Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter looks at international soft law against the background of broader issues about the normativity of law. It explores the ways in which “institutional normativity” operates across legal systems with special focus on the relationship between different constructs of validity. The chapter develops a narrowly defined “core” concept of validity that reflects the minimum conditions for providing effective normative guidance in institutional settings. This concept revolves around the idea that validity establishes a mediated relationship between the legitimacy of law and the internal processes of legal practices. The chapter argues that more specific constructs of validity are political constructs that reflect the concrete political and institutional dynamics of particular legal practices. This point about the coexistence of different constructs of legality and legal validity is demonstrated by an analysis of the relationship between international law and modern state law. The chapter characterise the proliferation of international soft law as one manifestation of the tensions that this coexistence brings about. The growing volume and significance of international soft law has a lot to do with a constraining model of legality in domestic legal systems which have a spillover effect on international law. Soft law often needs to fill normative spaces that have been made hard to access for hard international law. For a more concrete analysis, issues about international soft law in the field of human rights law are picked out. Using the General Comments of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as an example, the chapter looks at the legitimacy problems that the proliferation of soft law generates.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationLegal Validity and Soft Law
EditorsPauline Westerman, Jaap Hage, Stephan Kirste, Anne Ruth Mackor
Place of PublicationCham
PublisherSpringer
Pages221-242
Number of pages22
ISBN (Electronic)9783319775227
ISBN (Print)9783319775210
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameLaw and Philosophy Library
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Volume122
ISSN (Print)1572-4395

Fingerprint

legal validity
international law
human rights
Law
normativity
legal usage
legality
coexistence
legal system
proliferation
legitimacy
state law
UNO

Keywords

  • international soft law
  • normative guidance
  • institutional normativity
  • formal validity
  • ascertainment of law
  • legitimacy
  • state law
  • human rights law
  • standard instruments

Cite this

Bodig, M. (2018). Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law. In P. Westerman, J. Hage, S. Kirste, & A. R. Mackor (Eds.), Legal Validity and Soft Law (pp. 221-242). (Law and Philosophy Library; Vol. 122). Cham: Springer . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_12

Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law. / Bodig, Matyas.

Legal Validity and Soft Law. ed. / Pauline Westerman; Jaap Hage; Stephan Kirste; Anne Ruth Mackor. Cham : Springer , 2018. p. 221-242 (Law and Philosophy Library; Vol. 122).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bodig, M 2018, Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law. in P Westerman, J Hage, S Kirste & AR Mackor (eds), Legal Validity and Soft Law. Law and Philosophy Library, vol. 122, Springer , Cham, pp. 221-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_12
Bodig M. Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law. In Westerman P, Hage J, Kirste S, Mackor AR, editors, Legal Validity and Soft Law. Cham: Springer . 2018. p. 221-242. (Law and Philosophy Library). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_12
Bodig, Matyas. / Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law. Legal Validity and Soft Law. editor / Pauline Westerman ; Jaap Hage ; Stephan Kirste ; Anne Ruth Mackor. Cham : Springer , 2018. pp. 221-242 (Law and Philosophy Library).
@inbook{c39c826160f14f64bb2acd4cced7b399,
title = "Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law",
abstract = "This chapter looks at international soft law against the background of broader issues about the normativity of law. It explores the ways in which “institutional normativity” operates across legal systems with special focus on the relationship between different constructs of validity. The chapter develops a narrowly defined “core” concept of validity that reflects the minimum conditions for providing effective normative guidance in institutional settings. This concept revolves around the idea that validity establishes a mediated relationship between the legitimacy of law and the internal processes of legal practices. The chapter argues that more specific constructs of validity are political constructs that reflect the concrete political and institutional dynamics of particular legal practices. This point about the coexistence of different constructs of legality and legal validity is demonstrated by an analysis of the relationship between international law and modern state law. The chapter characterise the proliferation of international soft law as one manifestation of the tensions that this coexistence brings about. The growing volume and significance of international soft law has a lot to do with a constraining model of legality in domestic legal systems which have a spillover effect on international law. Soft law often needs to fill normative spaces that have been made hard to access for hard international law. For a more concrete analysis, issues about international soft law in the field of human rights law are picked out. Using the General Comments of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as an example, the chapter looks at the legitimacy problems that the proliferation of soft law generates.",
keywords = "international soft law, normative guidance, institutional normativity, formal validity, ascertainment of law, legitimacy , state law, human rights law, standard instruments",
author = "Matyas Bodig",
note = "I am grateful for useful comments from the participants in the Groningen Workshop and subsequent research seminars held in Aberdeen and Debrecen where earlier versions of this chapter were presented. I am particularly thankful to M{\'a}ty{\'a}s Bencze, Irene Couzigou, Tam{\'a}s Győrfi, Tam{\'a}s Hoffmann, Andrei Marmor, Paolo Sandro, Robert Taylor, Dietmar von der Pfordten, and Zsolt Ződi. I am also grateful for the anonymous reviewer’s comments on my chapter.",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_12",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319775210",
series = "Law and Philosophy Library",
publisher = "Springer",
pages = "221--242",
editor = "Pauline Westerman and Jaap Hage and Stephan Kirste and Mackor, {Anne Ruth}",
booktitle = "Legal Validity and Soft Law",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law

