Is it really search or just matching? The influence of Goodness, number of stimuli and presentation sequence in same-different tasks

Frouke Hermens, Thomas Lachmann, Cees van Leeuwen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Goodness of Garner dot patterns has been shown to influence same–different response times in a specific way, which has led to the formulation of a memory search model of pattern comparison. In this model, the space of possible variations of each pattern is searched separately for each pattern in the comparison, resulting in faster response times for patterns that have fewer alternatives. Compared to an alternative explanation based on stimulus encoding plus mental rotation, however, the existing data strongly favor this explanation. To obtain a more constraining set of data to distinguish between the two possible accounts, we extended the original paradigm to a situation in which participants needed to compare three, rather than two patterns and varied the way the stimuli were presented (simultaneously or sequentially). Our findings suggest that neither the memory search nor the encoding plus mental rotation model provides a complete description of the data, and that the effects of Goodness must be understood in a combination of both mechanisms, or in terms of cascades processing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-63
Number of pages22
JournalPsychological Research
Volume79
Issue number1
Early online date15 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Reaction Time
Goodness
Stimulus
Datasets
Encoding
Mental Rotation
Response Time

Keywords

  • Goodness of Garner dot patterns
  • stimuli
  • same - different tasks

Cite this

Is it really search or just matching? The influence of Goodness, number of stimuli and presentation sequence in same-different tasks. / Hermens, Frouke; Lachmann, Thomas; van Leeuwen, Cees.

In: Psychological Research, Vol. 79, No. 1, 01.2015, p. 42-63.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9402160ce1e94e0dbaa180122b6dc526,
title = "Is it really search or just matching?: The influence of Goodness, number of stimuli and presentation sequence in same-different tasks",
abstract = "The Goodness of Garner dot patterns has been shown to influence same–different response times in a specific way, which has led to the formulation of a memory search model of pattern comparison. In this model, the space of possible variations of each pattern is searched separately for each pattern in the comparison, resulting in faster response times for patterns that have fewer alternatives. Compared to an alternative explanation based on stimulus encoding plus mental rotation, however, the existing data strongly favor this explanation. To obtain a more constraining set of data to distinguish between the two possible accounts, we extended the original paradigm to a situation in which participants needed to compare three, rather than two patterns and varied the way the stimuli were presented (simultaneously or sequentially). Our findings suggest that neither the memory search nor the encoding plus mental rotation model provides a complete description of the data, and that the effects of Goodness must be understood in a combination of both mechanisms, or in terms of cascades processing.",
keywords = "Goodness of Garner dot patterns, stimuli, same - different tasks",
author = "Frouke Hermens and Thomas Lachmann and {van Leeuwen}, Cees",
note = "Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank all the students involved in data collection and participating.",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00426-013-0529-1",
language = "English",
volume = "79",
pages = "42--63",
journal = "Psychological Research",
issn = "0340-0727",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it really search or just matching?

T2 - The influence of Goodness, number of stimuli and presentation sequence in same-different tasks

AU - Hermens, Frouke

AU - Lachmann, Thomas

AU - van Leeuwen, Cees

N1 - Acknowledgements: The authors wish to thank all the students involved in data collection and participating.

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - The Goodness of Garner dot patterns has been shown to influence same–different response times in a specific way, which has led to the formulation of a memory search model of pattern comparison. In this model, the space of possible variations of each pattern is searched separately for each pattern in the comparison, resulting in faster response times for patterns that have fewer alternatives. Compared to an alternative explanation based on stimulus encoding plus mental rotation, however, the existing data strongly favor this explanation. To obtain a more constraining set of data to distinguish between the two possible accounts, we extended the original paradigm to a situation in which participants needed to compare three, rather than two patterns and varied the way the stimuli were presented (simultaneously or sequentially). Our findings suggest that neither the memory search nor the encoding plus mental rotation model provides a complete description of the data, and that the effects of Goodness must be understood in a combination of both mechanisms, or in terms of cascades processing.

AB - The Goodness of Garner dot patterns has been shown to influence same–different response times in a specific way, which has led to the formulation of a memory search model of pattern comparison. In this model, the space of possible variations of each pattern is searched separately for each pattern in the comparison, resulting in faster response times for patterns that have fewer alternatives. Compared to an alternative explanation based on stimulus encoding plus mental rotation, however, the existing data strongly favor this explanation. To obtain a more constraining set of data to distinguish between the two possible accounts, we extended the original paradigm to a situation in which participants needed to compare three, rather than two patterns and varied the way the stimuli were presented (simultaneously or sequentially). Our findings suggest that neither the memory search nor the encoding plus mental rotation model provides a complete description of the data, and that the effects of Goodness must be understood in a combination of both mechanisms, or in terms of cascades processing.

KW - Goodness of Garner dot patterns

KW - stimuli

KW - same - different tasks

U2 - 10.1007/s00426-013-0529-1

DO - 10.1007/s00426-013-0529-1

M3 - Article

VL - 79

SP - 42

EP - 63

JO - Psychological Research

JF - Psychological Research

SN - 0340-0727

IS - 1

ER -