Keeping an eye on cost: what can eye tracking tell us about attention to cost information in discrete choice experiments?

Mesfin Genie, Mandy Ryan* (Corresponding Author), Nicolas Krucien

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Concern has been expressed about including a cost attribute within discrete choice experiments (DCEs) when individuals do not have to pay at the point of consumption. We use eye tracking to investigate attention to cost when valuing publicly financed health care. 104 individuals completed a DCE concerned with preferences for UK general practitioner (GP) appointments: 51 responded to a DCE with cost included and 53 to the same DCE without cost. Eye-movements were tracked whilst respondents completed the DCE. We assessed if respondents pay attention to cost. We then compare fixation time on attributes, eye movement patterns and mental effort across the experimental groups. Results are encouraging for the inclusion of cost in DCEs valuing publicly provided healthcare. Most respondents gave visual attention to the cost attribute most of the time. Average fixation time on multi-attribute tasks increased by 44% in the cost DCE, with attention to non-monetary attributes increasing by 22%. Including cost led to more structured decision-making and did not increase mental effort. Acceptability of the cost attribute and difficulty of choice tasks were predictors of cost information processing, highlighting the importance of both motivating the cost attribute and considering difficulty of the tasks when developing DCEs.
Original languageEnglish
JournalHealth Economics
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 26 Jan 2023


  • Cost Information processing
  • Discrete choice experiment
  • Eye-tracking
  • Multiattribute choices


Dive into the research topics of 'Keeping an eye on cost: what can eye tracking tell us about attention to cost information in discrete choice experiments?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this