Is there an Archaeological Potential for a Sociology of Landing Sites?

Kristin Ilves

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Repeatedly, archaeological research on landing sites draws upon the equivalence between a naturally suitable coast and a landing site/harbour. This kind of research emanates from an archaeologically and socially ill-defined landing site concept and has created a basis for arbitrary discussions on the nature of maritime activities of past societies. There is no comprehensive and integrated understanding of the existing variability, character and patterns of landing site behaviour and relations. This article addresses the question of what characterises landing sites for watercrafts in an archaeological and social perspective. If such characteristics can be defined, what are the possibilities of seeing any of these traits in an archaeological material? Defining a landing site as a contact zone where movements and meetings on land and by watercraft take place and are facilitated by the locality as such, a generally applicable model for the archaeological study of landing sites is suggested and checked against three different archaeological case studies from the Baltic Sea region.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-31
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Archaeology and Ancient History
Volume2
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

sociology
harbor
equivalence
contact
society

Keywords

  • archaeology
  • Baltic Sea region
  • Fribrødre Å
  • harbour
  • Krogen Island
  • landing site
  • model of interaction
  • Maritime archaeology
  • Maritime cultural landscape
  • sociology of landing sites
  • Tornimäe

Cite this

Is there an Archaeological Potential for a Sociology of Landing Sites? / Ilves, Kristin.

In: Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History, Vol. 2, 2011, p. 1-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3e5f338630674fa6ae772d2f23a10d2e,
title = "Is there an Archaeological Potential for a Sociology of Landing Sites?",
abstract = "Repeatedly, archaeological research on landing sites draws upon the equivalence between a naturally suitable coast and a landing site/harbour. This kind of research emanates from an archaeologically and socially ill-defined landing site concept and has created a basis for arbitrary discussions on the nature of maritime activities of past societies. There is no comprehensive and integrated understanding of the existing variability, character and patterns of landing site behaviour and relations. This article addresses the question of what characterises landing sites for watercrafts in an archaeological and social perspective. If such characteristics can be defined, what are the possibilities of seeing any of these traits in an archaeological material? Defining a landing site as a contact zone where movements and meetings on land and by watercraft take place and are facilitated by the locality as such, a generally applicable model for the archaeological study of landing sites is suggested and checked against three different archaeological case studies from the Baltic Sea region.",
keywords = "archaeology, Baltic Sea region, Fribr{\o}dre {\AA}, harbour, Krogen Island, landing site, model of interaction, Maritime archaeology, Maritime cultural landscape, sociology of landing sites, Tornim{\"a}e",
author = "Kristin Ilves",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "1--31",
journal = "Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there an Archaeological Potential for a Sociology of Landing Sites?

AU - Ilves, Kristin

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Repeatedly, archaeological research on landing sites draws upon the equivalence between a naturally suitable coast and a landing site/harbour. This kind of research emanates from an archaeologically and socially ill-defined landing site concept and has created a basis for arbitrary discussions on the nature of maritime activities of past societies. There is no comprehensive and integrated understanding of the existing variability, character and patterns of landing site behaviour and relations. This article addresses the question of what characterises landing sites for watercrafts in an archaeological and social perspective. If such characteristics can be defined, what are the possibilities of seeing any of these traits in an archaeological material? Defining a landing site as a contact zone where movements and meetings on land and by watercraft take place and are facilitated by the locality as such, a generally applicable model for the archaeological study of landing sites is suggested and checked against three different archaeological case studies from the Baltic Sea region.

AB - Repeatedly, archaeological research on landing sites draws upon the equivalence between a naturally suitable coast and a landing site/harbour. This kind of research emanates from an archaeologically and socially ill-defined landing site concept and has created a basis for arbitrary discussions on the nature of maritime activities of past societies. There is no comprehensive and integrated understanding of the existing variability, character and patterns of landing site behaviour and relations. This article addresses the question of what characterises landing sites for watercrafts in an archaeological and social perspective. If such characteristics can be defined, what are the possibilities of seeing any of these traits in an archaeological material? Defining a landing site as a contact zone where movements and meetings on land and by watercraft take place and are facilitated by the locality as such, a generally applicable model for the archaeological study of landing sites is suggested and checked against three different archaeological case studies from the Baltic Sea region.

KW - archaeology

KW - Baltic Sea region

KW - Fribrødre Å

KW - harbour

KW - Krogen Island

KW - landing site

KW - model of interaction

KW - Maritime archaeology

KW - Maritime cultural landscape

KW - sociology of landing sites

KW - Tornimäe

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 1

EP - 31

JO - Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History

JF - Journal of Archaeology and Ancient History

ER -