Learning and Re-learning Regime Support: the Dynamics of Post-Communist Regimes

Richard Rose, W. Mischler

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    76 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The political support of citizens of new democracies reflects two sets of experiences. Initially, people are socialized into an undemocratic regime; then, they must re-learn political support in relation to a new regime. In an established democracy, it is difficult to disentangle the effect of early socialization and current performance because both refer to the same regime. However, this is both possible and necessary in countries where there has been a change in regime. Critical questions then arise: When, whether and how do citizens determine their support for their new regime? At the start of a new regime past socialization should be more important but, after a few years, current performance should become more important. We draw on 47 Barometer surveys between 1991 and 1998 in ten more or less democratic post-communist regimes of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union to test the relative importance of early socialization influences, the legacy of the communist past, and the political and economic performance of new regimes. We find that economic and political performance explains the most variance in support and, secondarily, the communist legacy. Early socialization is insignificant. However, contrary to economic theories of voting, the impact of political performance is greater than the impact of economic performance in post-communist countries-and its impact is increasing.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)5-36
    Number of pages31
    JournalEuropean Journal of Political Research
    Volume41
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Keywords

    • POLITICAL DEMOCRACY
    • ECONOMIC-GROWTH
    • CULTURE
    • RUSSIA

    Cite this

    Learning and Re-learning Regime Support: the Dynamics of Post-Communist Regimes. / Rose, Richard; Mischler, W.

    In: European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2002, p. 5-36.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{7266a79037c4473ca3b9da330238b1e4,
    title = "Learning and Re-learning Regime Support: the Dynamics of Post-Communist Regimes",
    abstract = "The political support of citizens of new democracies reflects two sets of experiences. Initially, people are socialized into an undemocratic regime; then, they must re-learn political support in relation to a new regime. In an established democracy, it is difficult to disentangle the effect of early socialization and current performance because both refer to the same regime. However, this is both possible and necessary in countries where there has been a change in regime. Critical questions then arise: When, whether and how do citizens determine their support for their new regime? At the start of a new regime past socialization should be more important but, after a few years, current performance should become more important. We draw on 47 Barometer surveys between 1991 and 1998 in ten more or less democratic post-communist regimes of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union to test the relative importance of early socialization influences, the legacy of the communist past, and the political and economic performance of new regimes. We find that economic and political performance explains the most variance in support and, secondarily, the communist legacy. Early socialization is insignificant. However, contrary to economic theories of voting, the impact of political performance is greater than the impact of economic performance in post-communist countries-and its impact is increasing.",
    keywords = "POLITICAL DEMOCRACY, ECONOMIC-GROWTH, CULTURE, RUSSIA",
    author = "Richard Rose and W. Mischler",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1111/1475-6765.00002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "41",
    pages = "5--36",
    journal = "European Journal of Political Research",
    issn = "0304-4130",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Learning and Re-learning Regime Support: the Dynamics of Post-Communist Regimes

    AU - Rose, Richard

    AU - Mischler, W.

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - The political support of citizens of new democracies reflects two sets of experiences. Initially, people are socialized into an undemocratic regime; then, they must re-learn political support in relation to a new regime. In an established democracy, it is difficult to disentangle the effect of early socialization and current performance because both refer to the same regime. However, this is both possible and necessary in countries where there has been a change in regime. Critical questions then arise: When, whether and how do citizens determine their support for their new regime? At the start of a new regime past socialization should be more important but, after a few years, current performance should become more important. We draw on 47 Barometer surveys between 1991 and 1998 in ten more or less democratic post-communist regimes of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union to test the relative importance of early socialization influences, the legacy of the communist past, and the political and economic performance of new regimes. We find that economic and political performance explains the most variance in support and, secondarily, the communist legacy. Early socialization is insignificant. However, contrary to economic theories of voting, the impact of political performance is greater than the impact of economic performance in post-communist countries-and its impact is increasing.

    AB - The political support of citizens of new democracies reflects two sets of experiences. Initially, people are socialized into an undemocratic regime; then, they must re-learn political support in relation to a new regime. In an established democracy, it is difficult to disentangle the effect of early socialization and current performance because both refer to the same regime. However, this is both possible and necessary in countries where there has been a change in regime. Critical questions then arise: When, whether and how do citizens determine their support for their new regime? At the start of a new regime past socialization should be more important but, after a few years, current performance should become more important. We draw on 47 Barometer surveys between 1991 and 1998 in ten more or less democratic post-communist regimes of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union to test the relative importance of early socialization influences, the legacy of the communist past, and the political and economic performance of new regimes. We find that economic and political performance explains the most variance in support and, secondarily, the communist legacy. Early socialization is insignificant. However, contrary to economic theories of voting, the impact of political performance is greater than the impact of economic performance in post-communist countries-and its impact is increasing.

    KW - POLITICAL DEMOCRACY

    KW - ECONOMIC-GROWTH

    KW - CULTURE

    KW - RUSSIA

    U2 - 10.1111/1475-6765.00002

    DO - 10.1111/1475-6765.00002

    M3 - Article

    VL - 41

    SP - 5

    EP - 36

    JO - European Journal of Political Research

    JF - European Journal of Political Research

    SN - 0304-4130

    IS - 1

    ER -