Is bigger necessarily better for environmental research?

Rene van der Wal, Anke Fischer, Mick Marquiss, Steve Redpath, Sarah Wanless

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In restructuring environmental research organisations, smaller sites generally disappear and larger sites are created. These decisions are based on the economic principle, 'economies of scale', whereby the average cost of each unit produced falls as output increases. We show that this principle does not apply to the scientific performance of environmental research institutes, as productivity per scientist decreased with increasing size of a research site. The results are best explained by the principle 'diseconomies of scale', whereby powerful social factors limit the productivity of larger groupings. These findings should be considered when restructuring environmental science organisations to maximise their quality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-322
Number of pages6
JournalScientometrics
Volume78
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

Keywords

  • planned behavior
  • reasoned action
  • scale
  • economics
  • law

Cite this

Is bigger necessarily better for environmental research? / van der Wal, Rene; Fischer, Anke; Marquiss, Mick; Redpath, Steve; Wanless, Sarah.

In: Scientometrics, Vol. 78, No. 2, 02.2009, p. 317-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5f69c51de1724856bfe1608b0aa5497e,
title = "Is bigger necessarily better for environmental research?",
abstract = "In restructuring environmental research organisations, smaller sites generally disappear and larger sites are created. These decisions are based on the economic principle, 'economies of scale', whereby the average cost of each unit produced falls as output increases. We show that this principle does not apply to the scientific performance of environmental research institutes, as productivity per scientist decreased with increasing size of a research site. The results are best explained by the principle 'diseconomies of scale', whereby powerful social factors limit the productivity of larger groupings. These findings should be considered when restructuring environmental science organisations to maximise their quality.",
keywords = "planned behavior, reasoned action, scale, economics, law",
author = "{van der Wal}, Rene and Anke Fischer and Mick Marquiss and Steve Redpath and Sarah Wanless",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-007-2017-0",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "317--322",
journal = "Scientometrics",
issn = "0138-9130",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is bigger necessarily better for environmental research?

AU - van der Wal, Rene

AU - Fischer, Anke

AU - Marquiss, Mick

AU - Redpath, Steve

AU - Wanless, Sarah

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - In restructuring environmental research organisations, smaller sites generally disappear and larger sites are created. These decisions are based on the economic principle, 'economies of scale', whereby the average cost of each unit produced falls as output increases. We show that this principle does not apply to the scientific performance of environmental research institutes, as productivity per scientist decreased with increasing size of a research site. The results are best explained by the principle 'diseconomies of scale', whereby powerful social factors limit the productivity of larger groupings. These findings should be considered when restructuring environmental science organisations to maximise their quality.

AB - In restructuring environmental research organisations, smaller sites generally disappear and larger sites are created. These decisions are based on the economic principle, 'economies of scale', whereby the average cost of each unit produced falls as output increases. We show that this principle does not apply to the scientific performance of environmental research institutes, as productivity per scientist decreased with increasing size of a research site. The results are best explained by the principle 'diseconomies of scale', whereby powerful social factors limit the productivity of larger groupings. These findings should be considered when restructuring environmental science organisations to maximise their quality.

KW - planned behavior

KW - reasoned action

KW - scale

KW - economics

KW - law

U2 - 10.1007/s11192-007-2017-0

DO - 10.1007/s11192-007-2017-0

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 317

EP - 322

JO - Scientometrics

JF - Scientometrics

SN - 0138-9130

IS - 2

ER -