Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation?

Structural generalizations from idiom production

Agnieszka E. Konopka, Kathryn Bock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To compare abstract structural and lexicalist accounts of syntactic processes in sentence formulation, we examined the effectiveness of nonidiomatic and idiomatic phrasal verbs in inducing structural generalizations. Three experiments made use of a syntactic priming paradigm in which participants recalled sentences they had read in rapid serial visual presentation. Prime and target sentences contained phrasal verbs with particles directly following the verb (pull off a sweatshirt) or following the direct object (pull a sweatshirt off). Idiomatic primes used verbs whose figurative meaning cannot be straightforwardly derived from the literal meaning of the main verb (e.g., pull off a robbery) and are commonly treated as stored lexical units. Particle placement in sentences was primed by both nonidiomatic and idiomatic verbs. Experiment 1 showed that the syntax of idiomatic and nonidiomatic phrasal verbs is amenable to priming, and Experiments 2 and 3 compared the priming patterns created by idiomatic and nonidiomatic primes. Despite differences in idiomaticity and structural flexibility, both types of phrasal verbs induced structural generalizations and differed little in their ability to do so. The findings are interpreted in terms of the role of abstract structural processes in language production.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)68-101
Number of pages34
JournalCognitive Psychology
Volume58
Issue number1
Early online date21 Jul 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Language

Keywords

  • language production
  • syntax
  • idioms

Cite this

Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. / Konopka, Agnieszka E.; Bock, Kathryn.

In: Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 58, No. 1, 02.2009, p. 68-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99297fd2318340659513766180e622aa,
title = "Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation?: Structural generalizations from idiom production",
abstract = "To compare abstract structural and lexicalist accounts of syntactic processes in sentence formulation, we examined the effectiveness of nonidiomatic and idiomatic phrasal verbs in inducing structural generalizations. Three experiments made use of a syntactic priming paradigm in which participants recalled sentences they had read in rapid serial visual presentation. Prime and target sentences contained phrasal verbs with particles directly following the verb (pull off a sweatshirt) or following the direct object (pull a sweatshirt off). Idiomatic primes used verbs whose figurative meaning cannot be straightforwardly derived from the literal meaning of the main verb (e.g., pull off a robbery) and are commonly treated as stored lexical units. Particle placement in sentences was primed by both nonidiomatic and idiomatic verbs. Experiment 1 showed that the syntax of idiomatic and nonidiomatic phrasal verbs is amenable to priming, and Experiments 2 and 3 compared the priming patterns created by idiomatic and nonidiomatic primes. Despite differences in idiomaticity and structural flexibility, both types of phrasal verbs induced structural generalizations and differed little in their ability to do so. The findings are interpreted in terms of the role of abstract structural processes in language production.",
keywords = "language production, syntax, idioms",
author = "Konopka, {Agnieszka E.} and Kathryn Bock",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.002",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "68--101",
journal = "Cognitive Psychology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation?

T2 - Structural generalizations from idiom production

AU - Konopka, Agnieszka E.

AU - Bock, Kathryn

PY - 2009/2

Y1 - 2009/2

N2 - To compare abstract structural and lexicalist accounts of syntactic processes in sentence formulation, we examined the effectiveness of nonidiomatic and idiomatic phrasal verbs in inducing structural generalizations. Three experiments made use of a syntactic priming paradigm in which participants recalled sentences they had read in rapid serial visual presentation. Prime and target sentences contained phrasal verbs with particles directly following the verb (pull off a sweatshirt) or following the direct object (pull a sweatshirt off). Idiomatic primes used verbs whose figurative meaning cannot be straightforwardly derived from the literal meaning of the main verb (e.g., pull off a robbery) and are commonly treated as stored lexical units. Particle placement in sentences was primed by both nonidiomatic and idiomatic verbs. Experiment 1 showed that the syntax of idiomatic and nonidiomatic phrasal verbs is amenable to priming, and Experiments 2 and 3 compared the priming patterns created by idiomatic and nonidiomatic primes. Despite differences in idiomaticity and structural flexibility, both types of phrasal verbs induced structural generalizations and differed little in their ability to do so. The findings are interpreted in terms of the role of abstract structural processes in language production.

AB - To compare abstract structural and lexicalist accounts of syntactic processes in sentence formulation, we examined the effectiveness of nonidiomatic and idiomatic phrasal verbs in inducing structural generalizations. Three experiments made use of a syntactic priming paradigm in which participants recalled sentences they had read in rapid serial visual presentation. Prime and target sentences contained phrasal verbs with particles directly following the verb (pull off a sweatshirt) or following the direct object (pull a sweatshirt off). Idiomatic primes used verbs whose figurative meaning cannot be straightforwardly derived from the literal meaning of the main verb (e.g., pull off a robbery) and are commonly treated as stored lexical units. Particle placement in sentences was primed by both nonidiomatic and idiomatic verbs. Experiment 1 showed that the syntax of idiomatic and nonidiomatic phrasal verbs is amenable to priming, and Experiments 2 and 3 compared the priming patterns created by idiomatic and nonidiomatic primes. Despite differences in idiomaticity and structural flexibility, both types of phrasal verbs induced structural generalizations and differed little in their ability to do so. The findings are interpreted in terms of the role of abstract structural processes in language production.

KW - language production

KW - syntax

KW - idioms

U2 - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 68

EP - 101

JO - Cognitive Psychology

JF - Cognitive Psychology

IS - 1

ER -