Inversion structures in a foreland domain

Seismic examples from the Italian Adriatic Sea

Paolo Pace (Corresponding Author), Vittorio Scisciani, Fernando Calamita, Robert W. H. Butler, David Iacopini, Paolo Esestime, Neil Hodgson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Positive structural inversion within foreland domains ahead of thrust belts can create structures with significant hydrocarbon potential in mature and underexplored areas. Within this context, the Adriatic region represents a well-established hydrocarbon province constituting a foreland domain bounded by the Apennines, Southern Alps, and Dinaric fold-and-thrust belts. Newly reprocessed regional 2D seismic data and a renewed exploration interest in the area motivate a reappraisal of the regional structure and stratigraphy of the deformed Central Adriatic region of Italy (i.e., the Mid-Adriatic Ridge). Here, we developed and discussed examples of inversion structures that have different structural styles. The structural interpretations displayed on time-to-depth converted profiles had been validated by 2D structural-kinematic balancing and forward modeling. Our aim was to better define the geometry, style, and timing of the analyzed inversion-related folds. Positive inversion structures appeared locally as asymmetric harpoon-shaped anticlines riding over high-angle blind thrusts. More commonly, inversion structures were symmetric anticlines formed above conjugate faults. Retrodeformed cross sections showed that positive inversion involved symmetric graben and asymmetric half-graben that originated during the Triassic and Jurassic. That these inversion structures developed during basement-involved thrusting, as suggested for the Adriatic in general, was consistent with forward modeling. Regionally, the contractional structures belonging to the Mid-Adriatic Ridge can be explained in terms of intraplate deformation that chiefly acted through reactivation of Mesozoic normal faults

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)SAA161-SAA176
Number of pages16
JournalInterpretation
Volume3
Issue number4
Early online date7 Oct 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2015

Fingerprint

Adriatic Sea
inversions
thrust
anticlines
forward modeling
anticline
graben
ridges
hydrocarbons
hydrocarbon
stratigraphy
fold and thrust belt
inversion
sea
basements
reactivation
Italy
normal fault
seismic data
Triassic

Keywords

  • tectonics
  • faults
  • 2D
  • seismic attributes
  • interpretation

Cite this

Pace, P., Scisciani, V., Calamita, F., Butler, R. W. H., Iacopini, D., Esestime, P., & Hodgson, N. (2015). Inversion structures in a foreland domain: Seismic examples from the Italian Adriatic Sea. Interpretation, 3(4), SAA161-SAA176. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2015-0013.1

Inversion structures in a foreland domain : Seismic examples from the Italian Adriatic Sea. / Pace, Paolo (Corresponding Author); Scisciani, Vittorio; Calamita, Fernando; Butler, Robert W. H.; Iacopini, David; Esestime, Paolo; Hodgson, Neil.

In: Interpretation, Vol. 3, No. 4, 11.2015, p. SAA161-SAA176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pace, P, Scisciani, V, Calamita, F, Butler, RWH, Iacopini, D, Esestime, P & Hodgson, N 2015, 'Inversion structures in a foreland domain: Seismic examples from the Italian Adriatic Sea', Interpretation, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. SAA161-SAA176. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2015-0013.1
Pace, Paolo ; Scisciani, Vittorio ; Calamita, Fernando ; Butler, Robert W. H. ; Iacopini, David ; Esestime, Paolo ; Hodgson, Neil. / Inversion structures in a foreland domain : Seismic examples from the Italian Adriatic Sea. In: Interpretation. 2015 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. SAA161-SAA176.
@article{4b17e96e957c41e1b82a79d1783c1b5c,
title = "Inversion structures in a foreland domain: Seismic examples from the Italian Adriatic Sea",
abstract = "Positive structural inversion within foreland domains ahead of thrust belts can create structures with significant hydrocarbon potential in mature and underexplored areas. Within this context, the Adriatic region represents a well-established hydrocarbon province constituting a foreland domain bounded by the Apennines, Southern Alps, and Dinaric fold-and-thrust belts. Newly reprocessed regional 2D seismic data and a renewed exploration interest in the area motivate a reappraisal of the regional structure and stratigraphy of the deformed Central Adriatic region of Italy (i.e., the Mid-Adriatic Ridge). Here, we developed and discussed examples of inversion structures that have different structural styles. The structural interpretations displayed on time-to-depth converted profiles had been validated by 2D structural-kinematic balancing and forward modeling. Our aim was to better define the geometry, style, and timing of the analyzed inversion-related folds. Positive inversion structures appeared locally as asymmetric harpoon-shaped anticlines riding over high-angle blind thrusts. More commonly, inversion structures were symmetric anticlines formed above conjugate faults. Retrodeformed cross sections showed that positive inversion involved symmetric graben and asymmetric half-graben that originated during the Triassic and Jurassic. That these inversion structures developed during basement-involved thrusting, as suggested for the Adriatic in general, was consistent with forward modeling. Regionally, the contractional structures belonging to the Mid-Adriatic Ridge can be explained in terms of intraplate deformation that chiefly acted through reactivation of Mesozoic normal faults",
keywords = "tectonics, faults , 2D, seismic attributes, interpretation",
author = "Paolo Pace and Vittorio Scisciani and Fernando Calamita and Butler, {Robert W. H.} and David Iacopini and Paolo Esestime and Neil Hodgson",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1190/INT-2015-0013.1",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "SAA161--SAA176",
journal = "Interpretation",
issn = "2324-8858",
publisher = "Society of Exploration Geophysicists",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Inversion structures in a foreland domain

