Jurisengineering instead of judges and juries?

Research output: Non-textual formWebsite, Blog, Social Media

Abstract

David Lorimer applies a quantitatively analytical approach to criminal law. He has written previously for SLN on jury analysis and the admissibility of prejudicial evidence (with a journal paper currently under peer review). In this article he indicates how his work led to similar conclusions to research featured in a recent article in The Times. He highlights two key legally problematic factors which substantiate the Times article’s empirical research findings from a more analytical perspective.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherScottish Legal News
Publication statusPublished - 4 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Jurisengineering instead of judges and juries?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this