Language delay is not predictable from available risk factors

Philip Wilson, Fiona McQuaige, Lucy Thompson, Alex McConnachie

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Aims. To investigate factors associated with language delay in a cohort of 30-month-old children and determine if identification of language delay requires active contact with families. Methods. Data were collected at a pilot universal 30-month health contact. Health visitors used a simple two-item language screen. Data were obtained for 315 children; language delay was found in 33. The predictive capacity of 13 variables which could realistically be known before the 30-month contact was analysed. Results. Seven variables were significantly associated with language delay in univariate analysis, but in logistic regression only five of these variables remained significant. Conclusion. The presence of one or more risk factors had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 45%, but a positive predictive value of only 15%. The presence of one or more of these risk factors thus can not reliably be used to identify language delayed children, nor is it possible to define an “at risk” population because male gender was the only significant demographic factor and it had an unacceptably low specificity (52.5%). It is not possible to predict which children will have language delay at 30 months. Identification of this important ESSENCE disorder requires direct clinical contact with all families.
Original languageEnglish
Article number947018
Number of pages8
JournalThe Scientific World Journal
Volume2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Language Development Disorders
risk factor
Health
Logistics
Child Language
Community Health Nurses
Language
Logistic Models
Demography
Sensitivity and Specificity
logistics
gender

Keywords

  • language
  • delay

Cite this

Language delay is not predictable from available risk factors. / Wilson, Philip; McQuaige, Fiona; Thompson, Lucy; McConnachie, Alex.

In: The Scientific World Journal, Vol. 2013, 947018, 2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2498ebc2bed142ea8bbd4d162f8139b3,
title = "Language delay is not predictable from available risk factors",
abstract = "Aims. To investigate factors associated with language delay in a cohort of 30-month-old children and determine if identification of language delay requires active contact with families. Methods. Data were collected at a pilot universal 30-month health contact. Health visitors used a simple two-item language screen. Data were obtained for 315 children; language delay was found in 33. The predictive capacity of 13 variables which could realistically be known before the 30-month contact was analysed. Results. Seven variables were significantly associated with language delay in univariate analysis, but in logistic regression only five of these variables remained significant. Conclusion. The presence of one or more risk factors had a sensitivity of 89{\%} and specificity of 45{\%}, but a positive predictive value of only 15{\%}. The presence of one or more of these risk factors thus can not reliably be used to identify language delayed children, nor is it possible to define an “at risk” population because male gender was the only significant demographic factor and it had an unacceptably low specificity (52.5{\%}). It is not possible to predict which children will have language delay at 30 months. Identification of this important ESSENCE disorder requires direct clinical contact with all families.",
keywords = "language, delay",
author = "Philip Wilson and Fiona McQuaige and Lucy Thompson and Alex McConnachie",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1155/2013/947018",
language = "English",
volume = "2013",
journal = "The Scientific World Journal",
issn = "1537-744X",
publisher = "Hindawi Publishing Corporation",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Language delay is not predictable from available risk factors

AU - Wilson, Philip

AU - McQuaige, Fiona

AU - Thompson, Lucy

AU - McConnachie, Alex

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Aims. To investigate factors associated with language delay in a cohort of 30-month-old children and determine if identification of language delay requires active contact with families. Methods. Data were collected at a pilot universal 30-month health contact. Health visitors used a simple two-item language screen. Data were obtained for 315 children; language delay was found in 33. The predictive capacity of 13 variables which could realistically be known before the 30-month contact was analysed. Results. Seven variables were significantly associated with language delay in univariate analysis, but in logistic regression only five of these variables remained significant. Conclusion. The presence of one or more risk factors had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 45%, but a positive predictive value of only 15%. The presence of one or more of these risk factors thus can not reliably be used to identify language delayed children, nor is it possible to define an “at risk” population because male gender was the only significant demographic factor and it had an unacceptably low specificity (52.5%). It is not possible to predict which children will have language delay at 30 months. Identification of this important ESSENCE disorder requires direct clinical contact with all families.

AB - Aims. To investigate factors associated with language delay in a cohort of 30-month-old children and determine if identification of language delay requires active contact with families. Methods. Data were collected at a pilot universal 30-month health contact. Health visitors used a simple two-item language screen. Data were obtained for 315 children; language delay was found in 33. The predictive capacity of 13 variables which could realistically be known before the 30-month contact was analysed. Results. Seven variables were significantly associated with language delay in univariate analysis, but in logistic regression only five of these variables remained significant. Conclusion. The presence of one or more risk factors had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 45%, but a positive predictive value of only 15%. The presence of one or more of these risk factors thus can not reliably be used to identify language delayed children, nor is it possible to define an “at risk” population because male gender was the only significant demographic factor and it had an unacceptably low specificity (52.5%). It is not possible to predict which children will have language delay at 30 months. Identification of this important ESSENCE disorder requires direct clinical contact with all families.

KW - language

KW - delay

U2 - 10.1155/2013/947018

DO - 10.1155/2013/947018

M3 - Article

VL - 2013

JO - The Scientific World Journal

JF - The Scientific World Journal

SN - 1537-744X

M1 - 947018

ER -