Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance

Bruce Osborne, Matt Saunders, David Walmsley, Michael Jones, Pete Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The geographic spread of croplands, together with the diversity of crops and management practices, and the largely seasonally-restricted cycle of crop production, complicates a detailed assessment of the cropland carbon or greenhouse gas balance at the European/continental scale. Whilst the major components that contribute to the carbon budget at the ecosystem scale have been identified, a number of additional factors/parameters remain to be quantified, such as a more detailed assessment of both the direct and indirect impacts of volatile organic carbon production. In addition, there are various ways in which improved estimates of the carbon balance might be achieved, some of which are largely specific to croplands, whilst others are of more general relevance. These include a more detailed examination of dissolved organic as well as inorganic carbon fluxes, more extensive measurements of non-carbon greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, and their fluxes between the atmosphere and the soil, rather than just focussing on losses, and improved measurement protocols, particularly the partitioning of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. In addition, there is a need for improved spatial resolution, either through more intensive sampling and/or the employment and development of new technology that can be used for making continuous measurements over larger areas of land. Relatively straightforward assessments of the inputs and losses associated with harvests and the use of organic fertilizers are also required. The quantitative significance of fires is also unclear, with a potential complexity of interactions with soil and atmospheric processes that are not reflected in current assessments. Finally, a more comprehensive coverage of the dominant crops/cropping systems are required before we can say that the budgets are truly reflective of the major European cropland ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)293-301
Number of pages9
JournalAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment
Volume139
Issue number3
Early online date23 Jun 2010
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Nov 2010

Fingerprint

greenhouse gases
greenhouse gas
uncertainty
organic carbon
crop
carbon
ecosystem
carbon balance
carbon budget
inorganic carbon
carbon flux
nitrous oxide
crop production
cropping practice
management practice
respiration
spatial resolution
partitioning
methane
fertilizer

Keywords

  • carbon/greenhouse gas budgets
  • component fluxes
  • cropland diversity
  • missing values
  • uncertainties
  • net ecosystem exchange
  • wind erosion
  • filling strategies
  • ammonia emissions
  • root herbivory
  • organic-carbon
  • CO2 exchange
  • long-term
  • soil
  • respiration

Cite this

Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance. / Osborne, Bruce; Saunders, Matt; Walmsley, David; Jones, Michael; Smith, Pete.

In: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 139, No. 3, 15.11.2010, p. 293-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Osborne, Bruce ; Saunders, Matt ; Walmsley, David ; Jones, Michael ; Smith, Pete. / Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance. In: Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 2010 ; Vol. 139, No. 3. pp. 293-301.
@article{dfff1fe60a7b4f43b7abb120ac25b5a5,
title = "Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance",
abstract = "The geographic spread of croplands, together with the diversity of crops and management practices, and the largely seasonally-restricted cycle of crop production, complicates a detailed assessment of the cropland carbon or greenhouse gas balance at the European/continental scale. Whilst the major components that contribute to the carbon budget at the ecosystem scale have been identified, a number of additional factors/parameters remain to be quantified, such as a more detailed assessment of both the direct and indirect impacts of volatile organic carbon production. In addition, there are various ways in which improved estimates of the carbon balance might be achieved, some of which are largely specific to croplands, whilst others are of more general relevance. These include a more detailed examination of dissolved organic as well as inorganic carbon fluxes, more extensive measurements of non-carbon greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, and their fluxes between the atmosphere and the soil, rather than just focussing on losses, and improved measurement protocols, particularly the partitioning of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. In addition, there is a need for improved spatial resolution, either through more intensive sampling and/or the employment and development of new technology that can be used for making continuous measurements over larger areas of land. Relatively straightforward assessments of the inputs and losses associated with harvests and the use of organic fertilizers are also required. The quantitative significance of fires is also unclear, with a potential complexity of interactions with soil and atmospheric processes that are not reflected in current assessments. Finally, a more comprehensive coverage of the dominant crops/cropping systems are required before we can say that the budgets are truly reflective of the major European cropland ecosystems.",
keywords = "carbon/greenhouse gas budgets, component fluxes, cropland diversity, missing values, uncertainties, net ecosystem exchange, wind erosion, filling strategies, ammonia emissions, root herbivory, organic-carbon, CO2 exchange, long-term, soil, respiration",
author = "Bruce Osborne and Matt Saunders and David Walmsley and Michael Jones and Pete Smith",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.009",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "293--301",
journal = "Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Key questions and uncertainties associated with the assessment of the cropland greenhouse gas balance

