Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: The PPROMEXIL-2 trial

David P. Van Der Ham*, Jantien L. Van Der Heyden, Brent C. Opmeer, Antonius L.M. Mulder, Rob M.J. Moonen, J. J. Van Beek, Maureen T.M. Franssen, Kitty W.M. Bloemenkamp, J. M. Sikkema, Christianne J.M. De Groot, Martina Porath, Anneke Kwee, Mallory D. Woiski, J. J. Duvekot, Bettina M.C. Akerboom, Aren J. Van Loon, Jan W. De Leeuw, Christine Willekes, Ben W.J. Mol, Jan G. Nijhuis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The evidence for the management of near term prelabor rupture of membranes is poor. From January 2007 until September 2009, we performed the PPROM Expectant Management versus Induction of Labor (PPROMEXIL) trial. In this trial, we showed that in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM), the incidence of neonatal sepsis was low, and the induction of labor (IoL) did not reduce this risk. Because the PPROMEXIL trial was underpowered and because of a lower-than-expected incidence of neonatal sepsis, we performed a second trial (PPROMEXIL-2), aiming to randomize 200 patients to improve the evidence in near-term PPROM. Study Design: In a nationwide multicenter study, nonlaboring women with PPROM between 34 and 37 weeks' gestational age were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomized to IoL or expectant management (EM). The primary outcome measure was neonatal sepsis. Results: From December 2009 until January 2011, we randomized 100 women to IoL and 95 to EM. Neonatal sepsis was seen in 3 neonates (3.0%) in the IoL-group versus 4 neonates (4.1%) in the EM group (relative risk, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-3.2). One of the sepsis cases in the IoL group resulted in neonatal death because of asphyxia. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusion: The risk of neonatal sepsis after PPROM near term is low. Induction of labor does not reduce this risk.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)276.e1-276.e10
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume207
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2012

Keywords

  • induction of labor
  • neonatal sepsis
  • PPROM Expectant Management versus Induction of Labor trial
  • preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: The PPROMEXIL-2 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Van Der Ham, D. P., Van Der Heyden, J. L., Opmeer, B. C., Mulder, A. L. M., Moonen, R. M. J., Van Beek, J. J., Franssen, M. T. M., Bloemenkamp, K. W. M., Sikkema, J. M., De Groot, C. J. M., Porath, M., Kwee, A., Woiski, M. D., Duvekot, J. J., Akerboom, B. M. C., Van Loon, A. J., De Leeuw, J. W., Willekes, C., Mol, B. W. J., & Nijhuis, J. G. (2012). Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: The PPROMEXIL-2 trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 207(4), 276.e1-276.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.07.024