Is Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction Superior to Conservative Treatment?

A. G. Dawson, J. D. Hutchison, A. G. Sutherland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Not all patients who have a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) elect to have surgical reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the short-to-medium-term results of patients who chose conservative management in comparison to patients who had reconstructive surgery within the same time period. Sixty-three patients with an ACL injury were retrospectively studied. Forty patients were managed, according to patient choice, with ACL reconstruction and 23 conservatively. Four validated questionnaires were used to assess general and knee-specific function in a cohort with a median age of 32 years and a median follow-up period of 38 months. Patients were matched on demographic variables except for gender. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures, and the majority of patients would proceed with the same treatment in the event the control leg became injured. Patients who elect to have conservative management of an ACL rupture can achieve similar function and satisfaction to those who elect to have reconstruction. Until a large randomized controlled trial is conducted, patients need to be made aware of the merits of both management strategies and the lack of evidence of superiority of one over the other.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)74-79
Number of pages6
JournalThe journal of knee surgery
Volume29
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Rupture
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Conservative Treatment
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Leg
Knee
Randomized Controlled Trials
Demography
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Therapeutics
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • anterior cruciate ligament
  • management
  • operative
  • conservative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Is Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction Superior to Conservative Treatment? / Dawson, A. G.; Hutchison, J. D.; Sutherland, A. G.

In: The journal of knee surgery, Vol. 29, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 74-79.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dawson, A. G. ; Hutchison, J. D. ; Sutherland, A. G. / Is Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction Superior to Conservative Treatment?. In: The journal of knee surgery. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 1. pp. 74-79.
@article{6217009fe0bf43e1b9566e3ba28ebf7b,
title = "Is Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction Superior to Conservative Treatment?",
abstract = "Not all patients who have a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) elect to have surgical reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the short-to-medium-term results of patients who chose conservative management in comparison to patients who had reconstructive surgery within the same time period. Sixty-three patients with an ACL injury were retrospectively studied. Forty patients were managed, according to patient choice, with ACL reconstruction and 23 conservatively. Four validated questionnaires were used to assess general and knee-specific function in a cohort with a median age of 32 years and a median follow-up period of 38 months. Patients were matched on demographic variables except for gender. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures, and the majority of patients would proceed with the same treatment in the event the control leg became injured. Patients who elect to have conservative management of an ACL rupture can achieve similar function and satisfaction to those who elect to have reconstruction. Until a large randomized controlled trial is conducted, patients need to be made aware of the merits of both management strategies and the lack of evidence of superiority of one over the other.",
keywords = "anterior cruciate ligament, management, operative, conservative",
author = "Dawson, {A. G.} and Hutchison, {J. D.} and Sutherland, {A. G.}",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0034-1396017",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "74--79",
journal = "The journal of knee surgery",
issn = "1938-2480",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Anterior Cruciate Reconstruction Superior to Conservative Treatment?

AU - Dawson, A. G.

AU - Hutchison, J. D.

AU - Sutherland, A. G.

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Not all patients who have a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) elect to have surgical reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the short-to-medium-term results of patients who chose conservative management in comparison to patients who had reconstructive surgery within the same time period. Sixty-three patients with an ACL injury were retrospectively studied. Forty patients were managed, according to patient choice, with ACL reconstruction and 23 conservatively. Four validated questionnaires were used to assess general and knee-specific function in a cohort with a median age of 32 years and a median follow-up period of 38 months. Patients were matched on demographic variables except for gender. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures, and the majority of patients would proceed with the same treatment in the event the control leg became injured. Patients who elect to have conservative management of an ACL rupture can achieve similar function and satisfaction to those who elect to have reconstruction. Until a large randomized controlled trial is conducted, patients need to be made aware of the merits of both management strategies and the lack of evidence of superiority of one over the other.

AB - Not all patients who have a rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) elect to have surgical reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess the short-to-medium-term results of patients who chose conservative management in comparison to patients who had reconstructive surgery within the same time period. Sixty-three patients with an ACL injury were retrospectively studied. Forty patients were managed, according to patient choice, with ACL reconstruction and 23 conservatively. Four validated questionnaires were used to assess general and knee-specific function in a cohort with a median age of 32 years and a median follow-up period of 38 months. Patients were matched on demographic variables except for gender. There were no statistically significant differences in the outcome measures, and the majority of patients would proceed with the same treatment in the event the control leg became injured. Patients who elect to have conservative management of an ACL rupture can achieve similar function and satisfaction to those who elect to have reconstruction. Until a large randomized controlled trial is conducted, patients need to be made aware of the merits of both management strategies and the lack of evidence of superiority of one over the other.

KW - anterior cruciate ligament

KW - management

KW - operative

KW - conservative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987680027&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0034-1396017

DO - 10.1055/s-0034-1396017

M3 - Article

C2 - 25438034

AN - SCOPUS:84987680027

VL - 29

SP - 74

EP - 79

JO - The journal of knee surgery

JF - The journal of knee surgery

SN - 1938-2480

IS - 1

ER -