - Structural interpretation in fold-thrust belts has become reliant on a few idealized geometric models (i.e. fault-bend, fault-propagation and detachment folding) and their quantitative methods for section construction and validation.We couple historical review with selected outcrops to show that there is a substantially greater range of solutions available for interpreting the geometry and evolution of thrust belt structures than implied by these idealized models.Examples are documented, and lessons drawn, from comparing structural interpretations developed in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies with those in the Western Alps. Both show a range of structural geometries with regional variations that reflect variations in the pre-kinematic stratigraphic template. Locally, fold-thrust development can localize on pre-existing structures. Thus consideration of the precursor geology is essential for structural interpretation. Using a case study from the Papuan Fold Belt we show that even with seismic data, assessing the role of basement in structural development can be uncertain.The idealized models offer only a narrow range of possible geometries for constructing cross-sections and developing structural understanding in fold-thrust systems. Failure to consider alternatives, and the inherent interpretation uncertainty, has biased understanding of thrust systems leading in turn to over-optimistic risk assessment and repeated drilling surprises.

KW - thrust belts

KW - folding

KW - interpretation uncertainty

KW - fold thrust structures

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.06.019

DO - 10.1016/j.jsg.2018.06.019

M3 - Article

VL - 114

SP - 251

EP - 273

JO - Journal of Structural Geology

JF - Journal of Structural Geology

SN - 0191-8141

ER -