Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation

Vikki Entwistle, Maria Prior, Zoe C. Skea, Jillian J. Francis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

60 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Patient involvement in decision-making is widely regarded as an important feature of good-quality healthcare. Policymakers have been particularly concerned to ensure that patients are informed about and enabled to choose between relevant treatment options, but it is not clear how patients understand and value involvement.
We investigated the meaning of involvement in treatment decision-making for people with diabetes. We conducted semistructured interviews with 18 people aged between 20 and 79 who had type I or type 2 diabetes selected from 4 multipractitioner outpatient clinics in the Grampian area of Scotland. We used several strategies to probe their understandings of involvement, including a discussion of how they would respond to a question about involvement in treatment decisions that appears on the National Patient Survey used to monitor the quality of healthcare in England.
Participants associated involvement in decision-making with a number of features relating to the ethos and feel of healthcare encounters (welcoming; respectful; facilitative of patients' contributions; and non-judgemental); communication about health problems (practitioners attending to patients' views and patients feeling listened to; practitioners giving clear explanations based on their professional knowledge and patients understanding these); and communication about treatments (practitioners explaining treatment rationales in ways that patients understand and enabling patients to feel they have a say).
Our findings have implications for practical attempts to involve patients in decisions about their care and for the conceptualisation and assessment of patient involvement. They suggest that practitioners who aspire to facilitate patient involvement should attend to the ethos they foster in consultations and the way they discuss problems as well as to the provision of information about treatment options and the scope patients have to influence decisions. Models and taxonomies of patient involvement in decision-making need to be developed to accommodate both problem-solving phases and the relational and subjective dimensions of involvement. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)362-375
Number of pages14
JournalSocial Science & Medicine
Volume66
Issue number2
Early online date22 Oct 2007
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2008

Fingerprint

chronic illness
Decision Making
decision making
Patient Participation
Therapeutics
Quality of Health Care
Diabetes
Conceptualization
outpatient clinic
Health Communication
communication
Scotland
taxonomy
Ambulatory Care Facilities
England
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Emotions
Referral and Consultation
Communication
Interviews

Keywords

  • Scotland
  • diabetes
  • patient involvement
  • decision-making
  • patient-professional relations
  • UK
  • patient involvment
  • health-care
  • cancer
  • participation
  • consultations
  • preferences
  • clinician
  • autonomy
  • fit

Cite this

Involvement in treatment decision-making : its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation. / Entwistle, Vikki; Prior, Maria; Skea, Zoe C.; Francis, Jillian J.

In: Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 66, No. 2, 01.2008, p. 362-375.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d044db9f3238484ba71b347effbe08da,
title = "Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation",
abstract = "Patient involvement in decision-making is widely regarded as an important feature of good-quality healthcare. Policymakers have been particularly concerned to ensure that patients are informed about and enabled to choose between relevant treatment options, but it is not clear how patients understand and value involvement. We investigated the meaning of involvement in treatment decision-making for people with diabetes. We conducted semistructured interviews with 18 people aged between 20 and 79 who had type I or type 2 diabetes selected from 4 multipractitioner outpatient clinics in the Grampian area of Scotland. We used several strategies to probe their understandings of involvement, including a discussion of how they would respond to a question about involvement in treatment decisions that appears on the National Patient Survey used to monitor the quality of healthcare in England. Participants associated involvement in decision-making with a number of features relating to the ethos and feel of healthcare encounters (welcoming; respectful; facilitative of patients' contributions; and non-judgemental); communication about health problems (practitioners attending to patients' views and patients feeling listened to; practitioners giving clear explanations based on their professional knowledge and patients understanding these); and communication about treatments (practitioners explaining treatment rationales in ways that patients understand and enabling patients to feel they have a say). Our findings have implications for practical attempts to involve patients in decisions about their care and for the conceptualisation and assessment of patient involvement. They suggest that practitioners who aspire to facilitate patient involvement should attend to the ethos they foster in consultations and the way they discuss problems as well as to the provision of information about treatment options and the scope patients have to influence decisions. Models and taxonomies of patient involvement in decision-making need to be developed to accommodate both problem-solving phases and the relational and subjective dimensions of involvement. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Scotland, diabetes, patient involvement, decision-making, patient-professional relations, UK, patient involvment, health-care, cancer, participation, consultations, preferences, clinician, autonomy, fit",
author = "Vikki Entwistle and Maria Prior and Skea, {Zoe C.} and Francis, {Jillian J.}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "362--375",
journal = "Social Science & Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Involvement in treatment decision-making

T2 - its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation

AU - Entwistle, Vikki

AU - Prior, Maria

AU - Skea, Zoe C.

