Investigation into Human Preference between Common and Unambiguous Lexical Substitutions

Andrew Walker; Advaith Siddharthan; Andrew Starkey

Investigation into Human Preference between Common and Unambiguous Lexical Substitutions

Andrew Walker, Advaith Siddharthan, Andrew Starkey

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

Abstract

We present a study that investigates the fac tors that determine what makes a good lexi cal substitution. We begin by observing that there is a correlation between the corpus fre quency of words and the number of WordNet senses they have, and hypothesise that readers might prefer common, but ambiguous terms over less ambiguous but less common words. In this paper we identify four properties of a word that determine whether it is a suit able substitution in a given context, and ask volunteers to rank their preferences between two common but ambiguous lexical substi tutions, and two uncommon but also unambiguous ones. Preliminary results suggest a slight preference towards the unambiguous.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation
Number of pages	5
Publication status	Published - Sep 2011
Event	13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation - Nancy, France Duration: 28 Sep 2011 → 30 Sep 2011

Conference

Conference	13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation
Country	France
City	Nancy
Period	28/09/11 → 30/09/11

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Investigation into Human Preference between Common and Unambiguous Lexical Substitutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@inproceedings{e63471b6e33d4a8890b3666ca6fce842,

title = "Investigation into Human Preference between Common and Unambiguous Lexical Substitutions",

abstract = "We present a study that investigates the fac tors that determine what makes a good lexi cal substitution. We begin by observing that there is a correlation between the corpus fre quency of words and the number of WordNet senses they have, and hypothesise that readers might prefer common, but ambiguous terms over less ambiguous but less common words. In this paper we identify four properties of a word that determine whether it is a suit able substitution in a given context, and ask volunteers to rank their preferences between two common but ambiguous lexical substi tutions, and two uncommon but also unambiguous ones. Preliminary results suggest a slight preference towards the unambiguous.",

author = "Andrew Walker and Advaith Siddharthan and Andrew Starkey",

year = "2011",

month = sep,

language = "English",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation",

note = "13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation ; Conference date: 28-09-2011 Through 30-09-2011",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Investigation into Human Preference between Common and Unambiguous Lexical Substitutions

AU - Walker, Andrew

AU - Siddharthan, Advaith

AU - Starkey, Andrew

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - We present a study that investigates the fac tors that determine what makes a good lexi cal substitution. We begin by observing that there is a correlation between the corpus fre quency of words and the number of WordNet senses they have, and hypothesise that readers might prefer common, but ambiguous terms over less ambiguous but less common words. In this paper we identify four properties of a word that determine whether it is a suit able substitution in a given context, and ask volunteers to rank their preferences between two common but ambiguous lexical substi tutions, and two uncommon but also unambiguous ones. Preliminary results suggest a slight preference towards the unambiguous.

AB - We present a study that investigates the fac tors that determine what makes a good lexi cal substitution. We begin by observing that there is a correlation between the corpus fre quency of words and the number of WordNet senses they have, and hypothesise that readers might prefer common, but ambiguous terms over less ambiguous but less common words. In this paper we identify four properties of a word that determine whether it is a suit able substitution in a given context, and ask volunteers to rank their preferences between two common but ambiguous lexical substi tutions, and two uncommon but also unambiguous ones. Preliminary results suggest a slight preference towards the unambiguous.

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Proceedings of the 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation

T2 - 13th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation

Y2 - 28 September 2011 through 30 September 2011

ER -