Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment

a UK-based qualitative interview study

Joanna C Crocker, Anne-Marie Boylan, Jennifer Bostock, Louise Locock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There are mounting calls for robust, critical evaluation of the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research. However, questions remain about how to assess its impact, and whether it should be assessed at all. The debate has thus far been dominated by professionals.To explore the views of PPI contributors involved in health research regarding the impact of PPI on research, whether and how it should be assessed.Qualitative interview study.Thirty-eight PPI contributors involved in health research across the UK.Participants felt that PPI has a beneficial impact on health research. They described various impactful roles, which we conceptualize as the 'expert in lived experience', the 'creative outsider', the 'free challenger', the 'bridger', the 'motivator' and the 'passive presence'. Participants generally supported assessing the impact of PPI, while acknowledging the challenges and concerns about the appropriateness and feasibility of measurement. They expressed a range of views about what impacts should be assessed, by whom and how. Individual feedback on impact was seen as an important driver of improved impact and motivation to stay involved.While there appears to be widespread support for PPI impact assessment among PPI contributors, their views on what to assess and how are diverse. PPI contributors should be involved as equal partners in debates and decisions about these issues. Individual feedback on impact may increase PPI contributors' potential impact and their motivation to stay involved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)519-528
Number of pages10
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume20
Issue number3
Early online date24 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Interviews
Health
Research

Keywords

  • evaluation
  • impact
  • patient involvement
  • public involvement
  • user involvement

Cite this

Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment : a UK-based qualitative interview study. / Crocker, Joanna C; Boylan, Anne-Marie; Bostock, Jennifer; Locock, Louise.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 20, No. 3, 06.2017, p. 519-528.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{10aedd8a8f5b423aa07544abf742c6ea,
title = "Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study",
abstract = "There are mounting calls for robust, critical evaluation of the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research. However, questions remain about how to assess its impact, and whether it should be assessed at all. The debate has thus far been dominated by professionals.To explore the views of PPI contributors involved in health research regarding the impact of PPI on research, whether and how it should be assessed.Qualitative interview study.Thirty-eight PPI contributors involved in health research across the UK.Participants felt that PPI has a beneficial impact on health research. They described various impactful roles, which we conceptualize as the 'expert in lived experience', the 'creative outsider', the 'free challenger', the 'bridger', the 'motivator' and the 'passive presence'. Participants generally supported assessing the impact of PPI, while acknowledging the challenges and concerns about the appropriateness and feasibility of measurement. They expressed a range of views about what impacts should be assessed, by whom and how. Individual feedback on impact was seen as an important driver of improved impact and motivation to stay involved.While there appears to be widespread support for PPI impact assessment among PPI contributors, their views on what to assess and how are diverse. PPI contributors should be involved as equal partners in debates and decisions about these issues. Individual feedback on impact may increase PPI contributors' potential impact and their motivation to stay involved.",
keywords = "evaluation, impact, patient involvement, public involvement, user involvement",
author = "Crocker, {Joanna C} and Anne-Marie Boylan and Jennifer Bostock and Louise Locock",
note = "Funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust University of Oxford Applied Health Research and Care Oxford",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/hex.12479",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "519--528",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment

T2 - a UK-based qualitative interview study

AU - Crocker, Joanna C

AU - Boylan, Anne-Marie

AU - Bostock, Jennifer

AU - Locock, Louise

N1 - Funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust University of Oxford Applied Health Research and Care Oxford

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - There are mounting calls for robust, critical evaluation of the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research. However, questions remain about how to assess its impact, and whether it should be assessed at all. The debate has thus far been dominated by professionals.To explore the views of PPI contributors involved in health research regarding the impact of PPI on research, whether and how it should be assessed.Qualitative interview study.Thirty-eight PPI contributors involved in health research across the UK.Participants felt that PPI has a beneficial impact on health research. They described various impactful roles, which we conceptualize as the 'expert in lived experience', the 'creative outsider', the 'free challenger', the 'bridger', the 'motivator' and the 'passive presence'. Participants generally supported assessing the impact of PPI, while acknowledging the challenges and concerns about the appropriateness and feasibility of measurement. They expressed a range of views about what impacts should be assessed, by whom and how. Individual feedback on impact was seen as an important driver of improved impact and motivation to stay involved.While there appears to be widespread support for PPI impact assessment among PPI contributors, their views on what to assess and how are diverse. PPI contributors should be involved as equal partners in debates and decisions about these issues. Individual feedback on impact may increase PPI contributors' potential impact and their motivation to stay involved.

AB - There are mounting calls for robust, critical evaluation of the impact of patient and public involvement (PPI) in health research. However, questions remain about how to assess its impact, and whether it should be assessed at all. The debate has thus far been dominated by professionals.To explore the views of PPI contributors involved in health research regarding the impact of PPI on research, whether and how it should be assessed.Qualitative interview study.Thirty-eight PPI contributors involved in health research across the UK.Participants felt that PPI has a beneficial impact on health research. They described various impactful roles, which we conceptualize as the 'expert in lived experience', the 'creative outsider', the 'free challenger', the 'bridger', the 'motivator' and the 'passive presence'. Participants generally supported assessing the impact of PPI, while acknowledging the challenges and concerns about the appropriateness and feasibility of measurement. They expressed a range of views about what impacts should be assessed, by whom and how. Individual feedback on impact was seen as an important driver of improved impact and motivation to stay involved.While there appears to be widespread support for PPI impact assessment among PPI contributors, their views on what to assess and how are diverse. PPI contributors should be involved as equal partners in debates and decisions about these issues. Individual feedback on impact may increase PPI contributors' potential impact and their motivation to stay involved.

KW - evaluation

KW - impact

KW - patient involvement

KW - public involvement

KW - user involvement

U2 - 10.1111/hex.12479

DO - 10.1111/hex.12479

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 519

EP - 528

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 3

ER -