Limits to sustained energy intake. XIII. Recent progress and future perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)


Several theories have been proposed to explain limits on the maximum rate at which animals can ingest and expend energy. These limits are likely to be intrinsic to the animal, and potentially include the capacity of the alimentary tract to assimilate energy - the 'central limitation' hypothesis. Experimental evidence from lactating mice exposed to different ambient temperatures allows us to reject this and similar ideas. Two alternative ideas have been proposed. The 'peripheral limitation' hypothesis suggests that the maximal sustained energy intake reflects the summed demands of individual tissues, which have their own intrinsic limitations on capacity. In contrast, the 'heat dissipation limit' (HDL) theory suggests that animals are constrained by the maximal capacity to dissipate body heat. Abundant evidence in domesticated livestock supports the HDL theory, but data from smaller mammals are less conclusive. Here, we develop a novel framework showing how the HDL and peripheral limitations are likely to be important in all animals, but to different extents. The HDL theory makes a number of predictions - in particular that there is no fixed limit on sustained energy expenditure as a multiple of basal metabolic rate, but rather that the maximum sustained scope is positively correlated with the capacity to dissipate heat.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)230-241
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Experimental Biology
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011


  • Central limitation
  • Heat dissipation limit theory
  • Heat transfer
  • Lactation
  • Metabolic theory of ecology
  • Milk production
  • Peripheral limitation
  • Sustained energy expenditure
  • Sustained metabolic scope


Dive into the research topics of 'Limits to sustained energy intake. XIII. Recent progress and future perspectives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this