Is oxygen limitation in warming waters a valid mechanism to explain decreased body sizes in aquatic ectotherms?

Asta Audzijonyte (Corresponding Author), Diego R. Barneche, Alan R. Baudron, Jonathan Belmaker, Timothy D. Clark, C. Tara Marshall, John R. Morrongiello, van Rijn Itai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim

The negative correlation between temperature and body size of ectothermic animals (broadly known as a temperature-size rule or TSR) is a widely observed pattern, especially in aquatic organisms. Studies have claimed that TSR arises due to decreased oxygen solubility and increasing metabolic costs at warmer temperatures, whereby oxygen supply to a large body becomes increasingly difficult. However, mixed empirical evidence has led to a controversy about the mechanisms affecting species’ size and performance under different temperatures. We review the main competing genetic, physiological and ecological explanations for TSR and suggest a roadmap to move the field forward.

Location

Global

Taxa

Aquatic ectotherms

Time period

1980 – Present

Results

We show that current studies cannot discriminate among alternative hypotheses and none of the hypotheses can explain all TSR related observations. To resolve the impasse we need experiments and field-sampling programs that specifically compare alternative mechanisms and formally consider energetics, such as costs of growth, oxygen supply and behaviour. We highlight the distinction between evolutionary and plastic mechanisms, and suggest that the oxygen limitation debate should separate processes operating on short, decadal and millennial timescales.

Conclusions

Despite decades of research, we remain uncertain whether TSR is an adaptive response to temperature-related physiological (enzyme activity) or ecological changes (food, predation, other mortality), or a response to constraints operating at a cellular level (oxygen supply and associated costs). To make progress, ecologists, physiologists, modellers and geneticists should work together to develop a cross-disciplinary research program that integrates theory and data, explores time scales over which TSR operates, and assesses limits to adaptation or plasticity. We identify four questions for such a program. Answering these questions is crucial given the widespread impacts of climate change and reliance of management on models that are highly dependent on accurate representation of ecological and physiological responses to temperature.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-77
Number of pages14
JournalGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
Volume28
Issue number2
Early online date16 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Fingerprint

body size
warming
oxygen
temperature
water
cost
timescale
geneticists
aquatic organisms
physiological response
physiologists
aquatic organism
ecologists
research programs
research program
enzyme activity
plasticity
solubility
energetics
plastics

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • alternative mechanisms
  • climate change
  • growth
  • poikilotherm
  • energy budget
  • geometric biology
  • temperature size rule

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology

Cite this

Is oxygen limitation in warming waters a valid mechanism to explain decreased body sizes in aquatic ectotherms? / Audzijonyte, Asta (Corresponding Author); Barneche, Diego R. ; Baudron, Alan R.; Belmaker, Jonathan; Clark, Timothy D.; Marshall, C. Tara; Morrongiello, John R.; Itai, van Rijn.

In: Global Ecology and Biogeography, Vol. 28, No. 2, 01.2019, p. 64-77.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Audzijonyte, A, Barneche, DR, Baudron, AR, Belmaker, J, Clark, TD, Marshall, CT, Morrongiello, JR & Itai, VR 2019, 'Is oxygen limitation in warming waters a valid mechanism to explain decreased body sizes in aquatic ectotherms?', Global Ecology and Biogeography, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12847
Audzijonyte, Asta ; Barneche, Diego R. ; Baudron, Alan R. ; Belmaker, Jonathan ; Clark, Timothy D. ; Marshall, C. Tara ; Morrongiello, John R. ; Itai, van Rijn. / Is oxygen limitation in warming waters a valid mechanism to explain decreased body sizes in aquatic ectotherms?. In: Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 64-77.
@article{b536cec8488c4506ac3436db577e74e1,
title = "Is oxygen limitation in warming waters a valid mechanism to explain decreased body sizes in aquatic ectotherms?",
abstract = "AimThe negative correlation between temperature and body size of ectothermic animals (broadly known as a temperature-size rule or TSR) is a widely observed pattern, especially in aquatic organisms. Studies have claimed that TSR arises due to decreased oxygen solubility and increasing metabolic costs at warmer temperatures, whereby oxygen supply to a large body becomes increasingly difficult. However, mixed empirical evidence has led to a controversy about the mechanisms affecting species’ size and performance under different temperatures. We review the main competing genetic, physiological and ecological explanations for TSR and suggest a roadmap to move the field forward.LocationGlobalTaxaAquatic ectothermsTime period1980 – PresentResultsWe show that current studies cannot discriminate among alternative hypotheses and none of the hypotheses can explain all TSR related observations. To resolve the impasse we need experiments and field-sampling programs that specifically compare alternative mechanisms and formally consider energetics, such as costs of growth, oxygen supply and behaviour. We highlight the distinction between evolutionary and plastic mechanisms, and suggest that the oxygen limitation debate should separate processes operating on short, decadal and millennial timescales.ConclusionsDespite decades of research, we remain uncertain whether TSR is an adaptive response to temperature-related physiological (enzyme activity) or ecological changes (food, predation, other mortality), or a response to constraints operating at a cellular level (oxygen supply and associated costs). To make progress, ecologists, physiologists, modellers and geneticists should work together to develop a cross-disciplinary research program that integrates theory and data, explores time scales over which TSR operates, and assesses limits to adaptation or plasticity. We identify four questions for such a program. Answering these questions is crucial given the widespread impacts of climate change and reliance of management on models that are highly dependent on accurate representation of ecological and physiological responses to temperature.",
keywords = "adaptation, alternative mechanisms, climate change, growth, poikilotherm, energy budget, geometric biology, temperature size rule",
author = "Asta Audzijonyte and Barneche, {Diego R.} and Baudron, {Alan R.} and Jonathan Belmaker and Clark, {Timothy D.} and Marshall, {C. Tara} and Morrongiello, {John R.} and Itai, {van Rijn}",
note = "The authors would like to acknowledge funding from Australian Research Council (grant No. DP170104240) and the Kone Foundation (to AA), Horizon 2020 European research projects ClimeFish (grant No. 677039) (to ARB) and Australian Academy of Science (to JRM)",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/geb.12847",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "64--77",
journal = "Global Ecology and Biogeography",
issn = "1466-822X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is oxygen limitation in warming waters a valid mechanism to explain decreased body sizes in aquatic ectotherms?

