Low-temperature SEM imaging of polymer structure in engineered and natural sediments and the implications regarding stability

R. G. Perkins, I. R. Davidson, D. M. Paterson, Hongyue Sun, John Watson, Michael Antony Player

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpretation of electron micrographs is often used as qualitative support of quantitative data. Conventional and low-temperature scanning electron microscopy (SEM and LTSEM, respectively) have often been used to visualise biofilms and microbial mats and investigate their role in the biogenic stabilisation of sediments. This study investigated the use of LTSEM to image the "binding" of artificial sand and clay systems by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Xanthurn gum (commercial bacterial EPS) and diatom EPS were mixed with cleaned sand particles and the apparent structure of the polymer in the matrix observed in relation to different stages of sample preparation. In addition, diatoms were added to sand to allow comparison of EPS production "in situ" within the matrix, with that prepared separately and added. The commonly accepted in situ structure of polymer, strands and plates, was found to be a preparatory artefact, as a result of desiccation of the sample prior to freezing, cryofixation and also partial freeze-drying in the LTSEM. The natural structure of the polymer is more likely to be an amorphous gel/sol equilibrium within the inter-particle spaces. In addition, EPS produced by diatoms in situ and examined by LTSEM forms a granular "floc and plate" structure, similar in appearance to fine cohesive particles, rather than the strands and plates previously reported. These results show that caution is needed where a mechanistic interpretation of polymer binding is derived from interpreting LTSEM images. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)48-55
Number of pages7
JournalGeoderma
Volume134
Issue number1-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2006

Keywords

  • EPS
  • SEM
  • polymer
  • LTSEM
  • artefact
  • intertidal sediments
  • exopolymer production
  • electron-microscopy
  • epipelic diatoms
  • microphytobenthos
  • dynamics
  • biology
  • erosion

Cite this

Low-temperature SEM imaging of polymer structure in engineered and natural sediments and the implications regarding stability. / Perkins, R. G.; Davidson, I. R.; Paterson, D. M.; Sun, Hongyue; Watson, John; Player, Michael Antony.

In: Geoderma, Vol. 134, No. 1-2, 09.2006, p. 48-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9e0de0368e5e4e629843c2ac9ae9f935,
title = "Low-temperature SEM imaging of polymer structure in engineered and natural sediments and the implications regarding stability",
abstract = "Interpretation of electron micrographs is often used as qualitative support of quantitative data. Conventional and low-temperature scanning electron microscopy (SEM and LTSEM, respectively) have often been used to visualise biofilms and microbial mats and investigate their role in the biogenic stabilisation of sediments. This study investigated the use of LTSEM to image the {"}binding{"} of artificial sand and clay systems by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Xanthurn gum (commercial bacterial EPS) and diatom EPS were mixed with cleaned sand particles and the apparent structure of the polymer in the matrix observed in relation to different stages of sample preparation. In addition, diatoms were added to sand to allow comparison of EPS production {"}in situ{"} within the matrix, with that prepared separately and added. The commonly accepted in situ structure of polymer, strands and plates, was found to be a preparatory artefact, as a result of desiccation of the sample prior to freezing, cryofixation and also partial freeze-drying in the LTSEM. The natural structure of the polymer is more likely to be an amorphous gel/sol equilibrium within the inter-particle spaces. In addition, EPS produced by diatoms in situ and examined by LTSEM forms a granular {"}floc and plate{"} structure, similar in appearance to fine cohesive particles, rather than the strands and plates previously reported. These results show that caution is needed where a mechanistic interpretation of polymer binding is derived from interpreting LTSEM images. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "EPS, SEM, polymer, LTSEM, artefact, intertidal sediments, exopolymer production, electron-microscopy, epipelic diatoms, microphytobenthos, dynamics, biology, erosion",
author = "Perkins, {R. G.} and Davidson, {I. R.} and Paterson, {D. M.} and Hongyue Sun and John Watson and Player, {Michael Antony}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.08.017",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "48--55",
journal = "Geoderma",
issn = "0016-7061",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Low-temperature SEM imaging of polymer structure in engineered and natural sediments and the implications regarding stability

AU - Perkins, R. G.

AU - Davidson, I. R.

AU - Paterson, D. M.

AU - Sun, Hongyue

AU - Watson, John

AU - Player, Michael Antony

PY - 2006/9

Y1 - 2006/9

N2 - Interpretation of electron micrographs is often used as qualitative support of quantitative data. Conventional and low-temperature scanning electron microscopy (SEM and LTSEM, respectively) have often been used to visualise biofilms and microbial mats and investigate their role in the biogenic stabilisation of sediments. This study investigated the use of LTSEM to image the "binding" of artificial sand and clay systems by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Xanthurn gum (commercial bacterial EPS) and diatom EPS were mixed with cleaned sand particles and the apparent structure of the polymer in the matrix observed in relation to different stages of sample preparation. In addition, diatoms were added to sand to allow comparison of EPS production "in situ" within the matrix, with that prepared separately and added. The commonly accepted in situ structure of polymer, strands and plates, was found to be a preparatory artefact, as a result of desiccation of the sample prior to freezing, cryofixation and also partial freeze-drying in the LTSEM. The natural structure of the polymer is more likely to be an amorphous gel/sol equilibrium within the inter-particle spaces. In addition, EPS produced by diatoms in situ and examined by LTSEM forms a granular "floc and plate" structure, similar in appearance to fine cohesive particles, rather than the strands and plates previously reported. These results show that caution is needed where a mechanistic interpretation of polymer binding is derived from interpreting LTSEM images. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Interpretation of electron micrographs is often used as qualitative support of quantitative data. Conventional and low-temperature scanning electron microscopy (SEM and LTSEM, respectively) have often been used to visualise biofilms and microbial mats and investigate their role in the biogenic stabilisation of sediments. This study investigated the use of LTSEM to image the "binding" of artificial sand and clay systems by extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Xanthurn gum (commercial bacterial EPS) and diatom EPS were mixed with cleaned sand particles and the apparent structure of the polymer in the matrix observed in relation to different stages of sample preparation. In addition, diatoms were added to sand to allow comparison of EPS production "in situ" within the matrix, with that prepared separately and added. The commonly accepted in situ structure of polymer, strands and plates, was found to be a preparatory artefact, as a result of desiccation of the sample prior to freezing, cryofixation and also partial freeze-drying in the LTSEM. The natural structure of the polymer is more likely to be an amorphous gel/sol equilibrium within the inter-particle spaces. In addition, EPS produced by diatoms in situ and examined by LTSEM forms a granular "floc and plate" structure, similar in appearance to fine cohesive particles, rather than the strands and plates previously reported. These results show that caution is needed where a mechanistic interpretation of polymer binding is derived from interpreting LTSEM images. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - EPS

KW - SEM

KW - polymer

KW - LTSEM

KW - artefact

KW - intertidal sediments

KW - exopolymer production

KW - electron-microscopy

KW - epipelic diatoms

KW - microphytobenthos

KW - dynamics

KW - biology

KW - erosion

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.08.017

M3 - Article

VL - 134

SP - 48

EP - 55

JO - Geoderma

JF - Geoderma

SN - 0016-7061

IS - 1-2

ER -