AU - Bodig, Matyas

N1 - I am grateful for useful comments from the participants in the Groningen Workshop and subsequent research seminars held in Aberdeen and Debrecen where earlier versions of this chapter were presented. I am particularly thankful to Mátyás Bencze, Irene Couzigou, Tamás Győrfi, Tamás Hoffmann, Andrei Marmor, Paolo Sandro, Robert Taylor, Dietmar von der Pfordten, and Zsolt Ződi. I am also grateful for the anonymous reviewer’s comments on my chapter.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This chapter looks at international soft law against the background of broader issues about the normativity of law. It explores the ways in which “institutional normativity” operates across legal systems with special focus on the relationship between different constructs of validity. The chapter develops a narrowly defined “core” concept of validity that reflects the minimum conditions for providing effective normative guidance in institutional settings. This concept revolves around the idea that validity establishes a mediated relationship between the legitimacy of law and the internal processes of legal practices. The chapter argues that more specific constructs of validity are political constructs that reflect the concrete political and institutional dynamics of particular legal practices. This point about the coexistence of different constructs of legality and legal validity is demonstrated by an analysis of the relationship between international law and modern state law. The chapter characterise the proliferation of international soft law as one manifestation of the tensions that this coexistence brings about. The growing volume and significance of international soft law has a lot to do with a constraining model of legality in domestic legal systems which have a spillover effect on international law. Soft law often needs to fill normative spaces that have been made hard to access for hard international law. For a more concrete analysis, issues about international soft law in the field of human rights law are picked out. Using the General Comments of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as an example, the chapter looks at the legitimacy problems that the proliferation of soft law generates.

AB - This chapter looks at international soft law against the background of broader issues about the normativity of law. It explores the ways in which “institutional normativity” operates across legal systems with special focus on the relationship between different constructs of validity. The chapter develops a narrowly defined “core” concept of validity that reflects the minimum conditions for providing effective normative guidance in institutional settings. This concept revolves around the idea that validity establishes a mediated relationship between the legitimacy of law and the internal processes of legal practices. The chapter argues that more specific constructs of validity are political constructs that reflect the concrete political and institutional dynamics of particular legal practices. This point about the coexistence of different constructs of legality and legal validity is demonstrated by an analysis of the relationship between international law and modern state law. The chapter characterise the proliferation of international soft law as one manifestation of the tensions that this coexistence brings about. The growing volume and significance of international soft law has a lot to do with a constraining model of legality in domestic legal systems which have a spillover effect on international law. Soft law often needs to fill normative spaces that have been made hard to access for hard international law. For a more concrete analysis, issues about international soft law in the field of human rights law are picked out. Using the General Comments of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as an example, the chapter looks at the legitimacy problems that the proliferation of soft law generates.

KW - international soft law

KW - normative guidance

KW - institutional normativity

KW - formal validity

KW - ascertainment of law

KW - legitimacy

KW - state law

KW - human rights law

KW - standard instruments

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_12

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-77522-7_12

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9783319775210

T3 - Law and Philosophy Library

SP - 221

EP - 242

BT - Legal Validity and Soft Law

A2 - Westerman, Pauline

A2 - Hage, Jaap

A2 - Kirste, Stephan

A2 - Mackor, Anne Ruth

PB - Springer

CY - Cham

ER -