Knowledge protection in firms: A conceptual framework and Evidence from HP Labs

Karen Elliot, Andrea Patacconi (Corresponding Author), Joseph Swierzbinski, Julian Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper proposes a simple framework to examine organizational methods of knowledge protection. The framework highlights a basic trade-off between improving decision-making and innovation through communication and mitigating security risks by imposing restrictions on communication flows. The trade-off is mediated by factors such as the sensitivity of information, the degree to which employees can be trusted to handle sensitive information appropriately, and firms' investments in legal protection mechanisms. Evidence from HP Labs supports the basic predictions of the model, in particular
the importance of employee trustworthiness and internalized codes of behavior in promoting open communication. Our interviews also suggest a potential conflict between two of the most important appropriability mechanisms: secrecy and lead-time advantage.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-193
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Management Review
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date5 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

Knowledge protection
Conceptual framework
Communication
Trade-offs
Employees
Appropriability
Factors
Firm investment
Trustworthiness
Prediction
Secrecy
Decision making
Innovation
Lead time
Legal protection

Keywords

  • Secrecy
  • information security
  • organization design
  • trust
  • innovation
  • appropriability mechanisms
  • APPROPRIABILITY
  • PERFORMANCE
  • RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT
  • INNOVATION
  • TRADE SECRETS
  • COMPETITION
  • PATENTS
  • CONSEQUENCES
  • RELATIONAL CONTRACTS
  • TRUST

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Knowledge protection in firms : A conceptual framework and Evidence from HP Labs. / Elliot, Karen; Patacconi, Andrea (Corresponding Author); Swierzbinski, Joseph; Williams, Julian.

In: European Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2019, p. 179-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Elliot, Karen ; Patacconi, Andrea ; Swierzbinski, Joseph ; Williams, Julian. / Knowledge protection in firms : A conceptual framework and Evidence from HP Labs. In: European Management Review. 2019 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 179-193.
@article{7e87d7d18b184e76a53946d0da8743b2,
title = "Knowledge protection in firms: A conceptual framework and Evidence from HP Labs",
abstract = "This paper proposes a simple framework to examine organizational methods of knowledge protection. The framework highlights a basic trade-off between improving decision-making and innovation through communication and mitigating security risks by imposing restrictions on communication flows. The trade-off is mediated by factors such as the sensitivity of information, the degree to which employees can be trusted to handle sensitive information appropriately, and firms' investments in legal protection mechanisms. Evidence from HP Labs supports the basic predictions of the model, in particularthe importance of employee trustworthiness and internalized codes of behavior in promoting open communication. Our interviews also suggest a potential conflict between two of the most important appropriability mechanisms: secrecy and lead-time advantage.",
keywords = "Secrecy, information security, organization design, trust, innovation, appropriability mechanisms, APPROPRIABILITY, PERFORMANCE, RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT, INNOVATION, TRADE SECRETS, COMPETITION, PATENTS, CONSEQUENCES, RELATIONAL CONTRACTS, TRUST",
author = "Karen Elliot and Andrea Patacconi and Joseph Swierzbinski and Julian Williams",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/emre.12336",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "179--193",
journal = "European Management Review",
issn = "1740-4754",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge protection in firms

T2 - A conceptual framework and Evidence from HP Labs

AU - Elliot, Karen

AU - Patacconi, Andrea

AU - Swierzbinski, Joseph

AU - Williams, Julian

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This paper proposes a simple framework to examine organizational methods of knowledge protection. The framework highlights a basic trade-off between improving decision-making and innovation through communication and mitigating security risks by imposing restrictions on communication flows. The trade-off is mediated by factors such as the sensitivity of information, the degree to which employees can be trusted to handle sensitive information appropriately, and firms' investments in legal protection mechanisms. Evidence from HP Labs supports the basic predictions of the model, in particularthe importance of employee trustworthiness and internalized codes of behavior in promoting open communication. Our interviews also suggest a potential conflict between two of the most important appropriability mechanisms: secrecy and lead-time advantage.

AB - This paper proposes a simple framework to examine organizational methods of knowledge protection. The framework highlights a basic trade-off between improving decision-making and innovation through communication and mitigating security risks by imposing restrictions on communication flows. The trade-off is mediated by factors such as the sensitivity of information, the degree to which employees can be trusted to handle sensitive information appropriately, and firms' investments in legal protection mechanisms. Evidence from HP Labs supports the basic predictions of the model, in particularthe importance of employee trustworthiness and internalized codes of behavior in promoting open communication. Our interviews also suggest a potential conflict between two of the most important appropriability mechanisms: secrecy and lead-time advantage.

KW - Secrecy

KW - information security

KW - organization design

KW - trust

KW - innovation

KW - appropriability mechanisms

KW - APPROPRIABILITY

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT

KW - INNOVATION

KW - TRADE SECRETS

KW - COMPETITION

KW - PATENTS

KW - CONSEQUENCES

KW - RELATIONAL CONTRACTS

KW - TRUST

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057743080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.mendeley.com/research/knowledge-protection-firms-conceptual-framework-evidence-hp-labs

U2 - 10.1111/emre.12336

DO - 10.1111/emre.12336

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 179

EP - 193

JO - European Management Review

JF - European Management Review

SN - 1740-4754

IS - 1

ER -