Knowledge protection in firms: A conceptual framework and Evidence from HP Labs

Karen Elliot, Andrea Patacconi (Corresponding Author), Joseph Swierzbinski, Julian Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper proposes a simple framework to examine organizational methods of knowledge protection. The framework highlights a basic trade-off between improving decision-making and innovation through communication and mitigating security risks by imposing restrictions on communication flows. The trade-off is mediated by factors such as the sensitivity of information, the degree to which employees can be trusted to handle sensitive information appropriately, and firms' investments in legal protection mechanisms. Evidence from HP Labs supports the basic predictions of the model, in particular
the importance of employee trustworthiness and internalized codes of behavior in promoting open communication. Our interviews also suggest a potential conflict between two of the most important appropriability mechanisms: secrecy and lead-time advantage.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-193
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Management Review
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date5 Dec 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Secrecy
  • information security
  • organization design
  • trust
  • innovation
  • appropriability mechanisms
  • APPROPRIABILITY
  • PERFORMANCE
  • RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT
  • INNOVATION
  • TRADE SECRETS
  • COMPETITION
  • PATENTS
  • CONSEQUENCES
  • RELATIONAL CONTRACTS
  • TRUST

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Knowledge protection in firms: A conceptual framework and Evidence from HP Labs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this