Love as Power and Powerlessness

Kierkegaard and Adorno Revisited

Christopher C Brittain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This article defends the ongoing relevance of Adorno's criticism of Kierkegaard's Works of Love, despite the fact that many Kierkegaard scholars dismiss it. To support this claim, the discussion shows how issues at the heart of Adorno's critique resurface in contemporary debates over Kierkegaard's distinction between preferential and non-preferential love. This is particularly evident in Krishek's debate with Ferreira. The article argues that the repair Krishek proposes to Kierkegaard's account falls short of Adorno's insistence on the significance of social context. This issue is drawn out by contrasting Krishek's emphasis on caring compassion with Adorno's preference for concepts such as reconciliation and justice. The discussion subsequently acknowledges that Adorno's own account of subjectivity remains inadequate in ways that recall issues he criticizes in Kierkegaard's philosophy. Potential resources in Adorno's thought are drawn out from some of his aphorisms on the power of love.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-62
Number of pages20
JournalToronto Journal of Theology
Volume33
Issue number1
Early online date20 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Søren Kierkegaard
Powerlessness
Subjectivity
Thought
Social Context
Resources
Reconciliation
Repair
Philosophy
Compassion
Aphorism
Justice
Criticism
Works of Love

Keywords

  • Adorno
  • Kierkegaard
  • love
  • power
  • neighbour

Cite this

Love as Power and Powerlessness : Kierkegaard and Adorno Revisited . / Brittain, Christopher C.

In: Toronto Journal of Theology, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2017, p. 43-62.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brittain, Christopher C. / Love as Power and Powerlessness : Kierkegaard and Adorno Revisited . In: Toronto Journal of Theology. 2017 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 43-62.
@article{22ec0f4aaa9d43559adf6526d0caff88,
title = "Love as Power and Powerlessness: Kierkegaard and Adorno Revisited",
abstract = "This article defends the ongoing relevance of Adorno's criticism of Kierkegaard's Works of Love, despite the fact that many Kierkegaard scholars dismiss it. To support this claim, the discussion shows how issues at the heart of Adorno's critique resurface in contemporary debates over Kierkegaard's distinction between preferential and non-preferential love. This is particularly evident in Krishek's debate with Ferreira. The article argues that the repair Krishek proposes to Kierkegaard's account falls short of Adorno's insistence on the significance of social context. This issue is drawn out by contrasting Krishek's emphasis on caring compassion with Adorno's preference for concepts such as reconciliation and justice. The discussion subsequently acknowledges that Adorno's own account of subjectivity remains inadequate in ways that recall issues he criticizes in Kierkegaard's philosophy. Potential resources in Adorno's thought are drawn out from some of his aphorisms on the power of love.",
keywords = "Adorno, Kierkegaard, love, power, neighbour",
author = "Brittain, {Christopher C}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.3138/tjt.2016-0014",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "43--62",
journal = "Toronto Journal of Theology",
issn = "0826-9831",
publisher = "Toronto School of Theology",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Love as Power and Powerlessness

T2 - Kierkegaard and Adorno Revisited

AU - Brittain, Christopher C

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article defends the ongoing relevance of Adorno's criticism of Kierkegaard's Works of Love, despite the fact that many Kierkegaard scholars dismiss it. To support this claim, the discussion shows how issues at the heart of Adorno's critique resurface in contemporary debates over Kierkegaard's distinction between preferential and non-preferential love. This is particularly evident in Krishek's debate with Ferreira. The article argues that the repair Krishek proposes to Kierkegaard's account falls short of Adorno's insistence on the significance of social context. This issue is drawn out by contrasting Krishek's emphasis on caring compassion with Adorno's preference for concepts such as reconciliation and justice. The discussion subsequently acknowledges that Adorno's own account of subjectivity remains inadequate in ways that recall issues he criticizes in Kierkegaard's philosophy. Potential resources in Adorno's thought are drawn out from some of his aphorisms on the power of love.

AB - This article defends the ongoing relevance of Adorno's criticism of Kierkegaard's Works of Love, despite the fact that many Kierkegaard scholars dismiss it. To support this claim, the discussion shows how issues at the heart of Adorno's critique resurface in contemporary debates over Kierkegaard's distinction between preferential and non-preferential love. This is particularly evident in Krishek's debate with Ferreira. The article argues that the repair Krishek proposes to Kierkegaard's account falls short of Adorno's insistence on the significance of social context. This issue is drawn out by contrasting Krishek's emphasis on caring compassion with Adorno's preference for concepts such as reconciliation and justice. The discussion subsequently acknowledges that Adorno's own account of subjectivity remains inadequate in ways that recall issues he criticizes in Kierkegaard's philosophy. Potential resources in Adorno's thought are drawn out from some of his aphorisms on the power of love.

KW - Adorno

KW - Kierkegaard

KW - love

KW - power

KW - neighbour

U2 - 10.3138/tjt.2016-0014

DO - 10.3138/tjt.2016-0014

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 43

EP - 62

JO - Toronto Journal of Theology

JF - Toronto Journal of Theology

SN - 0826-9831

IS - 1

ER -