Local closed world reasoning: A personal view on current status and trends

Jeff Z. Pan*, Yuan Ren

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

A personal view on current status and trends in local closed world reasoning (LCWR) is presented. Seylan et al. (2009) proposed the DBox approach to accommodate a database component in an ontology. They found that the DBox has a limitation, inference regarding DBox predicates is prohibited in a sense that no new instance can be inferred. Motik and Rosati (2010) adopted the epistemic operators used in minimal knowledge and negation as failure (MKNF) to model LCWR. This approach introduces a new operator called the K operator to indicate the things that we know in a knowledge base. Ren et al. (2010) proposed an NBox approach to explicitly deal with the closure of a particular vocabulary of an ontology. Research also found that LCWR bridges one of the biggest gaps between legacy relational database systems and ontology based systems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)250-252
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Zhejiang University: Science C
Volume13
Issue number4
Early online date3 Apr 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Ontology
Relational database systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Local closed world reasoning : A personal view on current status and trends. / Pan, Jeff Z.; Ren, Yuan.

In: Journal of Zhejiang University: Science C, Vol. 13, No. 4, 04.2012, p. 250-252.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab30a3f8f4d947dd83f018b85666fdcc,
title = "Local closed world reasoning: A personal view on current status and trends",
abstract = "A personal view on current status and trends in local closed world reasoning (LCWR) is presented. Seylan et al. (2009) proposed the DBox approach to accommodate a database component in an ontology. They found that the DBox has a limitation, inference regarding DBox predicates is prohibited in a sense that no new instance can be inferred. Motik and Rosati (2010) adopted the epistemic operators used in minimal knowledge and negation as failure (MKNF) to model LCWR. This approach introduces a new operator called the K operator to indicate the things that we know in a knowledge base. Ren et al. (2010) proposed an NBox approach to explicitly deal with the closure of a particular vocabulary of an ontology. Research also found that LCWR bridges one of the biggest gaps between legacy relational database systems and ontology based systems.",
author = "Pan, {Jeff Z.} and Yuan Ren",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1631/jzus.C1101004",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "250--252",
journal = "Journal of Zhejiang University: Science C",
issn = "1869-1951",
publisher = "Zhejiang University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Local closed world reasoning

T2 - A personal view on current status and trends

AU - Pan, Jeff Z.

AU - Ren, Yuan

PY - 2012/4

Y1 - 2012/4

N2 - A personal view on current status and trends in local closed world reasoning (LCWR) is presented. Seylan et al. (2009) proposed the DBox approach to accommodate a database component in an ontology. They found that the DBox has a limitation, inference regarding DBox predicates is prohibited in a sense that no new instance can be inferred. Motik and Rosati (2010) adopted the epistemic operators used in minimal knowledge and negation as failure (MKNF) to model LCWR. This approach introduces a new operator called the K operator to indicate the things that we know in a knowledge base. Ren et al. (2010) proposed an NBox approach to explicitly deal with the closure of a particular vocabulary of an ontology. Research also found that LCWR bridges one of the biggest gaps between legacy relational database systems and ontology based systems.

AB - A personal view on current status and trends in local closed world reasoning (LCWR) is presented. Seylan et al. (2009) proposed the DBox approach to accommodate a database component in an ontology. They found that the DBox has a limitation, inference regarding DBox predicates is prohibited in a sense that no new instance can be inferred. Motik and Rosati (2010) adopted the epistemic operators used in minimal knowledge and negation as failure (MKNF) to model LCWR. This approach introduces a new operator called the K operator to indicate the things that we know in a knowledge base. Ren et al. (2010) proposed an NBox approach to explicitly deal with the closure of a particular vocabulary of an ontology. Research also found that LCWR bridges one of the biggest gaps between legacy relational database systems and ontology based systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860712305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1631/jzus.C1101004

DO - 10.1631/jzus.C1101004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860712305

VL - 13

SP - 250

EP - 252

JO - Journal of Zhejiang University: Science C

JF - Journal of Zhejiang University: Science C

SN - 1869-1951

IS - 4

ER -