AU - Osborne, Bruce

AU - Saunders, Matt

AU - Walmsley, David

AU - Jones, Michael

AU - Smith, Pete

PY - 2010/11/15

Y1 - 2010/11/15

N2 - The geographic spread of croplands, together with the diversity of crops and management practices, and the largely seasonally-restricted cycle of crop production, complicates a detailed assessment of the cropland carbon or greenhouse gas balance at the European/continental scale. Whilst the major components that contribute to the carbon budget at the ecosystem scale have been identified, a number of additional factors/parameters remain to be quantified, such as a more detailed assessment of both the direct and indirect impacts of volatile organic carbon production. In addition, there are various ways in which improved estimates of the carbon balance might be achieved, some of which are largely specific to croplands, whilst others are of more general relevance. These include a more detailed examination of dissolved organic as well as inorganic carbon fluxes, more extensive measurements of non-carbon greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, and their fluxes between the atmosphere and the soil, rather than just focussing on losses, and improved measurement protocols, particularly the partitioning of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. In addition, there is a need for improved spatial resolution, either through more intensive sampling and/or the employment and development of new technology that can be used for making continuous measurements over larger areas of land. Relatively straightforward assessments of the inputs and losses associated with harvests and the use of organic fertilizers are also required. The quantitative significance of fires is also unclear, with a potential complexity of interactions with soil and atmospheric processes that are not reflected in current assessments. Finally, a more comprehensive coverage of the dominant crops/cropping systems are required before we can say that the budgets are truly reflective of the major European cropland ecosystems.

AB - The geographic spread of croplands, together with the diversity of crops and management practices, and the largely seasonally-restricted cycle of crop production, complicates a detailed assessment of the cropland carbon or greenhouse gas balance at the European/continental scale. Whilst the major components that contribute to the carbon budget at the ecosystem scale have been identified, a number of additional factors/parameters remain to be quantified, such as a more detailed assessment of both the direct and indirect impacts of volatile organic carbon production. In addition, there are various ways in which improved estimates of the carbon balance might be achieved, some of which are largely specific to croplands, whilst others are of more general relevance. These include a more detailed examination of dissolved organic as well as inorganic carbon fluxes, more extensive measurements of non-carbon greenhouse gases, such as methane and nitrous oxide, and their fluxes between the atmosphere and the soil, rather than just focussing on losses, and improved measurement protocols, particularly the partitioning of heterotrophic and autotrophic respiration. In addition, there is a need for improved spatial resolution, either through more intensive sampling and/or the employment and development of new technology that can be used for making continuous measurements over larger areas of land. Relatively straightforward assessments of the inputs and losses associated with harvests and the use of organic fertilizers are also required. The quantitative significance of fires is also unclear, with a potential complexity of interactions with soil and atmospheric processes that are not reflected in current assessments. Finally, a more comprehensive coverage of the dominant crops/cropping systems are required before we can say that the budgets are truly reflective of the major European cropland ecosystems.

KW - carbon/greenhouse gas budgets

KW - component fluxes

KW - cropland diversity

KW - missing values

KW - uncertainties

KW - net ecosystem exchange

KW - wind erosion

KW - filling strategies

KW - ammonia emissions

KW - root herbivory

KW - organic-carbon

KW - CO2 exchange

KW - long-term

KW - soil

KW - respiration

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.009

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2010.05.009

M3 - Article

VL - 139

SP - 293

EP - 301

JO - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

JF - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

SN - 0167-8809

IS - 3

ER -