Investigating brain response to music

A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes

Karsten Mueller, Toralf Mildner, Thomas Fritz, Joeran Lepsien, Christian Schwarzbauer, Matthias L. Schroeter, Harald E. Moeller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in auditory experiments is a challenge, because the scanning procedure produces considerable noise that can interfere with the auditory paradigm. The noise might either mask the auditory material presented, or interfere with stimuli designed to evoke emotions because it sounds loud and rather unpleasant. Therefore, scanning paradigms that allow interleaved auditory stimulation and image acquisition appear to be advantageous. The sparse temporal sampling (STS) technique uses a very long repetition time in order to achieve a stimulus presentation in the absence of scanner noise. Although only relatively few volumes are acquired for the resulting data sets, there have been recent studies where this method has furthered remarkable results. A new development is the interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) technique. Compared with STS, this method is capable of acquiring several volumes in the time frame between the auditory trials (while the magnetization is kept in a steady state during stimulus presentation).

In order to draw conclusions about the optimum fMRI procedure with auditory stimulation, different echo-planar imaging (EPI) acquisition schemes were compared: Continuous scanning, STS, and ISSS. The total acquisition time of each sequence was adjusted to about 12.5 min. The results indicate that the ISSS approach exhibits the highest sensitivity in detecting subtle activity in sub-cortical brain regions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)337-343
Number of pages7
JournalNeuroimage
Volume54
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

Keywords

  • Scanner background-noise
  • event-related FMRI
  • auditory-cortex
  • functional MRI
  • acoustic noise
  • bold response
  • emotion
  • time
  • hippocampus
  • inference

Cite this

Mueller, K., Mildner, T., Fritz, T., Lepsien, J., Schwarzbauer, C., Schroeter, M. L., & Moeller, H. E. (2011). Investigating brain response to music: A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes. Neuroimage, 54(1), 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.029

Investigating brain response to music : A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes. / Mueller, Karsten; Mildner, Toralf; Fritz, Thomas; Lepsien, Joeran; Schwarzbauer, Christian; Schroeter, Matthias L.; Moeller, Harald E.

In: Neuroimage, Vol. 54, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 337-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mueller, K, Mildner, T, Fritz, T, Lepsien, J, Schwarzbauer, C, Schroeter, ML & Moeller, HE 2011, 'Investigating brain response to music: A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes', Neuroimage, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.029
Mueller K, Mildner T, Fritz T, Lepsien J, Schwarzbauer C, Schroeter ML et al. Investigating brain response to music: A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes. Neuroimage. 2011 Jan 1;54(1):337-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.029
Mueller, Karsten ; Mildner, Toralf ; Fritz, Thomas ; Lepsien, Joeran ; Schwarzbauer, Christian ; Schroeter, Matthias L. ; Moeller, Harald E. / Investigating brain response to music : A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes. In: Neuroimage. 2011 ; Vol. 54, No. 1. pp. 337-343.
@article{e7bc614b2e304671a32465df12fa5b3e,
title = "Investigating brain response to music: A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes",
abstract = "Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in auditory experiments is a challenge, because the scanning procedure produces considerable noise that can interfere with the auditory paradigm. The noise might either mask the auditory material presented, or interfere with stimuli designed to evoke emotions because it sounds loud and rather unpleasant. Therefore, scanning paradigms that allow interleaved auditory stimulation and image acquisition appear to be advantageous. The sparse temporal sampling (STS) technique uses a very long repetition time in order to achieve a stimulus presentation in the absence of scanner noise. Although only relatively few volumes are acquired for the resulting data sets, there have been recent studies where this method has furthered remarkable results. A new development is the interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) technique. Compared with STS, this method is capable of acquiring several volumes in the time frame between the auditory trials (while the magnetization is kept in a steady state during stimulus presentation).In order to draw conclusions about the optimum fMRI procedure with auditory stimulation, different echo-planar imaging (EPI) acquisition schemes were compared: Continuous scanning, STS, and ISSS. The total acquisition time of each sequence was adjusted to about 12.5 min. The results indicate that the ISSS approach exhibits the highest sensitivity in detecting subtle activity in sub-cortical brain regions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Scanner background-noise, event-related FMRI, auditory-cortex, functional MRI, acoustic noise, bold response, emotion, time, hippocampus, inference",
author = "Karsten Mueller and Toralf Mildner and Thomas Fritz and Joeran Lepsien and Christian Schwarzbauer and Schroeter, {Matthias L.} and Moeller, {Harald E.}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.029",
language = "English",
volume = "54",
pages = "337--343",
journal = "Neuroimage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating brain response to music

T2 - A comparison of different fMRI acquisition schemes

AU - Mueller, Karsten

AU - Mildner, Toralf

AU - Fritz, Thomas

AU - Lepsien, Joeran

AU - Schwarzbauer, Christian

AU - Schroeter, Matthias L.

AU - Moeller, Harald E.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in auditory experiments is a challenge, because the scanning procedure produces considerable noise that can interfere with the auditory paradigm. The noise might either mask the auditory material presented, or interfere with stimuli designed to evoke emotions because it sounds loud and rather unpleasant. Therefore, scanning paradigms that allow interleaved auditory stimulation and image acquisition appear to be advantageous. The sparse temporal sampling (STS) technique uses a very long repetition time in order to achieve a stimulus presentation in the absence of scanner noise. Although only relatively few volumes are acquired for the resulting data sets, there have been recent studies where this method has furthered remarkable results. A new development is the interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) technique. Compared with STS, this method is capable of acquiring several volumes in the time frame between the auditory trials (while the magnetization is kept in a steady state during stimulus presentation).In order to draw conclusions about the optimum fMRI procedure with auditory stimulation, different echo-planar imaging (EPI) acquisition schemes were compared: Continuous scanning, STS, and ISSS. The total acquisition time of each sequence was adjusted to about 12.5 min. The results indicate that the ISSS approach exhibits the highest sensitivity in detecting subtle activity in sub-cortical brain regions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

AB - Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in auditory experiments is a challenge, because the scanning procedure produces considerable noise that can interfere with the auditory paradigm. The noise might either mask the auditory material presented, or interfere with stimuli designed to evoke emotions because it sounds loud and rather unpleasant. Therefore, scanning paradigms that allow interleaved auditory stimulation and image acquisition appear to be advantageous. The sparse temporal sampling (STS) technique uses a very long repetition time in order to achieve a stimulus presentation in the absence of scanner noise. Although only relatively few volumes are acquired for the resulting data sets, there have been recent studies where this method has furthered remarkable results. A new development is the interleaved silent steady state (ISSS) technique. Compared with STS, this method is capable of acquiring several volumes in the time frame between the auditory trials (while the magnetization is kept in a steady state during stimulus presentation).In order to draw conclusions about the optimum fMRI procedure with auditory stimulation, different echo-planar imaging (EPI) acquisition schemes were compared: Continuous scanning, STS, and ISSS. The total acquisition time of each sequence was adjusted to about 12.5 min. The results indicate that the ISSS approach exhibits the highest sensitivity in detecting subtle activity in sub-cortical brain regions. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

KW - Scanner background-noise

KW - event-related FMRI

KW - auditory-cortex

KW - functional MRI

KW - acoustic noise

KW - bold response

KW - emotion

KW - time

KW - hippocampus

KW - inference

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.029

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.029

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 337

EP - 343

JO - Neuroimage

JF - Neuroimage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 1

ER -