Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care

M. S. Jordhøy, Peter Fayers, M. Ahlner-Elmqvist, S. Kaasa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Comprehensive palliative care programs are often implemented on a community level, and to evaluate such interventions, randomization by cluster (community) may be the only feasible method. In trials randomizing individual subjects, the importance of proper concealment has been stressed, In cluster randomized trials, however, concealment of individual patient allocation is often impossible. The following risk of selection bias has been given little attention.

In the present study, comparing palliative care to conventional care, community health care districts were defined as clusters and randomized. The patients' treatment assignment was determined by the allocation of the cluster in which they resided, and hence predictable by their address. A biased selection based on practical considerations related to patients' diagnoses and hospital departments was suspected. To explore this, cancer diagnoses were grouped according to local tradition for sharing of treatment responsibility among hospital departments. A significant difference between trial arms in distribution of these groups was revealed and strongly supported our suspicion. The finding carries an important message to future researchers: when using cluster randomization, any evidence of selection bias should be carefully checked and reported.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-49
Number of pages6
JournalPalliative Medicine
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Keywords

  • cluster randomization
  • concealment
  • palliative care
  • selection bias
  • INTERVENTION TRIALS
  • CANCER-PATIENTS
  • DISEASE
  • DEATH
  • HOME

Cite this

Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care. / Jordhøy, M. S.; Fayers, Peter; Ahlner-Elmqvist, M.; Kaasa, S.

In: Palliative Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, p. 43-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jordhøy, M. S. ; Fayers, Peter ; Ahlner-Elmqvist, M. ; Kaasa, S. / Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care. In: Palliative Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 43-49.
@article{d198e64d74f544ecb8bb465e437135d9,
title = "Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care",
abstract = "Comprehensive palliative care programs are often implemented on a community level, and to evaluate such interventions, randomization by cluster (community) may be the only feasible method. In trials randomizing individual subjects, the importance of proper concealment has been stressed, In cluster randomized trials, however, concealment of individual patient allocation is often impossible. The following risk of selection bias has been given little attention.In the present study, comparing palliative care to conventional care, community health care districts were defined as clusters and randomized. The patients' treatment assignment was determined by the allocation of the cluster in which they resided, and hence predictable by their address. A biased selection based on practical considerations related to patients' diagnoses and hospital departments was suspected. To explore this, cancer diagnoses were grouped according to local tradition for sharing of treatment responsibility among hospital departments. A significant difference between trial arms in distribution of these groups was revealed and strongly supported our suspicion. The finding carries an important message to future researchers: when using cluster randomization, any evidence of selection bias should be carefully checked and reported.",
keywords = "cluster randomization, concealment, palliative care, selection bias, INTERVENTION TRIALS, CANCER-PATIENTS, DISEASE, DEATH, HOME",
author = "Jordh{\o}y, {M. S.} and Peter Fayers and M. Ahlner-Elmqvist and S. Kaasa",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1191/0269216302pm523oa",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "43--49",
journal = "Palliative Medicine",
issn = "0269-2163",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lack of concealment may lead to selection bias in cluster randomized trials of palliative care

AU - Jordhøy, M. S.

AU - Fayers, Peter

AU - Ahlner-Elmqvist, M.

AU - Kaasa, S.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Comprehensive palliative care programs are often implemented on a community level, and to evaluate such interventions, randomization by cluster (community) may be the only feasible method. In trials randomizing individual subjects, the importance of proper concealment has been stressed, In cluster randomized trials, however, concealment of individual patient allocation is often impossible. The following risk of selection bias has been given little attention.In the present study, comparing palliative care to conventional care, community health care districts were defined as clusters and randomized. The patients' treatment assignment was determined by the allocation of the cluster in which they resided, and hence predictable by their address. A biased selection based on practical considerations related to patients' diagnoses and hospital departments was suspected. To explore this, cancer diagnoses were grouped according to local tradition for sharing of treatment responsibility among hospital departments. A significant difference between trial arms in distribution of these groups was revealed and strongly supported our suspicion. The finding carries an important message to future researchers: when using cluster randomization, any evidence of selection bias should be carefully checked and reported.

AB - Comprehensive palliative care programs are often implemented on a community level, and to evaluate such interventions, randomization by cluster (community) may be the only feasible method. In trials randomizing individual subjects, the importance of proper concealment has been stressed, In cluster randomized trials, however, concealment of individual patient allocation is often impossible. The following risk of selection bias has been given little attention.In the present study, comparing palliative care to conventional care, community health care districts were defined as clusters and randomized. The patients' treatment assignment was determined by the allocation of the cluster in which they resided, and hence predictable by their address. A biased selection based on practical considerations related to patients' diagnoses and hospital departments was suspected. To explore this, cancer diagnoses were grouped according to local tradition for sharing of treatment responsibility among hospital departments. A significant difference between trial arms in distribution of these groups was revealed and strongly supported our suspicion. The finding carries an important message to future researchers: when using cluster randomization, any evidence of selection bias should be carefully checked and reported.

KW - cluster randomization

KW - concealment

KW - palliative care

KW - selection bias

KW - INTERVENTION TRIALS

KW - CANCER-PATIENTS

KW - DISEASE

KW - DEATH

KW - HOME

U2 - 10.1191/0269216302pm523oa

DO - 10.1191/0269216302pm523oa

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 43

EP - 49

JO - Palliative Medicine

JF - Palliative Medicine

SN - 0269-2163

IS - 1

ER -