Knowledge exchange

a review and research agenda for environmental management

Ioan Fazey*, Anna C. Evely, Mark S. Reed, Lindsay C. Stringer, Joanneke Kruijsen, Piran C. L. White, Andrew Newsham, Lixian Jin, Martin Cortazzi, Jeremy Phillipson, Kirsty Blackstock, Noel Entwistle, William Sheate, Fiona Armstrong, Chris Blackmore, John Fazey, Julie Ingram, Jon Gregson, Philip Lowe, Sarah Morton & 1 others Chris Trevitt

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

131 Citations (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is increasing emphasis on the need for effective ways of sharing knowledge to enhance environmental management and sustainability. Knowledge exchange (KE) are processes that generate, share and/or use knowledge through various methods appropriate to the context, purpose, and participants involved. KE includes concepts such as sharing, generation, coproduction, comanagement, and brokerage of knowledge. This paper elicits the expert knowledge of academics involved in research and practice of KE from different disciplines and backgrounds to review research themes, identify gaps and questions, and develop a research agenda for furthering understanding about KE. Results include 80 research questions prefaced by a review of research themes. Key conclusions are: (1) there is a diverse range of questions relating to KE that require attention; (2) there is a particular need for research on understanding the process of KE and how KE can be evaluated; and (3) given the strong interdependency of research questions, an integrated approach to understanding KE is required. To improve understanding of KE, action research methodologies and embedding evaluation as a normal part of KE research and practice need to be encouraged. This will foster more adaptive approaches to learning about KE and enhance effectiveness of environmental management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-36
Number of pages18
JournalEnvironmental Conservation
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date24 Sep 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2013

Keywords

  • adaptive comanagement
  • decision-making
  • environmental management
  • evidence-based conservation
  • knowledge exchange
  • knowledge management
  • knowledge transfer
  • participation
  • research impact
  • social learning
  • biodiversity conservation
  • participatory development
  • ecosystem services
  • science
  • policy
  • translation
  • framework
  • payments
  • systems
  • future

Cite this

Fazey, I., Evely, A. C., Reed, M. S., Stringer, L. C., Kruijsen, J., White, P. C. L., ... Trevitt, C. (2013). Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation, 40(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689291200029X

Knowledge exchange : a review and research agenda for environmental management. / Fazey, Ioan; Evely, Anna C.; Reed, Mark S.; Stringer, Lindsay C.; Kruijsen, Joanneke; White, Piran C. L.; Newsham, Andrew; Jin, Lixian; Cortazzi, Martin; Phillipson, Jeremy; Blackstock, Kirsty; Entwistle, Noel; Sheate, William; Armstrong, Fiona; Blackmore, Chris; Fazey, John; Ingram, Julie; Gregson, Jon; Lowe, Philip; Morton, Sarah; Trevitt, Chris.

In: Environmental Conservation, Vol. 40, No. 1, 03.2013, p. 19-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalLiterature review

Fazey, I, Evely, AC, Reed, MS, Stringer, LC, Kruijsen, J, White, PCL, Newsham, A, Jin, L, Cortazzi, M, Phillipson, J, Blackstock, K, Entwistle, N, Sheate, W, Armstrong, F, Blackmore, C, Fazey, J, Ingram, J, Gregson, J, Lowe, P, Morton, S & Trevitt, C 2013, 'Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management', Environmental Conservation, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689291200029X
Fazey I, Evely AC, Reed MS, Stringer LC, Kruijsen J, White PCL et al. Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management. Environmental Conservation. 2013 Mar;40(1):19-36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S037689291200029X
Fazey, Ioan ; Evely, Anna C. ; Reed, Mark S. ; Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Kruijsen, Joanneke ; White, Piran C. L. ; Newsham, Andrew ; Jin, Lixian ; Cortazzi, Martin ; Phillipson, Jeremy ; Blackstock, Kirsty ; Entwistle, Noel ; Sheate, William ; Armstrong, Fiona ; Blackmore, Chris ; Fazey, John ; Ingram, Julie ; Gregson, Jon ; Lowe, Philip ; Morton, Sarah ; Trevitt, Chris. / Knowledge exchange : a review and research agenda for environmental management. In: Environmental Conservation. 2013 ; Vol. 40, No. 1. pp. 19-36.
@article{bac84d75d7ac4baea7862f0f51e89392,
title = "Knowledge exchange: a review and research agenda for environmental management",
abstract = "There is increasing emphasis on the need for effective ways of sharing knowledge to enhance environmental management and sustainability. Knowledge exchange (KE) are processes that generate, share and/or use knowledge through various methods appropriate to the context, purpose, and participants involved. KE includes concepts such as sharing, generation, coproduction, comanagement, and brokerage of knowledge. This paper elicits the expert knowledge of academics involved in research and practice of KE from different disciplines and backgrounds to review research themes, identify gaps and questions, and develop a research agenda for furthering understanding about KE. Results include 80 research questions prefaced by a review of research themes. Key conclusions are: (1) there is a diverse range of questions relating to KE that require attention; (2) there is a particular need for research on understanding the process of KE and how KE can be evaluated; and (3) given the strong interdependency of research questions, an integrated approach to understanding KE is required. To improve understanding of KE, action research methodologies and embedding evaluation as a normal part of KE research and practice need to be encouraged. This will foster more adaptive approaches to learning about KE and enhance effectiveness of environmental management.",
keywords = "adaptive comanagement, decision-making, environmental management, evidence-based conservation, knowledge exchange, knowledge management, knowledge transfer, participation, research impact, social learning, biodiversity conservation, participatory development, ecosystem services, science, policy, translation, framework, payments, systems, future",
author = "Ioan Fazey and Evely, {Anna C.} and Reed, {Mark S.} and Stringer, {Lindsay C.} and Joanneke Kruijsen and White, {Piran C. L.} and Andrew Newsham and Lixian Jin and Martin Cortazzi and Jeremy Phillipson and Kirsty Blackstock and Noel Entwistle and William Sheate and Fiona Armstrong and Chris Blackmore and John Fazey and Julie Ingram and Jon Gregson and Philip Lowe and Sarah Morton and Chris Trevitt",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1017/S037689291200029X",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "19--36",
journal = "Environmental Conservation",
issn = "0376-8929",
publisher = "Cambridge Univ. Press.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge exchange

