TY - JOUR
T1 - Lingering expectations
T2 - A pseudo-repetition effect for words previously expected but not presented
AU - Rommers, Joost
AU - Federmeier, Kara D.
N1 - Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a James S. McDonnell Foundation Scholar Award and NIH grant AG026308 to KDF, and NWO grant 275-89-032 to JR. We thank Vivek Dave for assistance during data collection.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Prediction can help support rapid language processing. However, it is unclear whether prediction has downstream consequences, beyond processing in the moment. In particular, when a prediction is disconfirmed, does it linger, or is it suppressed? This study manipulated whether words were actually seen or were only expected, and probed their fate in memory by presenting the words (again) a few sentences later. If disconfirmed predictions linger, subsequent processing of the previously expected (but never presented) word should be similar to actual word repetition. At initial presentation, electrophysiological signatures of prediction disconfirmation demonstrated that participants had formed expectations. Further downstream, relative to unseen words, repeated words elicited a strong N400 decrease, an enhanced late positive complex (LPC), and late alpha band power decreases. Critically, like repeated words, words previously expected but not presented also attenuated the N400. This “pseudo-repetition effect” suggests that disconfirmed predictions can linger at some stages of processing, and demonstrates that prediction has downstream consequences beyond rapid on-line processing.
AB - Prediction can help support rapid language processing. However, it is unclear whether prediction has downstream consequences, beyond processing in the moment. In particular, when a prediction is disconfirmed, does it linger, or is it suppressed? This study manipulated whether words were actually seen or were only expected, and probed their fate in memory by presenting the words (again) a few sentences later. If disconfirmed predictions linger, subsequent processing of the previously expected (but never presented) word should be similar to actual word repetition. At initial presentation, electrophysiological signatures of prediction disconfirmation demonstrated that participants had formed expectations. Further downstream, relative to unseen words, repeated words elicited a strong N400 decrease, an enhanced late positive complex (LPC), and late alpha band power decreases. Critically, like repeated words, words previously expected but not presented also attenuated the N400. This “pseudo-repetition effect” suggests that disconfirmed predictions can linger at some stages of processing, and demonstrates that prediction has downstream consequences beyond rapid on-line processing.
KW - prediction
KW - language comprehension
KW - word repetition
KW - event-related potentials (ERPs)
KW - N400
KW - Alpha
UR - https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/handle/2066/194625
U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.023
DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.023
M3 - Article
VL - 183
SP - 263
EP - 272
JO - Neuroimage
JF - Neuroimage
SN - 1053-8119
ER -