LD and the rise of highly gifted and talented programs: examining similar rationales across decades and designations

Kathryn S Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Sleeter's 1987 article "Why is there Learning Disabilities?" provides an analytical template for examining the rise in discourse surrounding Highly Gifted and Talented (HGT) programs in the past ten years. This article begins with an historical and policy account of the local context that supported the rise of HGT. Then it highlights three key rationales from Sleeter's paper to demonstrate how the discourse related to supporting the rise of LD is reconstituted into the discourse related to supporting the rise of HGT. These discourses are analyzed using critical discourse analysis to demonstrate how the rhetoric for LD and HGT maintains race and class stratification in the public school system. This article finishes with an example of one school with an HGT program that believes students can have their needs met without separating them.
Original languageEnglish
JournalDisability Studies Quarterly
Volume30
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

discourse
school system
learning disability
discourse analysis
rhetoric
school
student

Cite this

LD and the rise of highly gifted and talented programs : examining similar rationales across decades and designations. / Young, Kathryn S.

In: Disability Studies Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{47a966f4d33d4dd28ceba7eea6572a85,
title = "LD and the rise of highly gifted and talented programs: examining similar rationales across decades and designations",
abstract = "Sleeter's 1987 article {"}Why is there Learning Disabilities?{"} provides an analytical template for examining the rise in discourse surrounding Highly Gifted and Talented (HGT) programs in the past ten years. This article begins with an historical and policy account of the local context that supported the rise of HGT. Then it highlights three key rationales from Sleeter's paper to demonstrate how the discourse related to supporting the rise of LD is reconstituted into the discourse related to supporting the rise of HGT. These discourses are analyzed using critical discourse analysis to demonstrate how the rhetoric for LD and HGT maintains race and class stratification in the public school system. This article finishes with an example of one school with an HGT program that believes students can have their needs met without separating them.",
author = "Young, {Kathryn S}",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
journal = "Disability Studies Quarterly",
issn = "1041-5718",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - LD and the rise of highly gifted and talented programs

T2 - examining similar rationales across decades and designations

AU - Young, Kathryn S

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Sleeter's 1987 article "Why is there Learning Disabilities?" provides an analytical template for examining the rise in discourse surrounding Highly Gifted and Talented (HGT) programs in the past ten years. This article begins with an historical and policy account of the local context that supported the rise of HGT. Then it highlights three key rationales from Sleeter's paper to demonstrate how the discourse related to supporting the rise of LD is reconstituted into the discourse related to supporting the rise of HGT. These discourses are analyzed using critical discourse analysis to demonstrate how the rhetoric for LD and HGT maintains race and class stratification in the public school system. This article finishes with an example of one school with an HGT program that believes students can have their needs met without separating them.

AB - Sleeter's 1987 article "Why is there Learning Disabilities?" provides an analytical template for examining the rise in discourse surrounding Highly Gifted and Talented (HGT) programs in the past ten years. This article begins with an historical and policy account of the local context that supported the rise of HGT. Then it highlights three key rationales from Sleeter's paper to demonstrate how the discourse related to supporting the rise of LD is reconstituted into the discourse related to supporting the rise of HGT. These discourses are analyzed using critical discourse analysis to demonstrate how the rhetoric for LD and HGT maintains race and class stratification in the public school system. This article finishes with an example of one school with an HGT program that believes students can have their needs met without separating them.

M3 - Article

VL - 30

JO - Disability Studies Quarterly

JF - Disability Studies Quarterly

SN - 1041-5718

IS - 2

ER -