Is Liver Ultrasound Useful as Part of the Surveillance Strategy following Potentially Curative Colorectal Cancer Resection?

James Schneider* (Corresponding Author), Michalis Koullouros, Craig MacKay, George Ramsay, Craig Parnaby, Lynn Stevenson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Optimal surveillance monitoring following curative resection of colorectal cancer remains unclear. Guidelines recommend computed tomography (CT)-based imaging for the initial 3 years following surgical intervention due to the high rates of local and distant recurrence. However, there is currently limited supporting evidence for this strategy. Our current follow-up practice is to offer annual interval abdominal ultrasound and abdominal/pelvis CT scans starting at 6 and 12 months with the sequence of radiological follow-up remaining at the discretion of each clinician. We aim to establish the additional diagnostic benefit of abdominal ultrasound to CT scans in colorectal cancer surveillance follow-up. Methods: All patients who underwent colorectal resection with curative intent in our region during a single year were included. Patients were detected from a prospectively collected pathology database and supplemented retrospectively with patient demographics, imaging reports, and mortality data. Results: A total of 243 patients (male n = 135, 55.6%) were included. There was a mortality rate of 31.3% over the study period. Patients who received abdominal ultrasound as their initial imaging modality (n = 64, 26.3%) were significantly older, had less severe disease, and a significantly lower mortality rate when compared to CT -patients (n = 148, 60.9%). All patients with new hepatic disease detected by ultrasound scans had their management discussed in multi-disciplinary team meetings before their next scheduled CT. Conclusion: In an era where cross-sectional imaging of colorectal cancer is commonplace, abdominal ultrasound offers additional benefit to CT as a postoperative imaging adjunct for the detection of hepatic disease recurrence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)234-238
Number of pages5
JournalDigestive Diseases
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date22 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Colorectal Neoplasms
Tomography
Liver
Mortality
Recurrence
Pelvis
Demography
Databases
Guidelines
Pathology

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Surveillance monitoring
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Is Liver Ultrasound Useful as Part of the Surveillance Strategy following Potentially Curative Colorectal Cancer Resection? / Schneider, James (Corresponding Author); Koullouros, Michalis; MacKay, Craig; Ramsay, George; Parnaby, Craig; Stevenson, Lynn.

In: Digestive Diseases, Vol. 37, No. 3, 02.2019, p. 234-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schneider, James ; Koullouros, Michalis ; MacKay, Craig ; Ramsay, George ; Parnaby, Craig ; Stevenson, Lynn. / Is Liver Ultrasound Useful as Part of the Surveillance Strategy following Potentially Curative Colorectal Cancer Resection?. In: Digestive Diseases. 2019 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 234-238.
@article{10ac20f6c2b54aa29f27aec288af55ee,
title = "Is Liver Ultrasound Useful as Part of the Surveillance Strategy following Potentially Curative Colorectal Cancer Resection?",
abstract = "Background: Optimal surveillance monitoring following curative resection of colorectal cancer remains unclear. Guidelines recommend computed tomography (CT)-based imaging for the initial 3 years following surgical intervention due to the high rates of local and distant recurrence. However, there is currently limited supporting evidence for this strategy. Our current follow-up practice is to offer annual interval abdominal ultrasound and abdominal/pelvis CT scans starting at 6 and 12 months with the sequence of radiological follow-up remaining at the discretion of each clinician. We aim to establish the additional diagnostic benefit of abdominal ultrasound to CT scans in colorectal cancer surveillance follow-up. Methods: All patients who underwent colorectal resection with curative intent in our region during a single year were included. Patients were detected from a prospectively collected pathology database and supplemented retrospectively with patient demographics, imaging reports, and mortality data. Results: A total of 243 patients (male n = 135, 55.6{\%}) were included. There was a mortality rate of 31.3{\%} over the study period. Patients who received abdominal ultrasound as their initial imaging modality (n = 64, 26.3{\%}) were significantly older, had less severe disease, and a significantly lower mortality rate when compared to CT -patients (n = 148, 60.9{\%}). All patients with new hepatic disease detected by ultrasound scans had their management discussed in multi-disciplinary team meetings before their next scheduled CT. Conclusion: In an era where cross-sectional imaging of colorectal cancer is commonplace, abdominal ultrasound offers additional benefit to CT as a postoperative imaging adjunct for the detection of hepatic disease recurrence.",
keywords = "Colorectal cancer, Surveillance monitoring, Ultrasound",
author = "James Schneider and Michalis Koullouros and Craig MacKay and George Ramsay and Craig Parnaby and Lynn Stevenson",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1159/000495114",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "234--238",
journal = "Journal of Digestive Diseases",
issn = "1751-2972",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Liver Ultrasound Useful as Part of the Surveillance Strategy following Potentially Curative Colorectal Cancer Resection?

