Involving the public in NHS service planning

criteria and methods for evaluating NHS Boards' Activity

Silvia Anton, Lorna McKee, Stephen Harrison, Shelley Farrar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a study that examined the development of an assessment framework for public involvement.

Design/methodology/approach
– The paper has adopted a multi‐method approach that includes: a focused review of literature relating to tools that might be used to provide valid and reliable assessments of public involvement; key informant interviews with people with experience from various perspectives of efforts to involve the public in the planning and development of health services; and a detailed study of a specific public involvement initiative involving a range of “stakeholder” interviews.

Findings
– The paper finds that there are uncertainty and a lack of consensus about how assessment of public involvement should be undertaken. The findings emphasise the need to recognise the diverse nature of public involvement, which may require assessment to be employed flexibly at each individual NHS Board level.

Research limitations/implications
– The paper is a small‐scale study, in which it was only possible to probe a limited number of stakeholders' views due to practical and time restrictions.

Originality/value
– The paper adds value to the discussions taking place at Scottish Government level as to the best approach in assessing public involvement in health service decision making.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)470-483
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Health Organization & Management
Volume21
Issue number4/5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

Health Services
Interviews
Uncertainty
Consensus
Decision Making
Research
Public involvement
Planning
Stakeholders
Health services

Cite this

Involving the public in NHS service planning : criteria and methods for evaluating NHS Boards' Activity. / Anton, Silvia; McKee, Lorna; Harrison, Stephen; Farrar, Shelley.

In: Journal of Health Organization & Management, Vol. 21, No. 4/5, 2007, p. 470-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f46a8db7f05e4421bb77d0fe9a669c42,
title = "Involving the public in NHS service planning: criteria and methods for evaluating NHS Boards' Activity",
abstract = "Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a study that examined the development of an assessment framework for public involvement.Design/methodology/approach– The paper has adopted a multi‐method approach that includes: a focused review of literature relating to tools that might be used to provide valid and reliable assessments of public involvement; key informant interviews with people with experience from various perspectives of efforts to involve the public in the planning and development of health services; and a detailed study of a specific public involvement initiative involving a range of “stakeholder” interviews.Findings– The paper finds that there are uncertainty and a lack of consensus about how assessment of public involvement should be undertaken. The findings emphasise the need to recognise the diverse nature of public involvement, which may require assessment to be employed flexibly at each individual NHS Board level.Research limitations/implications– The paper is a small‐scale study, in which it was only possible to probe a limited number of stakeholders' views due to practical and time restrictions.Originality/value– The paper adds value to the discussions taking place at Scottish Government level as to the best approach in assessing public involvement in health service decision making.",
author = "Silvia Anton and Lorna McKee and Stephen Harrison and Shelley Farrar",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1108/14777260710778989",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "470--483",
journal = "Journal of Health Organization & Management",
issn = "1477-7266",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4/5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Involving the public in NHS service planning

T2 - criteria and methods for evaluating NHS Boards' Activity

AU - Anton, Silvia

AU - McKee, Lorna

AU - Harrison, Stephen

AU - Farrar, Shelley

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a study that examined the development of an assessment framework for public involvement.Design/methodology/approach– The paper has adopted a multi‐method approach that includes: a focused review of literature relating to tools that might be used to provide valid and reliable assessments of public involvement; key informant interviews with people with experience from various perspectives of efforts to involve the public in the planning and development of health services; and a detailed study of a specific public involvement initiative involving a range of “stakeholder” interviews.Findings– The paper finds that there are uncertainty and a lack of consensus about how assessment of public involvement should be undertaken. The findings emphasise the need to recognise the diverse nature of public involvement, which may require assessment to be employed flexibly at each individual NHS Board level.Research limitations/implications– The paper is a small‐scale study, in which it was only possible to probe a limited number of stakeholders' views due to practical and time restrictions.Originality/value– The paper adds value to the discussions taking place at Scottish Government level as to the best approach in assessing public involvement in health service decision making.

AB - Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to report the findings of a study that examined the development of an assessment framework for public involvement.Design/methodology/approach– The paper has adopted a multi‐method approach that includes: a focused review of literature relating to tools that might be used to provide valid and reliable assessments of public involvement; key informant interviews with people with experience from various perspectives of efforts to involve the public in the planning and development of health services; and a detailed study of a specific public involvement initiative involving a range of “stakeholder” interviews.Findings– The paper finds that there are uncertainty and a lack of consensus about how assessment of public involvement should be undertaken. The findings emphasise the need to recognise the diverse nature of public involvement, which may require assessment to be employed flexibly at each individual NHS Board level.Research limitations/implications– The paper is a small‐scale study, in which it was only possible to probe a limited number of stakeholders' views due to practical and time restrictions.Originality/value– The paper adds value to the discussions taking place at Scottish Government level as to the best approach in assessing public involvement in health service decision making.

U2 - 10.1108/14777260710778989

DO - 10.1108/14777260710778989

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 470

EP - 483

JO - Journal of Health Organization & Management

JF - Journal of Health Organization & Management

SN - 1477-7266

IS - 4/5

ER -