Interviewing techniques and the psycholiguistic assessment of statement credibility

C. Hitchcock, K. Howells, Amina Memon

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    70 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The objective of this study is the development of an applicable comprehensive questioning and statement analysis procedure. One hundred and thirty-six male residents of the Wynne Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division (TDCJ - ID) witnessed a staged theft, and provided testimony. Interview formats followed semi-standardized scripts derived from Structured Interview, Inferential Interview and Cognitive Interview techniques. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six experimental conditions in a 2(honesty of reporting) x 3(interview technique) matrix. Results found a 62% classification accuracy for the Structured Interview, 68% for the Cognitive Interview and 82% for the Inferential Interview, when comparisons were made between treatment phases of each interview condition. When responses given to each interview segment were analysed, 83% of the Structured Interview transcripts were correctly identified, as were 91% of the Inferential and 92.9% of the Cognitive Interview statements. The desire to prevaricate while escaping detection produced statements which were systematically different from honest reporting, as seen in the variables of coherence, response length, type-token ratio, and verbal hedges. These results indicate a potential forensic utility for strategies which attempt to detect deception through a combination of qualitative and quantitative statement characteristics, and underscore the need for systematic, question-by-question analysis of eyewitness statements. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)287-300
    Number of pages13
    JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Keywords

    • INFORMATION MANIPULATION THEORY
    • EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION
    • DETECTING DECEPTION
    • CONFIDENCE
    • BEHAVIOR
    • ACCURACY
    • ISSUES
    • MEMORY
    • BODY
    • FACE

    Cite this

    Interviewing techniques and the psycholiguistic assessment of statement credibility. / Hitchcock, C.; Howells, K.; Memon, Amina.

    In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2002, p. 287-300.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Hitchcock, C. ; Howells, K. ; Memon, Amina. / Interviewing techniques and the psycholiguistic assessment of statement credibility. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 287-300.
    @article{c48a4899c6a7411eb6ff01c0478d4ceb,
    title = "Interviewing techniques and the psycholiguistic assessment of statement credibility",
    abstract = "The objective of this study is the development of an applicable comprehensive questioning and statement analysis procedure. One hundred and thirty-six male residents of the Wynne Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division (TDCJ - ID) witnessed a staged theft, and provided testimony. Interview formats followed semi-standardized scripts derived from Structured Interview, Inferential Interview and Cognitive Interview techniques. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six experimental conditions in a 2(honesty of reporting) x 3(interview technique) matrix. Results found a 62{\%} classification accuracy for the Structured Interview, 68{\%} for the Cognitive Interview and 82{\%} for the Inferential Interview, when comparisons were made between treatment phases of each interview condition. When responses given to each interview segment were analysed, 83{\%} of the Structured Interview transcripts were correctly identified, as were 91{\%} of the Inferential and 92.9{\%} of the Cognitive Interview statements. The desire to prevaricate while escaping detection produced statements which were systematically different from honest reporting, as seen in the variables of coherence, response length, type-token ratio, and verbal hedges. These results indicate a potential forensic utility for strategies which attempt to detect deception through a combination of qualitative and quantitative statement characteristics, and underscore the need for systematic, question-by-question analysis of eyewitness statements. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.",
    keywords = "INFORMATION MANIPULATION THEORY, EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION, DETECTING DECEPTION, CONFIDENCE, BEHAVIOR, ACCURACY, ISSUES, MEMORY, BODY, FACE",
    author = "C. Hitchcock and K. Howells and Amina Memon",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1002/acp.788",
    language = "English",
    volume = "16",
    pages = "287--300",
    journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
    issn = "0888-4080",
    publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Interviewing techniques and the psycholiguistic assessment of statement credibility

    AU - Hitchcock, C.

    AU - Howells, K.

    AU - Memon, Amina

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - The objective of this study is the development of an applicable comprehensive questioning and statement analysis procedure. One hundred and thirty-six male residents of the Wynne Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division (TDCJ - ID) witnessed a staged theft, and provided testimony. Interview formats followed semi-standardized scripts derived from Structured Interview, Inferential Interview and Cognitive Interview techniques. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six experimental conditions in a 2(honesty of reporting) x 3(interview technique) matrix. Results found a 62% classification accuracy for the Structured Interview, 68% for the Cognitive Interview and 82% for the Inferential Interview, when comparisons were made between treatment phases of each interview condition. When responses given to each interview segment were analysed, 83% of the Structured Interview transcripts were correctly identified, as were 91% of the Inferential and 92.9% of the Cognitive Interview statements. The desire to prevaricate while escaping detection produced statements which were systematically different from honest reporting, as seen in the variables of coherence, response length, type-token ratio, and verbal hedges. These results indicate a potential forensic utility for strategies which attempt to detect deception through a combination of qualitative and quantitative statement characteristics, and underscore the need for systematic, question-by-question analysis of eyewitness statements. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

    AB - The objective of this study is the development of an applicable comprehensive questioning and statement analysis procedure. One hundred and thirty-six male residents of the Wynne Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Institutional Division (TDCJ - ID) witnessed a staged theft, and provided testimony. Interview formats followed semi-standardized scripts derived from Structured Interview, Inferential Interview and Cognitive Interview techniques. Participants were randomly assigned to one of six experimental conditions in a 2(honesty of reporting) x 3(interview technique) matrix. Results found a 62% classification accuracy for the Structured Interview, 68% for the Cognitive Interview and 82% for the Inferential Interview, when comparisons were made between treatment phases of each interview condition. When responses given to each interview segment were analysed, 83% of the Structured Interview transcripts were correctly identified, as were 91% of the Inferential and 92.9% of the Cognitive Interview statements. The desire to prevaricate while escaping detection produced statements which were systematically different from honest reporting, as seen in the variables of coherence, response length, type-token ratio, and verbal hedges. These results indicate a potential forensic utility for strategies which attempt to detect deception through a combination of qualitative and quantitative statement characteristics, and underscore the need for systematic, question-by-question analysis of eyewitness statements. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

    KW - INFORMATION MANIPULATION THEORY

    KW - EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION

    KW - DETECTING DECEPTION

    KW - CONFIDENCE

    KW - BEHAVIOR

    KW - ACCURACY

    KW - ISSUES

    KW - MEMORY

    KW - BODY

    KW - FACE

    U2 - 10.1002/acp.788

    DO - 10.1002/acp.788

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    SP - 287

    EP - 300

    JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

    JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

    SN - 0888-4080

    IS - 3

    ER -