AU - Schneider, James

AU - Koullouros, Michalis

AU - MacKay, Craig

AU - Ramsay, George

AU - Parnaby, Craig

AU - Stevenson, Lynn

PY - 2019/2

Y1 - 2019/2

N2 - Background: Optimal surveillance monitoring following curative resection of colorectal cancer remains unclear. Guidelines recommend computed tomography (CT)-based imaging for the initial 3 years following surgical intervention due to the high rates of local and distant recurrence. However, there is currently limited supporting evidence for this strategy. Our current follow-up practice is to offer annual interval abdominal ultrasound and abdominal/pelvis CT scans starting at 6 and 12 months with the sequence of radiological follow-up remaining at the discretion of each clinician. We aim to establish the additional diagnostic benefit of abdominal ultrasound to CT scans in colorectal cancer surveillance follow-up. Methods: All patients who underwent colorectal resection with curative intent in our region during a single year were included. Patients were detected from a prospectively collected pathology database and supplemented retrospectively with patient demographics, imaging reports, and mortality data. Results: A total of 243 patients (male n = 135, 55.6%) were included. There was a mortality rate of 31.3% over the study period. Patients who received abdominal ultrasound as their initial imaging modality (n = 64, 26.3%) were significantly older, had less severe disease, and a significantly lower mortality rate when compared to CT -patients (n = 148, 60.9%). All patients with new hepatic disease detected by ultrasound scans had their management discussed in multi-disciplinary team meetings before their next scheduled CT. Conclusion: In an era where cross-sectional imaging of colorectal cancer is commonplace, abdominal ultrasound offers additional benefit to CT as a postoperative imaging adjunct for the detection of hepatic disease recurrence.

AB - Background: Optimal surveillance monitoring following curative resection of colorectal cancer remains unclear. Guidelines recommend computed tomography (CT)-based imaging for the initial 3 years following surgical intervention due to the high rates of local and distant recurrence. However, there is currently limited supporting evidence for this strategy. Our current follow-up practice is to offer annual interval abdominal ultrasound and abdominal/pelvis CT scans starting at 6 and 12 months with the sequence of radiological follow-up remaining at the discretion of each clinician. We aim to establish the additional diagnostic benefit of abdominal ultrasound to CT scans in colorectal cancer surveillance follow-up. Methods: All patients who underwent colorectal resection with curative intent in our region during a single year were included. Patients were detected from a prospectively collected pathology database and supplemented retrospectively with patient demographics, imaging reports, and mortality data. Results: A total of 243 patients (male n = 135, 55.6%) were included. There was a mortality rate of 31.3% over the study period. Patients who received abdominal ultrasound as their initial imaging modality (n = 64, 26.3%) were significantly older, had less severe disease, and a significantly lower mortality rate when compared to CT -patients (n = 148, 60.9%). All patients with new hepatic disease detected by ultrasound scans had their management discussed in multi-disciplinary team meetings before their next scheduled CT. Conclusion: In an era where cross-sectional imaging of colorectal cancer is commonplace, abdominal ultrasound offers additional benefit to CT as a postoperative imaging adjunct for the detection of hepatic disease recurrence.

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Surveillance monitoring

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057279391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/liver-ultrasound-useful-part-surveillance-strategy-following-potentially-curative-colorectal-cancer

U2 - 10.1159/000495114

DO - 10.1159/000495114

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 234

EP - 238

JO - Journal of Digestive Diseases

JF - Journal of Digestive Diseases

SN - 1751-2972

IS - 3

ER -