‘Knowledge once divided can be hard to put together again’

an epistemological critique of collaborative and team-based research practices

Natasha Susan Mauthner, Andrea Doucet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

65 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article critically examines team and collaborative research as an 'academic mode of production'. Our main argument is that while theoretically qualitative social science research is rooted within a postfoundational epistemological paradigm, normative team-based research practices embody foundational principles. Team research relies on a division of labour that creates divisions and hierarchies of knowledge, particularly between researchers who gather embodied and contextual knowledge 'in the field' and those who produce textual knowledge 'in the office'. We argue that a theoretical commitment to a postfoundational epistemology demands that we translate this into concrete research practices that rely on concerted team-based relations rather than divisions of labour, and a reflexive research practice that strives to involve all team members in all aspects of knowledge construction processes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)971-985
Number of pages15
JournalSociology
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2008

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • contextual knowledge
  • divisions of knowledge
  • divisions of labour
  • embodied knowledge
  • epistemology
  • reflexivity
  • research teams
  • textual knowledge
  • qualitative data

Cite this

‘Knowledge once divided can be hard to put together again’ : an epistemological critique of collaborative and team-based research practices. / Mauthner, Natasha Susan; Doucet, Andrea.

In: Sociology, Vol. 42, No. 5, 10.2008, p. 971-985.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d12b8278ea82406f89d7400c225c4644,
title = "‘Knowledge once divided can be hard to put together again’: an epistemological critique of collaborative and team-based research practices",
abstract = "This article critically examines team and collaborative research as an 'academic mode of production'. Our main argument is that while theoretically qualitative social science research is rooted within a postfoundational epistemological paradigm, normative team-based research practices embody foundational principles. Team research relies on a division of labour that creates divisions and hierarchies of knowledge, particularly between researchers who gather embodied and contextual knowledge 'in the field' and those who produce textual knowledge 'in the office'. We argue that a theoretical commitment to a postfoundational epistemology demands that we translate this into concrete research practices that rely on concerted team-based relations rather than divisions of labour, and a reflexive research practice that strives to involve all team members in all aspects of knowledge construction processes.",
keywords = "collaboration, contextual knowledge, divisions of knowledge, divisions of labour, embodied knowledge, epistemology, reflexivity, research teams, textual knowledge, qualitative data",
author = "Mauthner, {Natasha Susan} and Andrea Doucet",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1177/0038038508094574",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "971--985",
journal = "Sociology",
issn = "0038-0385",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ‘Knowledge once divided can be hard to put together again’

T2 - an epistemological critique of collaborative and team-based research practices

AU - Mauthner, Natasha Susan

AU - Doucet, Andrea

PY - 2008/10

Y1 - 2008/10

N2 - This article critically examines team and collaborative research as an 'academic mode of production'. Our main argument is that while theoretically qualitative social science research is rooted within a postfoundational epistemological paradigm, normative team-based research practices embody foundational principles. Team research relies on a division of labour that creates divisions and hierarchies of knowledge, particularly between researchers who gather embodied and contextual knowledge 'in the field' and those who produce textual knowledge 'in the office'. We argue that a theoretical commitment to a postfoundational epistemology demands that we translate this into concrete research practices that rely on concerted team-based relations rather than divisions of labour, and a reflexive research practice that strives to involve all team members in all aspects of knowledge construction processes.

AB - This article critically examines team and collaborative research as an 'academic mode of production'. Our main argument is that while theoretically qualitative social science research is rooted within a postfoundational epistemological paradigm, normative team-based research practices embody foundational principles. Team research relies on a division of labour that creates divisions and hierarchies of knowledge, particularly between researchers who gather embodied and contextual knowledge 'in the field' and those who produce textual knowledge 'in the office'. We argue that a theoretical commitment to a postfoundational epistemology demands that we translate this into concrete research practices that rely on concerted team-based relations rather than divisions of labour, and a reflexive research practice that strives to involve all team members in all aspects of knowledge construction processes.

KW - collaboration

KW - contextual knowledge

KW - divisions of knowledge

KW - divisions of labour

KW - embodied knowledge

KW - epistemology

KW - reflexivity

KW - research teams

KW - textual knowledge

KW - qualitative data

U2 - 10.1177/0038038508094574

DO - 10.1177/0038038508094574

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 971

EP - 985

JO - Sociology

JF - Sociology

SN - 0038-0385

IS - 5

ER -