T2 - Seismic examples from the Italian Adriatic Sea

AU - Pace, Paolo

AU - Scisciani, Vittorio

AU - Calamita, Fernando

AU - Butler, Robert W. H.

AU - Iacopini, David

AU - Esestime, Paolo

AU - Hodgson, Neil

PY - 2015/11

Y1 - 2015/11

N2 - Positive structural inversion within foreland domains ahead of thrust belts can create structures with significant hydrocarbon potential in mature and underexplored areas. Within this context, the Adriatic region represents a well-established hydrocarbon province constituting a foreland domain bounded by the Apennines, Southern Alps, and Dinaric fold-and-thrust belts. Newly reprocessed regional 2D seismic data and a renewed exploration interest in the area motivate a reappraisal of the regional structure and stratigraphy of the deformed Central Adriatic region of Italy (i.e., the Mid-Adriatic Ridge). Here, we developed and discussed examples of inversion structures that have different structural styles. The structural interpretations displayed on time-to-depth converted profiles had been validated by 2D structural-kinematic balancing and forward modeling. Our aim was to better define the geometry, style, and timing of the analyzed inversion-related folds. Positive inversion structures appeared locally as asymmetric harpoon-shaped anticlines riding over high-angle blind thrusts. More commonly, inversion structures were symmetric anticlines formed above conjugate faults. Retrodeformed cross sections showed that positive inversion involved symmetric graben and asymmetric half-graben that originated during the Triassic and Jurassic. That these inversion structures developed during basement-involved thrusting, as suggested for the Adriatic in general, was consistent with forward modeling. Regionally, the contractional structures belonging to the Mid-Adriatic Ridge can be explained in terms of intraplate deformation that chiefly acted through reactivation of Mesozoic normal faults

AB - Positive structural inversion within foreland domains ahead of thrust belts can create structures with significant hydrocarbon potential in mature and underexplored areas. Within this context, the Adriatic region represents a well-established hydrocarbon province constituting a foreland domain bounded by the Apennines, Southern Alps, and Dinaric fold-and-thrust belts. Newly reprocessed regional 2D seismic data and a renewed exploration interest in the area motivate a reappraisal of the regional structure and stratigraphy of the deformed Central Adriatic region of Italy (i.e., the Mid-Adriatic Ridge). Here, we developed and discussed examples of inversion structures that have different structural styles. The structural interpretations displayed on time-to-depth converted profiles had been validated by 2D structural-kinematic balancing and forward modeling. Our aim was to better define the geometry, style, and timing of the analyzed inversion-related folds. Positive inversion structures appeared locally as asymmetric harpoon-shaped anticlines riding over high-angle blind thrusts. More commonly, inversion structures were symmetric anticlines formed above conjugate faults. Retrodeformed cross sections showed that positive inversion involved symmetric graben and asymmetric half-graben that originated during the Triassic and Jurassic. That these inversion structures developed during basement-involved thrusting, as suggested for the Adriatic in general, was consistent with forward modeling. Regionally, the contractional structures belonging to the Mid-Adriatic Ridge can be explained in terms of intraplate deformation that chiefly acted through reactivation of Mesozoic normal faults

KW - tectonics

KW - faults

KW - 2D

KW - seismic attributes

KW - interpretation

U2 - 10.1190/INT-2015-0013.1

DO - 10.1190/INT-2015-0013.1

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - SAA161-SAA176

JO - Interpretation

JF - Interpretation

SN - 2324-8858

IS - 4

ER -