AU - Audzijonyte, Asta

AU - Barneche, Diego R.

AU - Baudron, Alan R.

AU - Belmaker, Jonathan

AU - Clark, Timothy D.

AU - Marshall, C. Tara

AU - Morrongiello, John R.

AU - Itai, van Rijn

N1 - The authors would like to acknowledge funding from Australian Research Council (grant No. DP170104240) and the Kone Foundation (to AA), Horizon 2020 European research projects ClimeFish (grant No. 677039) (to ARB) and Australian Academy of Science (to JRM)

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - AimThe negative correlation between temperature and body size of ectothermic animals (broadly known as a temperature-size rule or TSR) is a widely observed pattern, especially in aquatic organisms. Studies have claimed that TSR arises due to decreased oxygen solubility and increasing metabolic costs at warmer temperatures, whereby oxygen supply to a large body becomes increasingly difficult. However, mixed empirical evidence has led to a controversy about the mechanisms affecting species’ size and performance under different temperatures. We review the main competing genetic, physiological and ecological explanations for TSR and suggest a roadmap to move the field forward.LocationGlobalTaxaAquatic ectothermsTime period1980 – PresentResultsWe show that current studies cannot discriminate among alternative hypotheses and none of the hypotheses can explain all TSR related observations. To resolve the impasse we need experiments and field-sampling programs that specifically compare alternative mechanisms and formally consider energetics, such as costs of growth, oxygen supply and behaviour. We highlight the distinction between evolutionary and plastic mechanisms, and suggest that the oxygen limitation debate should separate processes operating on short, decadal and millennial timescales.ConclusionsDespite decades of research, we remain uncertain whether TSR is an adaptive response to temperature-related physiological (enzyme activity) or ecological changes (food, predation, other mortality), or a response to constraints operating at a cellular level (oxygen supply and associated costs). To make progress, ecologists, physiologists, modellers and geneticists should work together to develop a cross-disciplinary research program that integrates theory and data, explores time scales over which TSR operates, and assesses limits to adaptation or plasticity. We identify four questions for such a program. Answering these questions is crucial given the widespread impacts of climate change and reliance of management on models that are highly dependent on accurate representation of ecological and physiological responses to temperature.

AB - AimThe negative correlation between temperature and body size of ectothermic animals (broadly known as a temperature-size rule or TSR) is a widely observed pattern, especially in aquatic organisms. Studies have claimed that TSR arises due to decreased oxygen solubility and increasing metabolic costs at warmer temperatures, whereby oxygen supply to a large body becomes increasingly difficult. However, mixed empirical evidence has led to a controversy about the mechanisms affecting species’ size and performance under different temperatures. We review the main competing genetic, physiological and ecological explanations for TSR and suggest a roadmap to move the field forward.LocationGlobalTaxaAquatic ectothermsTime period1980 – PresentResultsWe show that current studies cannot discriminate among alternative hypotheses and none of the hypotheses can explain all TSR related observations. To resolve the impasse we need experiments and field-sampling programs that specifically compare alternative mechanisms and formally consider energetics, such as costs of growth, oxygen supply and behaviour. We highlight the distinction between evolutionary and plastic mechanisms, and suggest that the oxygen limitation debate should separate processes operating on short, decadal and millennial timescales.ConclusionsDespite decades of research, we remain uncertain whether TSR is an adaptive response to temperature-related physiological (enzyme activity) or ecological changes (food, predation, other mortality), or a response to constraints operating at a cellular level (oxygen supply and associated costs). To make progress, ecologists, physiologists, modellers and geneticists should work together to develop a cross-disciplinary research program that integrates theory and data, explores time scales over which TSR operates, and assesses limits to adaptation or plasticity. We identify four questions for such a program. Answering these questions is crucial given the widespread impacts of climate change and reliance of management on models that are highly dependent on accurate representation of ecological and physiological responses to temperature.

KW - adaptation

KW - alternative mechanisms

KW - climate change

KW - growth

KW - poikilotherm

KW - energy budget

KW - geometric biology

KW - temperature size rule

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056615942&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/oxygen-limitation-warming-waters-valid-mechanism-explain-decreased-body-sizes-aquatic-ectotherms

U2 - 10.1111/geb.12847

DO - 10.1111/geb.12847

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 64

EP - 77

JO - Global Ecology and Biogeography

JF - Global Ecology and Biogeography

SN - 1466-822X

IS - 2

ER -