Lexico-Grammatical Portraits of Vulnerable Women in War

The 1641 Depositions

Nicci MacLeod, Barbara A. Fennell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The collection of documents that has come to be known as the 1641 Depositions are testimonies collected from (mainly Protestant) witnesses documenting their experiences of the Irish uprising that began in October 1641. As news spread across Protestant Europe of the events unfolding in Ireland, reports and images of violence against women in particular became central to the ideological construction of the barbarism of the Catholic rebels (McAreavey, 2010). Against a backdrop of women’s subordination and firmly defined gender roles (Fletcher, 1995), this article investigates the discursive representation of women in the Depositions, creating what we have termed lexical portraits of particular categories of woman. Distinctions of particular interest are those made on the basis of religion and/or ethnicity, marital status, and the extent to which an individual or group can be viewed as vulnerable. As a corollary to this, the article also investigates the ways in which the representation of women’s involvement in reported events contrasts with that of men. In line with other research dealing with discursive constructions in 17th century texts (e.g., Prentice & Hardie, 2009), a corpus-assisted discourse analytical approach is taken. Adopting the assumptions of Critical Discourse Analysis as outlined by van Dijk (1991; 1996) and Fairclough (1992), and drawing on van Leeuwen’s (1996) framework for analysing the representation of social actors, the lexical patterning of selected terms relating to women and their role in events is scrutinised using a corpus-based methodology. The discussion is extended to what the findings tell us about representations of the roles women in the reported events specifically, and in atrocity propaganda more generally.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-290
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Historical Pragmatics
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2012

Fingerprint

event
barbarism
women's role
social actor
propaganda
marital status
gender role
testimony
discourse analysis
witness
Ireland
Deposition
news
ethnicity
Religion
violence
discourse
methodology
experience
Group

Keywords

  • 1641 depositions
  • critical discourse analysis
  • corpus
  • lexico-grammatical portraits
  • representation
  • women

Cite this

Lexico-Grammatical Portraits of Vulnerable Women in War : The 1641 Depositions. / MacLeod, Nicci; Fennell, Barbara A.

In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 01.01.2012, p. 259-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacLeod, Nicci ; Fennell, Barbara A. / Lexico-Grammatical Portraits of Vulnerable Women in War : The 1641 Depositions. In: Journal of Historical Pragmatics. 2012 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 259-290.
@article{dae67c10e478455c84e30489ebc5df81,
title = "Lexico-Grammatical Portraits of Vulnerable Women in War: The 1641 Depositions",
abstract = "The collection of documents that has come to be known as the 1641 Depositions are testimonies collected from (mainly Protestant) witnesses documenting their experiences of the Irish uprising that began in October 1641. As news spread across Protestant Europe of the events unfolding in Ireland, reports and images of violence against women in particular became central to the ideological construction of the barbarism of the Catholic rebels (McAreavey, 2010). Against a backdrop of women’s subordination and firmly defined gender roles (Fletcher, 1995), this article investigates the discursive representation of women in the Depositions, creating what we have termed lexical portraits of particular categories of woman. Distinctions of particular interest are those made on the basis of religion and/or ethnicity, marital status, and the extent to which an individual or group can be viewed as vulnerable. As a corollary to this, the article also investigates the ways in which the representation of women’s involvement in reported events contrasts with that of men. In line with other research dealing with discursive constructions in 17th century texts (e.g., Prentice & Hardie, 2009), a corpus-assisted discourse analytical approach is taken. Adopting the assumptions of Critical Discourse Analysis as outlined by van Dijk (1991; 1996) and Fairclough (1992), and drawing on van Leeuwen’s (1996) framework for analysing the representation of social actors, the lexical patterning of selected terms relating to women and their role in events is scrutinised using a corpus-based methodology. The discussion is extended to what the findings tell us about representations of the roles women in the reported events specifically, and in atrocity propaganda more generally.",
keywords = "1641 depositions, critical discourse analysis, corpus, lexico-grammatical portraits, representation, women",
author = "Nicci MacLeod and Fennell, {Barbara A.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1075/jhp.13.2.04mac",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "259--290",
journal = "Journal of Historical Pragmatics",
issn = "1566-5852",
publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing Company",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lexico-Grammatical Portraits of Vulnerable Women in War

T2 - The 1641 Depositions

AU - MacLeod, Nicci

AU - Fennell, Barbara A.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - The collection of documents that has come to be known as the 1641 Depositions are testimonies collected from (mainly Protestant) witnesses documenting their experiences of the Irish uprising that began in October 1641. As news spread across Protestant Europe of the events unfolding in Ireland, reports and images of violence against women in particular became central to the ideological construction of the barbarism of the Catholic rebels (McAreavey, 2010). Against a backdrop of women’s subordination and firmly defined gender roles (Fletcher, 1995), this article investigates the discursive representation of women in the Depositions, creating what we have termed lexical portraits of particular categories of woman. Distinctions of particular interest are those made on the basis of religion and/or ethnicity, marital status, and the extent to which an individual or group can be viewed as vulnerable. As a corollary to this, the article also investigates the ways in which the representation of women’s involvement in reported events contrasts with that of men. In line with other research dealing with discursive constructions in 17th century texts (e.g., Prentice & Hardie, 2009), a corpus-assisted discourse analytical approach is taken. Adopting the assumptions of Critical Discourse Analysis as outlined by van Dijk (1991; 1996) and Fairclough (1992), and drawing on van Leeuwen’s (1996) framework for analysing the representation of social actors, the lexical patterning of selected terms relating to women and their role in events is scrutinised using a corpus-based methodology. The discussion is extended to what the findings tell us about representations of the roles women in the reported events specifically, and in atrocity propaganda more generally.

AB - The collection of documents that has come to be known as the 1641 Depositions are testimonies collected from (mainly Protestant) witnesses documenting their experiences of the Irish uprising that began in October 1641. As news spread across Protestant Europe of the events unfolding in Ireland, reports and images of violence against women in particular became central to the ideological construction of the barbarism of the Catholic rebels (McAreavey, 2010). Against a backdrop of women’s subordination and firmly defined gender roles (Fletcher, 1995), this article investigates the discursive representation of women in the Depositions, creating what we have termed lexical portraits of particular categories of woman. Distinctions of particular interest are those made on the basis of religion and/or ethnicity, marital status, and the extent to which an individual or group can be viewed as vulnerable. As a corollary to this, the article also investigates the ways in which the representation of women’s involvement in reported events contrasts with that of men. In line with other research dealing with discursive constructions in 17th century texts (e.g., Prentice & Hardie, 2009), a corpus-assisted discourse analytical approach is taken. Adopting the assumptions of Critical Discourse Analysis as outlined by van Dijk (1991; 1996) and Fairclough (1992), and drawing on van Leeuwen’s (1996) framework for analysing the representation of social actors, the lexical patterning of selected terms relating to women and their role in events is scrutinised using a corpus-based methodology. The discussion is extended to what the findings tell us about representations of the roles women in the reported events specifically, and in atrocity propaganda more generally.

KW - 1641 depositions

KW - critical discourse analysis

KW - corpus

KW - lexico-grammatical portraits

KW - representation

KW - women

U2 - 10.1075/jhp.13.2.04mac

DO - 10.1075/jhp.13.2.04mac

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 259

EP - 290

JO - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

JF - Journal of Historical Pragmatics

SN - 1566-5852

IS - 2

ER -