Kaupapa Maori research methodology

a critique and an alternative

Dannette Marie, Brian Haig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper expresses a number of concerns about the uncritical acceptance of kaupapa Maori research (KMR) methodology in New Zealand science policy deliberations and many areas of research theory and practice. We begin by discussing KMR methodology within the context of postcolonial science studies, and then question its commitment to a relativistic view of science. The relationship between political ideology and science policy is then discussed. Thereafter, a brief characterisation, and critique, of a number of features of KMR methodology are offered, and it is suggested that a scientific realist methodology provides a good basis for research that is designed to produce worthwhile knowledge. Specifically, a pragmatic realist methodology is offered to KMR adherents as an approach that could effectively meet their stated research objectives. We conclude by urging KMR advocates to reconsider the merits of their view of methodology in the light of the strengths of scientific realist methodology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-21
JournalNew Zealand Science Review
Volume63
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2006

Fingerprint

methodology
science policy
political ideology
science studies
deliberation
political science
New Zealand
pragmatics
acceptance
commitment
science

Cite this

Kaupapa Maori research methodology : a critique and an alternative. / Marie, Dannette; Haig, Brian.

In: New Zealand Science Review, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2006, p. 17-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marie, Dannette ; Haig, Brian. / Kaupapa Maori research methodology : a critique and an alternative. In: New Zealand Science Review. 2006 ; Vol. 63, No. 1. pp. 17-21.
@article{cd294555370b4c79b85edc12bf43bd42,
title = "Kaupapa Maori research methodology: a critique and an alternative",
abstract = "This paper expresses a number of concerns about the uncritical acceptance of kaupapa Maori research (KMR) methodology in New Zealand science policy deliberations and many areas of research theory and practice. We begin by discussing KMR methodology within the context of postcolonial science studies, and then question its commitment to a relativistic view of science. The relationship between political ideology and science policy is then discussed. Thereafter, a brief characterisation, and critique, of a number of features of KMR methodology are offered, and it is suggested that a scientific realist methodology provides a good basis for research that is designed to produce worthwhile knowledge. Specifically, a pragmatic realist methodology is offered to KMR adherents as an approach that could effectively meet their stated research objectives. We conclude by urging KMR advocates to reconsider the merits of their view of methodology in the light of the strengths of scientific realist methodology.",
author = "Dannette Marie and Brian Haig",
year = "2006",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "17--21",
journal = "New Zealand Science Review",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Kaupapa Maori research methodology

T2 - a critique and an alternative

AU - Marie, Dannette

AU - Haig, Brian

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper expresses a number of concerns about the uncritical acceptance of kaupapa Maori research (KMR) methodology in New Zealand science policy deliberations and many areas of research theory and practice. We begin by discussing KMR methodology within the context of postcolonial science studies, and then question its commitment to a relativistic view of science. The relationship between political ideology and science policy is then discussed. Thereafter, a brief characterisation, and critique, of a number of features of KMR methodology are offered, and it is suggested that a scientific realist methodology provides a good basis for research that is designed to produce worthwhile knowledge. Specifically, a pragmatic realist methodology is offered to KMR adherents as an approach that could effectively meet their stated research objectives. We conclude by urging KMR advocates to reconsider the merits of their view of methodology in the light of the strengths of scientific realist methodology.

AB - This paper expresses a number of concerns about the uncritical acceptance of kaupapa Maori research (KMR) methodology in New Zealand science policy deliberations and many areas of research theory and practice. We begin by discussing KMR methodology within the context of postcolonial science studies, and then question its commitment to a relativistic view of science. The relationship between political ideology and science policy is then discussed. Thereafter, a brief characterisation, and critique, of a number of features of KMR methodology are offered, and it is suggested that a scientific realist methodology provides a good basis for research that is designed to produce worthwhile knowledge. Specifically, a pragmatic realist methodology is offered to KMR adherents as an approach that could effectively meet their stated research objectives. We conclude by urging KMR advocates to reconsider the merits of their view of methodology in the light of the strengths of scientific realist methodology.

M3 - Article

VL - 63

SP - 17

EP - 21

JO - New Zealand Science Review

JF - New Zealand Science Review

IS - 1

ER -