Making Southern Realities Count

research agendas and design in North-South collaborations

Birgit Elke Jentsch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article illustrates some of the issues that arise when the commonly espoused principles of research partnerships are considered in the practice of North-South collaborations. It points to dynamics that may occur when research agendas are not shared by collaborators. Moreover, it questions the roles partners adopt during fieldwork in relation to the distribution of control over a research project. Related to this, the article explores issues of funding. What is the potential for collaborations with a project lead by Southern partners, which would reflect more strongly Southern realities in research projects? It is concluded that hierarchical research arrangements may be desirable in some circumstances, for example, where they favour the South; that Northern and Southern capacities and weaknesses should be made explicit; and that capacity building should be pursued beyond the point where it serves the North.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)259-269
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004

Fingerprint

research project
funding

Cite this

Making Southern Realities Count : research agendas and design in North-South collaborations. / Jentsch, Birgit Elke.

In: International Journal of Social Research Methodology , Vol. 7, No. 3, 07.2004, p. 259-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9533d9b042904f36957b614ae9e0b8ef,
title = "Making Southern Realities Count: research agendas and design in North-South collaborations",
abstract = "This article illustrates some of the issues that arise when the commonly espoused principles of research partnerships are considered in the practice of North-South collaborations. It points to dynamics that may occur when research agendas are not shared by collaborators. Moreover, it questions the roles partners adopt during fieldwork in relation to the distribution of control over a research project. Related to this, the article explores issues of funding. What is the potential for collaborations with a project lead by Southern partners, which would reflect more strongly Southern realities in research projects? It is concluded that hierarchical research arrangements may be desirable in some circumstances, for example, where they favour the South; that Northern and Southern capacities and weaknesses should be made explicit; and that capacity building should be pursued beyond the point where it serves the North.",
author = "Jentsch, {Birgit Elke}",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1080/1364557021000024776",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "259--269",
journal = "International Journal of Social Research Methodology",
issn = "1364-5579",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Southern Realities Count

T2 - research agendas and design in North-South collaborations

AU - Jentsch, Birgit Elke

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - This article illustrates some of the issues that arise when the commonly espoused principles of research partnerships are considered in the practice of North-South collaborations. It points to dynamics that may occur when research agendas are not shared by collaborators. Moreover, it questions the roles partners adopt during fieldwork in relation to the distribution of control over a research project. Related to this, the article explores issues of funding. What is the potential for collaborations with a project lead by Southern partners, which would reflect more strongly Southern realities in research projects? It is concluded that hierarchical research arrangements may be desirable in some circumstances, for example, where they favour the South; that Northern and Southern capacities and weaknesses should be made explicit; and that capacity building should be pursued beyond the point where it serves the North.

AB - This article illustrates some of the issues that arise when the commonly espoused principles of research partnerships are considered in the practice of North-South collaborations. It points to dynamics that may occur when research agendas are not shared by collaborators. Moreover, it questions the roles partners adopt during fieldwork in relation to the distribution of control over a research project. Related to this, the article explores issues of funding. What is the potential for collaborations with a project lead by Southern partners, which would reflect more strongly Southern realities in research projects? It is concluded that hierarchical research arrangements may be desirable in some circumstances, for example, where they favour the South; that Northern and Southern capacities and weaknesses should be made explicit; and that capacity building should be pursued beyond the point where it serves the North.

U2 - 10.1080/1364557021000024776

DO - 10.1080/1364557021000024776

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 259

EP - 269

JO - International Journal of Social Research Methodology

JF - International Journal of Social Research Methodology

SN - 1364-5579

IS - 3

ER -