Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults

systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

S U Dombrowski, K Knittle, A Avenell, V Araújo-Soares, F F Sniehotta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

237 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and describe currently available approaches to supporting maintenance of weight loss in obese adults and to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions.

DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.

STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified through to January 2014. Randomised trials of interventions to maintain weight loss provided to initially obese adults (aged ≥18) after weight loss of ≥5% body weight with long term (≥12 months) follow-up of weight change (main outcome) were included.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Potential studies were screened independently and in duplicate; study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the effects of interventions on weight loss maintenance with the inverse variance method and a random effects model. Results are presented as mean differences in weight change, with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS: 45 trials involving 7788 individuals were included. Behavioural interventions focusing on both food intake and physical activity resulted in an average difference of -1.56 kg (95% confidence interval -2.27 to -0.86 kg; 25 comparisons, 2949 participants) in weight regain compared with controls at 12 months. Orlistat combined with behavioural interventions resulted in a -1.80 kg (-2.54 to -1.06; eight comparisons, 1738 participants) difference compared with placebo at 12 months. All orlistat studies reported higher frequencies of adverse gastrointestinal events in the experimental compared with placebo control groups. A dose-response relation for orlistat treatment was found, with 120 mg doses three times a day leading to greater weight loss maintenance (-2.34 kg, -3.03 to -1.65) compared with 60 mg and 30 mg three times a day (-0.70 kg, 95% confidence interval -1.92 to 0.52), P=0.02.

CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural interventions that deal with both diet and physical activity show small but significant benefits on weight loss maintenance.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberg2646
JournalBMJ
Volume348
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 May 2014

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Weight Loss
Randomized Controlled Trials
Maintenance
Confidence Intervals
Weights and Measures
Placebos
Exercise
Eating
Body Weight
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Diet
Control Groups
orlistat
Therapeutics

Cite this

Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults : systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. / Dombrowski, S U; Knittle, K; Avenell, A; Araújo-Soares, V; Sniehotta, F F.

In: BMJ, Vol. 348, g2646, 14.05.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6a288b3ac51e438cbf164f072868fa07,
title = "Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and describe currently available approaches to supporting maintenance of weight loss in obese adults and to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions.DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified through to January 2014. Randomised trials of interventions to maintain weight loss provided to initially obese adults (aged ≥18) after weight loss of ≥5{\%} body weight with long term (≥12 months) follow-up of weight change (main outcome) were included.STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Potential studies were screened independently and in duplicate; study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the effects of interventions on weight loss maintenance with the inverse variance method and a random effects model. Results are presented as mean differences in weight change, with 95{\%} confidence intervals.RESULTS: 45 trials involving 7788 individuals were included. Behavioural interventions focusing on both food intake and physical activity resulted in an average difference of -1.56 kg (95{\%} confidence interval -2.27 to -0.86 kg; 25 comparisons, 2949 participants) in weight regain compared with controls at 12 months. Orlistat combined with behavioural interventions resulted in a -1.80 kg (-2.54 to -1.06; eight comparisons, 1738 participants) difference compared with placebo at 12 months. All orlistat studies reported higher frequencies of adverse gastrointestinal events in the experimental compared with placebo control groups. A dose-response relation for orlistat treatment was found, with 120 mg doses three times a day leading to greater weight loss maintenance (-2.34 kg, -3.03 to -1.65) compared with 60 mg and 30 mg three times a day (-0.70 kg, 95{\%} confidence interval -1.92 to 0.52), P=0.02.CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural interventions that deal with both diet and physical activity show small but significant benefits on weight loss maintenance.",
author = "Dombrowski, {S U} and K Knittle and A Avenell and V Ara{\'u}jo-Soares and Sniehotta, {F F}",
note = "{\circledC} Dombrowski et al 2014.",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1136/bmj.g2646",
language = "English",
volume = "348",
journal = "BMJ",
issn = "0959-8146",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Long term maintenance of weight loss with non-surgical interventions in obese adults

T2 - systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials

AU - Dombrowski, S U

AU - Knittle, K

AU - Avenell, A

AU - Araújo-Soares, V

AU - Sniehotta, F F

N1 - © Dombrowski et al 2014.

PY - 2014/5/14

Y1 - 2014/5/14

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and describe currently available approaches to supporting maintenance of weight loss in obese adults and to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions.DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified through to January 2014. Randomised trials of interventions to maintain weight loss provided to initially obese adults (aged ≥18) after weight loss of ≥5% body weight with long term (≥12 months) follow-up of weight change (main outcome) were included.STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Potential studies were screened independently and in duplicate; study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the effects of interventions on weight loss maintenance with the inverse variance method and a random effects model. Results are presented as mean differences in weight change, with 95% confidence intervals.RESULTS: 45 trials involving 7788 individuals were included. Behavioural interventions focusing on both food intake and physical activity resulted in an average difference of -1.56 kg (95% confidence interval -2.27 to -0.86 kg; 25 comparisons, 2949 participants) in weight regain compared with controls at 12 months. Orlistat combined with behavioural interventions resulted in a -1.80 kg (-2.54 to -1.06; eight comparisons, 1738 participants) difference compared with placebo at 12 months. All orlistat studies reported higher frequencies of adverse gastrointestinal events in the experimental compared with placebo control groups. A dose-response relation for orlistat treatment was found, with 120 mg doses three times a day leading to greater weight loss maintenance (-2.34 kg, -3.03 to -1.65) compared with 60 mg and 30 mg three times a day (-0.70 kg, 95% confidence interval -1.92 to 0.52), P=0.02.CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural interventions that deal with both diet and physical activity show small but significant benefits on weight loss maintenance.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and describe currently available approaches to supporting maintenance of weight loss in obese adults and to assess the evidence for the effectiveness of these interventions.DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis.DATA SOURCES: Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials.STUDY SELECTION: Studies were identified through to January 2014. Randomised trials of interventions to maintain weight loss provided to initially obese adults (aged ≥18) after weight loss of ≥5% body weight with long term (≥12 months) follow-up of weight change (main outcome) were included.STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS: Potential studies were screened independently and in duplicate; study characteristics and outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted to estimate the effects of interventions on weight loss maintenance with the inverse variance method and a random effects model. Results are presented as mean differences in weight change, with 95% confidence intervals.RESULTS: 45 trials involving 7788 individuals were included. Behavioural interventions focusing on both food intake and physical activity resulted in an average difference of -1.56 kg (95% confidence interval -2.27 to -0.86 kg; 25 comparisons, 2949 participants) in weight regain compared with controls at 12 months. Orlistat combined with behavioural interventions resulted in a -1.80 kg (-2.54 to -1.06; eight comparisons, 1738 participants) difference compared with placebo at 12 months. All orlistat studies reported higher frequencies of adverse gastrointestinal events in the experimental compared with placebo control groups. A dose-response relation for orlistat treatment was found, with 120 mg doses three times a day leading to greater weight loss maintenance (-2.34 kg, -3.03 to -1.65) compared with 60 mg and 30 mg three times a day (-0.70 kg, 95% confidence interval -1.92 to 0.52), P=0.02.CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural interventions that deal with both diet and physical activity show small but significant benefits on weight loss maintenance.

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.g2646

DO - 10.1136/bmj.g2646

M3 - Article

VL - 348

JO - BMJ

JF - BMJ

SN - 0959-8146

M1 - g2646

ER -