Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator's theoretical views

D. Reisberg, David Graham Pearson, S. M. Kosslyn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

127 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Early in a scientific debate, before much evidence has accumulated, why are some scientists inclined toward one position and other scientists toward the opposite position? We explore this issue with a focus on scientists' views of the 'imagery debate' that unfolded in Cognitive Science during the late 1970s and early 1980s. We examine the possibility that, during the early years of this debate, researchers' views were shaped by their own conscious experiences with imagery. Consistent with this suggestion, a survey of 150 psychologists, philosophers, and neuroscientists showed that those who experienced their own visual imagery as vivid and picture-like recall being more sympathetic in 1980 to the view that, in general, images are picture-like. Similarly, those who have vivid images and who regularly use their images in cognition were more inclined to believe that issues of image vividness deserve more research. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)147-160
Number of pages13
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume17
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Keywords

  • VISUAL-IMAGERY
  • MEMORY

Cite this

Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator's theoretical views. / Reisberg, D.; Pearson, David Graham; Kosslyn, S. M.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 17, 2003, p. 147-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a32d3ad6e6d84e4d8e3bff7cb246d846,
title = "Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator's theoretical views",
abstract = "Early in a scientific debate, before much evidence has accumulated, why are some scientists inclined toward one position and other scientists toward the opposite position? We explore this issue with a focus on scientists' views of the 'imagery debate' that unfolded in Cognitive Science during the late 1970s and early 1980s. We examine the possibility that, during the early years of this debate, researchers' views were shaped by their own conscious experiences with imagery. Consistent with this suggestion, a survey of 150 psychologists, philosophers, and neuroscientists showed that those who experienced their own visual imagery as vivid and picture-like recall being more sympathetic in 1980 to the view that, in general, images are picture-like. Similarly, those who have vivid images and who regularly use their images in cognition were more inclined to believe that issues of image vividness deserve more research. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "VISUAL-IMAGERY, MEMORY",
author = "D. Reisberg and Pearson, {David Graham} and Kosslyn, {S. M.}",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1002/acp.858",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "147--160",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Intuitions and introspections about imagery: The role of imagery experience in shaping an investigator's theoretical views

AU - Reisberg, D.

AU - Pearson, David Graham

AU - Kosslyn, S. M.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Early in a scientific debate, before much evidence has accumulated, why are some scientists inclined toward one position and other scientists toward the opposite position? We explore this issue with a focus on scientists' views of the 'imagery debate' that unfolded in Cognitive Science during the late 1970s and early 1980s. We examine the possibility that, during the early years of this debate, researchers' views were shaped by their own conscious experiences with imagery. Consistent with this suggestion, a survey of 150 psychologists, philosophers, and neuroscientists showed that those who experienced their own visual imagery as vivid and picture-like recall being more sympathetic in 1980 to the view that, in general, images are picture-like. Similarly, those who have vivid images and who regularly use their images in cognition were more inclined to believe that issues of image vividness deserve more research. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

AB - Early in a scientific debate, before much evidence has accumulated, why are some scientists inclined toward one position and other scientists toward the opposite position? We explore this issue with a focus on scientists' views of the 'imagery debate' that unfolded in Cognitive Science during the late 1970s and early 1980s. We examine the possibility that, during the early years of this debate, researchers' views were shaped by their own conscious experiences with imagery. Consistent with this suggestion, a survey of 150 psychologists, philosophers, and neuroscientists showed that those who experienced their own visual imagery as vivid and picture-like recall being more sympathetic in 1980 to the view that, in general, images are picture-like. Similarly, those who have vivid images and who regularly use their images in cognition were more inclined to believe that issues of image vividness deserve more research. Copyright (C) 2002 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.

KW - VISUAL-IMAGERY

KW - MEMORY

U2 - 10.1002/acp.858

DO - 10.1002/acp.858

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 147

EP - 160

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

ER -