T2 - a review and research agenda for environmental management

AU - Fazey, Ioan

AU - Evely, Anna C.

AU - Reed, Mark S.

AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

AU - Kruijsen, Joanneke

AU - White, Piran C. L.

AU - Newsham, Andrew

AU - Jin, Lixian

AU - Cortazzi, Martin

AU - Phillipson, Jeremy

AU - Blackstock, Kirsty

AU - Entwistle, Noel

AU - Sheate, William

AU - Armstrong, Fiona

AU - Blackmore, Chris

AU - Fazey, John

AU - Ingram, Julie

AU - Gregson, Jon

AU - Lowe, Philip

AU - Morton, Sarah

AU - Trevitt, Chris

PY - 2013/3

Y1 - 2013/3

N2 - There is increasing emphasis on the need for effective ways of sharing knowledge to enhance environmental management and sustainability. Knowledge exchange (KE) are processes that generate, share and/or use knowledge through various methods appropriate to the context, purpose, and participants involved. KE includes concepts such as sharing, generation, coproduction, comanagement, and brokerage of knowledge. This paper elicits the expert knowledge of academics involved in research and practice of KE from different disciplines and backgrounds to review research themes, identify gaps and questions, and develop a research agenda for furthering understanding about KE. Results include 80 research questions prefaced by a review of research themes. Key conclusions are: (1) there is a diverse range of questions relating to KE that require attention; (2) there is a particular need for research on understanding the process of KE and how KE can be evaluated; and (3) given the strong interdependency of research questions, an integrated approach to understanding KE is required. To improve understanding of KE, action research methodologies and embedding evaluation as a normal part of KE research and practice need to be encouraged. This will foster more adaptive approaches to learning about KE and enhance effectiveness of environmental management.

AB - There is increasing emphasis on the need for effective ways of sharing knowledge to enhance environmental management and sustainability. Knowledge exchange (KE) are processes that generate, share and/or use knowledge through various methods appropriate to the context, purpose, and participants involved. KE includes concepts such as sharing, generation, coproduction, comanagement, and brokerage of knowledge. This paper elicits the expert knowledge of academics involved in research and practice of KE from different disciplines and backgrounds to review research themes, identify gaps and questions, and develop a research agenda for furthering understanding about KE. Results include 80 research questions prefaced by a review of research themes. Key conclusions are: (1) there is a diverse range of questions relating to KE that require attention; (2) there is a particular need for research on understanding the process of KE and how KE can be evaluated; and (3) given the strong interdependency of research questions, an integrated approach to understanding KE is required. To improve understanding of KE, action research methodologies and embedding evaluation as a normal part of KE research and practice need to be encouraged. This will foster more adaptive approaches to learning about KE and enhance effectiveness of environmental management.

KW - adaptive comanagement

KW - decision-making

KW - environmental management

KW - evidence-based conservation

KW - knowledge exchange

KW - knowledge management

KW - knowledge transfer

KW - participation

KW - research impact

KW - social learning

KW - biodiversity conservation

KW - participatory development

KW - ecosystem services

KW - science

KW - policy

KW - translation

KW - framework

KW - payments

KW - systems

KW - future

U2 - 10.1017/S037689291200029X

DO - 10.1017/S037689291200029X

M3 - Literature review

VL - 40

SP - 19

EP - 36

JO - Environmental Conservation

JF - Environmental Conservation

SN - 0376-8929

IS - 1

ER -