Management of COPD in primary care in north-east Scotland

J Cleland, M. Mackenzie, I Small, G Douglas, I. Gentles

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: We wished to obtain a snapshot of current service provision and how this could best be developed approximately one year on from the introduction of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the inclusion of COPD care in the New GMS Contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).
Methodology: A questionnaire-based survey sent to every general practice (n = 84) in Grampian.
Results: Responses were received from 75 of 84 practices (89%). Questionnaires were returned by both general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in 45 practices (54%). All responding practices reported that they had COPD registers. 60/75 (80%) of practices reported having a dedicated COPD clinic; 70/75 (93%) had a spirometer. Areas identified for service development were: quality assuring training in COPD care and spirometry; expanding pulmonary rehabilitation provision (86%), delivering this service locally (54%) and in primary care (75%); standardising referral, assessment and communication about provision of home oxygen; training in pulse oximetry (71%).
Conclusion: This data has important implications for the validity of the quality indicators (QOF) under the new GMS contract. Our respondents identified areas where the new GMS contract QOF could be improved, as well as providing useful suggestions for service development. Respondents recognised that not all clinical services can be effectively delivered by general practice with data supporting the development of intermediate care services for people with COPD.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-14
Number of pages5
JournalScottish Medical Journal
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • obstructive pulmonary disease
  • airways obstruction
  • spirometry

Cite this

Management of COPD in primary care in north-east Scotland. / Cleland, J; Mackenzie, M.; Small, I; Douglas, G; Gentles, I.

In: Scottish Medical Journal, Vol. 51, No. 4, 11.2006, p. 10-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cleland, J ; Mackenzie, M. ; Small, I ; Douglas, G ; Gentles, I. / Management of COPD in primary care in north-east Scotland. In: Scottish Medical Journal. 2006 ; Vol. 51, No. 4. pp. 10-14.
@article{2fdf88e616e541648654815334c550cd,
title = "Management of COPD in primary care in north-east Scotland",
abstract = "Introduction: We wished to obtain a snapshot of current service provision and how this could best be developed approximately one year on from the introduction of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the inclusion of COPD care in the New GMS Contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Methodology: A questionnaire-based survey sent to every general practice (n = 84) in Grampian. Results: Responses were received from 75 of 84 practices (89{\%}). Questionnaires were returned by both general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in 45 practices (54{\%}). All responding practices reported that they had COPD registers. 60/75 (80{\%}) of practices reported having a dedicated COPD clinic; 70/75 (93{\%}) had a spirometer. Areas identified for service development were: quality assuring training in COPD care and spirometry; expanding pulmonary rehabilitation provision (86{\%}), delivering this service locally (54{\%}) and in primary care (75{\%}); standardising referral, assessment and communication about provision of home oxygen; training in pulse oximetry (71{\%}). Conclusion: This data has important implications for the validity of the quality indicators (QOF) under the new GMS contract. Our respondents identified areas where the new GMS contract QOF could be improved, as well as providing useful suggestions for service development. Respondents recognised that not all clinical services can be effectively delivered by general practice with data supporting the development of intermediate care services for people with COPD.",
keywords = "obstructive pulmonary disease, airways obstruction, spirometry",
author = "J Cleland and M. Mackenzie and I Small and G Douglas and I. Gentles",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1258/rsmsmj.51.4.10",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "10--14",
journal = "Scottish Medical Journal",
issn = "0036-9330",
publisher = "SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Management of COPD in primary care in north-east Scotland

AU - Cleland, J

AU - Mackenzie, M.

AU - Small, I

AU - Douglas, G

AU - Gentles, I.

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Introduction: We wished to obtain a snapshot of current service provision and how this could best be developed approximately one year on from the introduction of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the inclusion of COPD care in the New GMS Contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Methodology: A questionnaire-based survey sent to every general practice (n = 84) in Grampian. Results: Responses were received from 75 of 84 practices (89%). Questionnaires were returned by both general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in 45 practices (54%). All responding practices reported that they had COPD registers. 60/75 (80%) of practices reported having a dedicated COPD clinic; 70/75 (93%) had a spirometer. Areas identified for service development were: quality assuring training in COPD care and spirometry; expanding pulmonary rehabilitation provision (86%), delivering this service locally (54%) and in primary care (75%); standardising referral, assessment and communication about provision of home oxygen; training in pulse oximetry (71%). Conclusion: This data has important implications for the validity of the quality indicators (QOF) under the new GMS contract. Our respondents identified areas where the new GMS contract QOF could be improved, as well as providing useful suggestions for service development. Respondents recognised that not all clinical services can be effectively delivered by general practice with data supporting the development of intermediate care services for people with COPD.

AB - Introduction: We wished to obtain a snapshot of current service provision and how this could best be developed approximately one year on from the introduction of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and the inclusion of COPD care in the New GMS Contract Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). Methodology: A questionnaire-based survey sent to every general practice (n = 84) in Grampian. Results: Responses were received from 75 of 84 practices (89%). Questionnaires were returned by both general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses in 45 practices (54%). All responding practices reported that they had COPD registers. 60/75 (80%) of practices reported having a dedicated COPD clinic; 70/75 (93%) had a spirometer. Areas identified for service development were: quality assuring training in COPD care and spirometry; expanding pulmonary rehabilitation provision (86%), delivering this service locally (54%) and in primary care (75%); standardising referral, assessment and communication about provision of home oxygen; training in pulse oximetry (71%). Conclusion: This data has important implications for the validity of the quality indicators (QOF) under the new GMS contract. Our respondents identified areas where the new GMS contract QOF could be improved, as well as providing useful suggestions for service development. Respondents recognised that not all clinical services can be effectively delivered by general practice with data supporting the development of intermediate care services for people with COPD.

KW - obstructive pulmonary disease

KW - airways obstruction

KW - spirometry

U2 - 10.1258/rsmsmj.51.4.10

DO - 10.1258/rsmsmj.51.4.10

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 10

EP - 14

JO - Scottish Medical Journal

JF - Scottish Medical Journal

SN - 0036-9330

IS - 4

ER -