AU - Francis, Jillian J.

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Patient involvement in decision-making is widely regarded as an important feature of good-quality healthcare. Policymakers have been particularly concerned to ensure that patients are informed about and enabled to choose between relevant treatment options, but it is not clear how patients understand and value involvement. We investigated the meaning of involvement in treatment decision-making for people with diabetes. We conducted semistructured interviews with 18 people aged between 20 and 79 who had type I or type 2 diabetes selected from 4 multipractitioner outpatient clinics in the Grampian area of Scotland. We used several strategies to probe their understandings of involvement, including a discussion of how they would respond to a question about involvement in treatment decisions that appears on the National Patient Survey used to monitor the quality of healthcare in England. Participants associated involvement in decision-making with a number of features relating to the ethos and feel of healthcare encounters (welcoming; respectful; facilitative of patients' contributions; and non-judgemental); communication about health problems (practitioners attending to patients' views and patients feeling listened to; practitioners giving clear explanations based on their professional knowledge and patients understanding these); and communication about treatments (practitioners explaining treatment rationales in ways that patients understand and enabling patients to feel they have a say). Our findings have implications for practical attempts to involve patients in decisions about their care and for the conceptualisation and assessment of patient involvement. They suggest that practitioners who aspire to facilitate patient involvement should attend to the ethos they foster in consultations and the way they discuss problems as well as to the provision of information about treatment options and the scope patients have to influence decisions. Models and taxonomies of patient involvement in decision-making need to be developed to accommodate both problem-solving phases and the relational and subjective dimensions of involvement. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - Patient involvement in decision-making is widely regarded as an important feature of good-quality healthcare. Policymakers have been particularly concerned to ensure that patients are informed about and enabled to choose between relevant treatment options, but it is not clear how patients understand and value involvement. We investigated the meaning of involvement in treatment decision-making for people with diabetes. We conducted semistructured interviews with 18 people aged between 20 and 79 who had type I or type 2 diabetes selected from 4 multipractitioner outpatient clinics in the Grampian area of Scotland. We used several strategies to probe their understandings of involvement, including a discussion of how they would respond to a question about involvement in treatment decisions that appears on the National Patient Survey used to monitor the quality of healthcare in England. Participants associated involvement in decision-making with a number of features relating to the ethos and feel of healthcare encounters (welcoming; respectful; facilitative of patients' contributions; and non-judgemental); communication about health problems (practitioners attending to patients' views and patients feeling listened to; practitioners giving clear explanations based on their professional knowledge and patients understanding these); and communication about treatments (practitioners explaining treatment rationales in ways that patients understand and enabling patients to feel they have a say). Our findings have implications for practical attempts to involve patients in decisions about their care and for the conceptualisation and assessment of patient involvement. They suggest that practitioners who aspire to facilitate patient involvement should attend to the ethos they foster in consultations and the way they discuss problems as well as to the provision of information about treatment options and the scope patients have to influence decisions. Models and taxonomies of patient involvement in decision-making need to be developed to accommodate both problem-solving phases and the relational and subjective dimensions of involvement. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

KW - Scotland

KW - diabetes

KW - patient involvement

KW - decision-making

KW - patient-professional relations

KW - UK

KW - patient involvment

KW - health-care

KW - cancer

KW - participation

KW - consultations

KW - preferences

KW - clinician

KW - autonomy

KW - fit

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 362

EP - 375

JO - Social Science & Medicine

JF - Social Science & Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 2

ER -