Invisibility & Interpretation

Michael H Herzog, Frouke Hermens, Haluk Ogmen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.
Original languageEnglish
Article number975
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume5
Early online date17 Sep 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Masks

Keywords

  • masking
  • priming
  • visibility
  • consciousness

Cite this

Herzog, M. H., Hermens, F., & Ogmen, H. (2014). Invisibility & Interpretation. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, [975]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975

Invisibility & Interpretation. / Herzog, Michael H; Hermens, Frouke; Ogmen, Haluk.

In: Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5, 975, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herzog, Michael H ; Hermens, Frouke ; Ogmen, Haluk. / Invisibility & Interpretation. In: Frontiers in Psychology. 2014 ; Vol. 5.
@article{54f12e4449d9499aa32dfe3f473504be,
title = "Invisibility & Interpretation",
abstract = "Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.",
keywords = "masking, priming, visibility, consciousness",
author = "Herzog, {Michael H} and Frouke Hermens and Haluk Ogmen",
note = "Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) project “Basics of visual processing: from retinotopic encoding to non-retinotopic representations.”",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychology",
issn = "1664-1078",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Invisibility & Interpretation

AU - Herzog, Michael H

AU - Hermens, Frouke

AU - Ogmen, Haluk

N1 - Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) project “Basics of visual processing: from retinotopic encoding to non-retinotopic representations.”

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.

AB - Invisibility is often thought to occur because of the low-level limitations of the visual system. For example, it is often assumed that backward masking renders a target invisible because the visual system is simply too slow to resolve the target and the mask separately. Here, we propose an alternative explanation in which invisibility is a goal rather than a limitation and occurs naturally when making sense out of the plethora of incoming information. For example, we present evidence that (in)visibility of an element can strongly depend on how it groups with other elements. Changing grouping changes visibility. In addition, we will show that features often just appear to be invisible but are in fact visible in a way the experimenter is not aware of.

KW - masking

KW - priming

KW - visibility

KW - consciousness

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975

DO - 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00975

M3 - Article

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Psychology

JF - Frontiers in Psychology

SN - 1664-1078

M1 - 975

ER -