Jus circa sacra

Elements of theological politics in 17th Century Philosophy: From Hobbes and Spinoza to Leibniz

Mogens Laerke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The theologico-political reflection in 17th Century rationalism was marked by a long experience of unresoluble religious division and by the dissociation of speculative theology and natural philosophy caused by the advance of the natural sciences. One of the main theological problems discussed in philosophy was that of the judge of controversies, i.e. the problem of the interpretative authority in religion closely linked to the key question concerning the political right over holy matters or jus circa sacra. Taking departure in these general determinations, and after a short historiographical review of the relations between Hobbes, Spinoza and Leibniz, the article outlines the theologico-political theories of Hobbes and Spinoza on jus circa sacra, and discusses how these are reflected and criticised in Leibniz's more moderate and traditional theory. Through expositions of their fundamentally different conceptions of divine nature and law, the article compares how these give rise to three different systems for formulating the relations of authority between Church, State and individual. The article concentrates in particular on showing how Leibniz proposes an alternative to Hobbes's absolutist position and Spinoza's defence of religious liberty that can be understood as a complex balance of authorities based upon a juridical logic of presumptions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-64
Number of pages25
JournalDistinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

politics
natural philosophy
state church
rationalism
political right
political theory
natural sciences
theology
Religion
Law
philosophy
experience

Keywords

  • divine law
  • Hobbes
  • Leibniz
  • natural light
  • politics
  • rationalism
  • Spinoza
  • theology

Cite this

@article{5c92a85aabfc4d2bae42c0c438babd66,
title = "Jus circa sacra: Elements of theological politics in 17th Century Philosophy: From Hobbes and Spinoza to Leibniz",
abstract = "The theologico-political reflection in 17th Century rationalism was marked by a long experience of unresoluble religious division and by the dissociation of speculative theology and natural philosophy caused by the advance of the natural sciences. One of the main theological problems discussed in philosophy was that of the judge of controversies, i.e. the problem of the interpretative authority in religion closely linked to the key question concerning the political right over holy matters or jus circa sacra. Taking departure in these general determinations, and after a short historiographical review of the relations between Hobbes, Spinoza and Leibniz, the article outlines the theologico-political theories of Hobbes and Spinoza on jus circa sacra, and discusses how these are reflected and criticised in Leibniz's more moderate and traditional theory. Through expositions of their fundamentally different conceptions of divine nature and law, the article compares how these give rise to three different systems for formulating the relations of authority between Church, State and individual. The article concentrates in particular on showing how Leibniz proposes an alternative to Hobbes's absolutist position and Spinoza's defence of religious liberty that can be understood as a complex balance of authorities based upon a juridical logic of presumptions.",
keywords = "divine law, Hobbes, Leibniz, natural light, politics, rationalism, Spinoza, theology",
author = "Mogens Laerke",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/1600910X.2005.9672902",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "41--64",
journal = "Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory",
issn = "1600-910X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Jus circa sacra

T2 - Elements of theological politics in 17th Century Philosophy: From Hobbes and Spinoza to Leibniz

AU - Laerke, Mogens

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The theologico-political reflection in 17th Century rationalism was marked by a long experience of unresoluble religious division and by the dissociation of speculative theology and natural philosophy caused by the advance of the natural sciences. One of the main theological problems discussed in philosophy was that of the judge of controversies, i.e. the problem of the interpretative authority in religion closely linked to the key question concerning the political right over holy matters or jus circa sacra. Taking departure in these general determinations, and after a short historiographical review of the relations between Hobbes, Spinoza and Leibniz, the article outlines the theologico-political theories of Hobbes and Spinoza on jus circa sacra, and discusses how these are reflected and criticised in Leibniz's more moderate and traditional theory. Through expositions of their fundamentally different conceptions of divine nature and law, the article compares how these give rise to three different systems for formulating the relations of authority between Church, State and individual. The article concentrates in particular on showing how Leibniz proposes an alternative to Hobbes's absolutist position and Spinoza's defence of religious liberty that can be understood as a complex balance of authorities based upon a juridical logic of presumptions.

AB - The theologico-political reflection in 17th Century rationalism was marked by a long experience of unresoluble religious division and by the dissociation of speculative theology and natural philosophy caused by the advance of the natural sciences. One of the main theological problems discussed in philosophy was that of the judge of controversies, i.e. the problem of the interpretative authority in religion closely linked to the key question concerning the political right over holy matters or jus circa sacra. Taking departure in these general determinations, and after a short historiographical review of the relations between Hobbes, Spinoza and Leibniz, the article outlines the theologico-political theories of Hobbes and Spinoza on jus circa sacra, and discusses how these are reflected and criticised in Leibniz's more moderate and traditional theory. Through expositions of their fundamentally different conceptions of divine nature and law, the article compares how these give rise to three different systems for formulating the relations of authority between Church, State and individual. The article concentrates in particular on showing how Leibniz proposes an alternative to Hobbes's absolutist position and Spinoza's defence of religious liberty that can be understood as a complex balance of authorities based upon a juridical logic of presumptions.

KW - divine law

KW - Hobbes

KW - Leibniz

KW - natural light

KW - politics

KW - rationalism

KW - Spinoza

KW - theology

U2 - 10.1080/1600910X.2005.9672902

DO - 10.1080/1600910X.2005.9672902

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 41

EP - 64

JO - Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory

JF - Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory

SN - 1600-910X

IS - 1

ER -