TY - JOUR
T1 - Legal issues in governing genetic biobanks
T2 - the Italian framework as a case study for the implications for citizen’s health through public-private initiatives
AU - Piciocchi, Cinzia
AU - Ducato, Rossana
AU - Martinelli, Lucia
AU - Perra, Silvia
AU - Tomasi, Marta
AU - Zuddas, Carla
AU - Mascalzoni, Deborah
N1 - Deborah Mascalzoni is funded by RD-Connect under grant agreement number 30544.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - This paper outlines some of the challenges faced by regulation of genetic biobanking, using case studies coming from the Italian legal system. The governance of genetic resources in the context of genetic biobanks in Italy is discussed, as an example of the stratification of different inputs and rules: EU law, national law, orders made by authorities and soft law, which need to be integrated with ethical principles, technological strategies and solutions. After providing an overview of the Italian legal regulation of genetic data processing, it considers the fate of genetic material and IP rights in the event of a biobank’s insolvency. To this end, it analyses two case studies: a controversial bankruptcy case which occurred in Sardinia, one of the first examples of private and public partnership biobanks. Another case study considered is the Chris project: an example of partnership between a research institute in Bolzano and the South Tyrolean Health System. Both cases seem to point in the same direction, suggesting expediency of promoting and improving public-private partnerships to manage biological tissues and biotrust to conciliate patent law and public interest.
AB - This paper outlines some of the challenges faced by regulation of genetic biobanking, using case studies coming from the Italian legal system. The governance of genetic resources in the context of genetic biobanks in Italy is discussed, as an example of the stratification of different inputs and rules: EU law, national law, orders made by authorities and soft law, which need to be integrated with ethical principles, technological strategies and solutions. After providing an overview of the Italian legal regulation of genetic data processing, it considers the fate of genetic material and IP rights in the event of a biobank’s insolvency. To this end, it analyses two case studies: a controversial bankruptcy case which occurred in Sardinia, one of the first examples of private and public partnership biobanks. Another case study considered is the Chris project: an example of partnership between a research institute in Bolzano and the South Tyrolean Health System. Both cases seem to point in the same direction, suggesting expediency of promoting and improving public-private partnerships to manage biological tissues and biotrust to conciliate patent law and public interest.
KW - Bankruptcy
KW - Biobanking
KW - Data protection
KW - Gene patent
KW - General Data Protection Regulation
KW - Genetic data
KW - Informed consent
KW - Italian law
KW - Privacy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029605741&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12687-017-0328-2
DO - 10.1007/s12687-017-0328-2
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029605741
VL - 9
SP - 177
EP - 190
JO - Journal of Community Genetics
JF - Journal of Community Genetics
SN - 1868-6001
ER -